On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:34 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I know you're passionate about this Marvin but as it stands I'll be
> voting against this proposal.
I plan to propose this as an experiment which podlings would opt into.
Hopefully, I can persuade you not to oppose such an experiment, just as you
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> My understanding is that incubating releases can have small IP loose
> ends, but not that they can proceed before the main clearance of an
> initial code donation.
It would be good to establish some clarity around this issue. Here is how
Hi All,
I'm writing regarding setting up Jenkins for Apache Stratos (incubating).
According to instructions given here [1] I tried to grant permissions to
one of the committers but it was not successful. I also wrote to Apache
Infra mail list but couldn't find any solutions.
Really appreciate if
+1
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 6 December 2013 14:12, Ashish wrote:
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Stack wrote:
> > >
> >
+1
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 6 December 2013 14:12, Ashish wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Stack wrote:
> >
> >> Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> >> posting on November
+1 (binding)
On 6 December 2013 14:12, Ashish wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Stack wrote:
>
>> Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
>> posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>>
>> Let us now move to a vote.
>>
>> Sh
Recasting my +1 (binding). It did not go previously.
Enis
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Doug Meil wrote:
>
> +1 for Phoenix.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/5/13 4:43 PM, "Stack" wrote:
>
> >Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> >posting on November 7th. Feedback has been
+1 for Phoenix.
On 12/5/13 4:43 PM, "Stack" wrote:
>Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
>posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>
>Let us now move to a vote.
>
>Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
>
>[] +1 Accept Phoenix into
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Stack wrote:
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>
> Let us now move to a vote.
>
> Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
>
> [] +1 Accept Phoenix into the Incub
Allura
(No shepherd review filed.)
Aurora
(No shepherd review filed.)
BatchEE
Marvin Humphrey (marvin):
Podling did not report. Please report next month.
Also, please edit podlings.xml metadata and address all "FIX
On 9 Dec 2013, at 6:05, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
So please instead of discussing again about procedures.
Just discuss about the release :-)
/me trying to rock the boat
Sirona has FIVE Mentors, plus another committer who is on the IPMC.
Onl
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Matt Franklin wrote:
> Christian is right. We are watching the lists and follow the discussions,
> but do look for DISCUSS, VOTE, or MENTOR flags especially.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Christian Grobmeier >wrote:
>
> > Taylor,
> >
> > your mentors shoul
Christian is right. We are watching the lists and follow the discussions,
but do look for DISCUSS, VOTE, or MENTOR flags especially.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Taylor,
>
> your mentors should read the mailing lists. Why I would not expect to get
> answers when
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:30 PM, ant elder wrote:
>...The point is i think that podlings learn
> about the requirements but that doesn't mean we must block releases or
> make people jump through hoops to do that learning...
I agree with that, and I don't think we're saying that all items from
the
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> ...2) Podlings should normally graduate after the first release (and we
>> should more proactively do that) not stay to do more...
>
> I wouldn't set this as a goal. It's ni
On 9 December 2013 22:04, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> ...2) Podlings should normally graduate after the first release (and we
>> should more proactively do that) not stay to do more...
>
> I wouldn't set this as a goal. It's nice when
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, ant elder wrote:
> ...2) Podlings should normally graduate after the first release (and we
> should more proactively do that) not stay to do more...
I wouldn't set this as a goal. It's nice when it happens, but as you
say the goal is for a podling to be gene
I know you're passionate about this Marvin but as it stands I'll be
voting against this proposal.
1) This proposal doesn't help podlings with the first release
2) Podlings should normally graduate after the first release (and we
should more proactively do that) not stay to do more
3) The proposal
This vote passes with 4 +1 from:
* Chris Mattmann
* Marvin Humphrey
* Scott Deboy
* Christian Grobmeier
I am going to set up the new podling the next days.
On 4 Dec 2013, at 20:48, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Dear all,
please cast your vote to accept Log4cxx for incation.
The proposal is
my own +1
On 4 Dec 2013, at 20:48, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Dear all,
please cast your vote to accept Log4cxx for incation.
The proposal is pasted below, but can be found here too:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Log4cxxProposal
This vote will close in 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Accept Log4cxx int
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> ...I think two more improvements are needed:
>
> (1) PPMC members should be sure to record the votes of community members who
> are not PPMC/committers and have no apache id.
> (2) The header should include a reference to the VOTE thread.
21 matches
Mail list logo
