On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> Added to a new "usage proposal" section at
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReleaseChecklist - does that
>> proposal work for you guys?
>
> I like it. It basically looks
Thanks Marvin, that helped me out quite a bit!
- Taylor
On Dec 11, 2013, at 12:24 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:10 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>> It's kind of interesting to see how this has changed over time and varies
>> from project to project.
>
> Here's Roy Field
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:10 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> It's kind of interesting to see how this has changed over time and varies
> from project to project.
Here's Roy Fielding in June 2008, saying exactly the same thing you'll hear
from us now:
http://s.apache.org/Y4v
If the notices
Thanks Suresh, that's a big help.
Having a recently approved example helps a lot. The source vs. binary release
examples help as well.
It's kind of interesting to see how this has changed over time and varies from
project to project.
Taylor
> On Dec 10, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
Hi Jake,
Thanks so much! Yes for sure, will do.
Many Thanks
Imesh
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> done, please use the builds@ list if you have any questions
>
> -Jake
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
>
>> Hi Jake,
>>
>> Thank you very much
On Dec 10, 2013, at 6:15 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> In the process of preparing the LICENSE and NOTICE files for Storm, I started
> looking at what other Apache projects (both incubator and TLPs) have done.
>
> It seems like approaches are all over the map. I've even seen projects that
> don
ant elder wrote:
> Benson Margulies wrote:
> >
> > If we deleted every
> > release from the main Foundation distro area that had some divergence
> > from some policy, no matter how tiny, my suspicion is that the distro
> > area would become rather sparse.
>
> Yes quite. And lets not forget how t
In the process of preparing the LICENSE and NOTICE files for Storm, I started
looking at what other Apache projects (both incubator and TLPs) have done.
It seems like approaches are all over the map. I've even seen projects that
don't have a NOTICE.
My question to any mentors and PMC members is
done, please use the builds@ list if you have any questions
-Jake
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> Hi Jake,
>
> Thank you very much for your quick response.
> I would like to grant permissions to my apache user:
>
> Username: imesh
> Email: im...@apache.org
>
> Many T
Hi Jake,
Thank you very much for your quick response.
I would like to grant permissions to my apache user:
Username: imesh
Email: im...@apache.org
Many Thanks
Imesh
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Hey Imesh
> I can help, who are you trying to grant permissions to?
>
>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> For Aurora everything is progressing nicely. All initial setup and on
> boarding is completed and development has started using ASF infrastructure
> (jira/reviewboard/etc). No blockers or issues at this time.
I've taken the liberty of putting
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Matt Franklin wrote:
> Apologies for tardiness in completing the review.
>
> I have reviewed the community and have concluded that it is very active
> and healthy. IMO, #3 in the issues to address before graduation is not
> critical and can be successf
Hey Marvin
For Aurora everything is progressing nicely. All initial setup and on
boarding is completed and development has started using ASF infrastructure
(jira/reviewboard/etc). No blockers or issues at this time.
Usergid was not listed in the reports for this month, as a new podling less
than 3
Hey Imesh
I can help, who are you trying to grant permissions to?
-Jake
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm writing regarding setting up Jenkins for Apache Stratos (incubating).
>
> According to instructions given here [1] I tried to grant permissions to
>
Apologies for tardiness in completing the review.
I have reviewed the community and have concluded that it is very active
and
healthy. IMO, #3 in the issues to address before graduation is not
critical
and can be successfully mitigated by documenting the tasks that are
currently
b
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> If we deleted every
> release from the main Foundation distro area that had some divergence
> from some policy, no matter how tiny, my suspicion is that the distro
> area would become rather sparse.
>
Yes quite. And lets not forget how
>
> Therefore, when we say that incubating releases "can have small IP loose
> ends", we mean:
>
> * This is an official release, created by an act of the Foundation.
> * It is known to violate policy.
> * It could be removed, but no one has done so yet.
>
> I'm comfortable with relying on "p
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:30 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> Define "lower bar". Do you see any of the review items
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release_manifest.txt as optional?
>>
> ...Probably all of those could be optional or fixed next t
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:34 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> I know you're passionate about this Marvin but as it stands I'll be
>> voting against this proposal.
>
> I plan to propose this as an experiment
Well ok, earlier you said you'd planed it
19 matches
Mail list logo
