Now that Storm has gotten its final non-Apache release (0.9.0) out the door
[1], we’re ready to dig in and focus entirely on migrating to Apache.
Until now, we’ve not been all that focused on embracing the Apache process
(we’ve been trying to get 0.9.0 out to a waiting community), and so haven’t
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> > Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >>
> >> i just added the ripple report for december (its the same as november).
> >>
> >> We were to late in november. however the report template generator didn't
> >> include us in generation.
>
> OK, I see what h
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> i just added the ripple report for december (its the same as november).
>>
>> We were to late in november. however the report template generator didn't
>> include us in genera
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> i just added the ripple report for december (its the same as november).
>
> We were to late in november. however the report template generator didn't
> include us in generation.
Ripple is in reporting group 1: January, April, July, Octo
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lowe [mailto:jl...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 12:56 PM
To: d...@tez.incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.2.0-incubating RC0
+1
- verified digests and signatures
- built from sourc
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> My comment was more about this:
>
> "This seems like an excellent opportunity for people who are less
> experienced or perhaps not members of the IPMC yet to try their hand at
> mentoring."
I should have used another word: "... try their han
Hi,
My comment was more about this:
"This seems like an excellent opportunity for people who are less
experienced or perhaps not members of the IPMC yet to try their hand at
mentoring."
that you putting your self forward, but thanks for clearing it up.
Thanks,
Justin
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:
Hi Justin,
both - Scott and me - are ASF members and IPMC members.
The policy has not changed.
Cheers,
Christian
On 4 Dec 2013, at 22:10, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
I thought you needed to be a IPMC member in order to be a mentor. [1]
states that "Mentors MUST be on the IPMC." If you're an AS
thanks!
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i just added the ripple report for december (its the same as november).
>
> We were to late in november. however the report template generator didn't
> include us in generation.
>
> can this be fixed for the next time o
Hi,
I thought you needed to be a IPMC member in order to be a mentor. [1]
states that "Mentors MUST be on the IPMC." If you're an ASF member you can
ask to be on the IPMC [2]. So by "people" above I assume you mean ASF/IPMC
members or has this changed?
Thanks,
Justin
1.http://incubator.apache.or
Sorry guys this is NOT an official vote. We are thinking of starting one
real soon though.
@Ravi, please refrain from starting a VOTE thread like this. The VOTE
should come from the proposers and should include the actual proposal etc.
However, I can understand the enthusiasm :)
We'll start the v
Hi,
i just added the ripple report for december (its the same as november).
We were to late in november. however the report template generator
didn't include us in generation.
can this be fixed for the next time or do we simply roll back to report
in 2 months (no problem with that)
Cheers
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:42 PM, ant elder wrote:
> Just fyi so I'm not accused of not saying anything - I'm not totally sure
> what the intention is for this and I'm all for doing some experiments and
> wouldn't get in the way if this is to be tried with a podling, however this
> looks like its b
+1 (binding)
On 12/4/13, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> [ ] +1 Accept Log4cxx into the Incubator
>> [ ] -1 Don't accept Log4cxx because...
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>> Florian Seydoux (ICLA signed)
>> chand priyankara (ICLA signed)
>> Nick Wi
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> [ ] +1 Accept Log4cxx into the Incubator
> [ ] -1 Don't accept Log4cxx because...
+1 (binding)
> Florian Seydoux (ICLA signed)
> chand priyankara (ICLA signed)
> Nick Williams (Apache Logging Committer)
> Thorsten Schöning
> Rhys
+1 from me (binding). Good luck dudes!
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Christian Grobmeier
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 11:48 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Log4cxx for Incubation
>Dear all,
>
>please
Dear all,
please cast your vote to accept Log4cxx for incation.
The proposal is pasted below, but can be found here too:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Log4cxxProposal
This vote will close in 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Accept Log4cxx into the Incubator
[ ] -1 Don't accept Log4cxx because...
Thanks,
Thanks a lot for your comments Marvin. They were very encouraging.
Scott Deboy just pinged me that he joins the ranks of log4cxx mentors.
He is also is involved in Apache Logging.
I am going to call a vote!
On 4 Dec 2013, at 20:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Chri
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Since there are no other interested mentors: would you folks object if we
> start anyway?
Sounds like a throwback to the early days of the Incubator when I hear there
was only one Mentor per podling. :) +1, go ahead!
The podling will
This is not an official vote, is it?
In any case. +1
-- Lars
From: Ravi Kiran
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 8:37 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Phoenix for Apache Incubator
+1
An exciting project which we are currently evaluating at
It seems to me that this isn't an official vote.
Ravi, I don't see your name on the proposal anywhere, nor do I see the
proposal included in the vote, which means we don't really know what we
are voting for.
I would suggest that this particular vote be cancelled, and another be
started by the cha
+1
-Anoop-
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2013, Michael Sick wrote:
>
> > +1 here
> > Have multiple clients that are interested in Phoenix over HBase.
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>- Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their w
+1
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013, Michael Sick wrote:
> +1 here
> Have multiple clients that are interested in Phoenix over HBase.
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
+1 here
Have multiple clients that are interested in Phoenix over HBase.
The vote has been cancelled to address issues raised for the LICENSE and
NOTICE files.
regards,
Rahul
On 4 December 2013 03:29, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> Thanks Sebb for explaining out in detail, since this is our first release I
> think we would require some guidance. We would fix the LICENSE and the
> NOTICE but there a few questions, in the same regard.
>
> This an eclipse plugin so we are using ot
Hi,
I would appreciate comments if you believe my proceeding is OK.
Since there are no other interested mentors: would you folks object if
we start anyway?
I feel a bit alone with my proposal. Given the size of the IPMC thats a
bit sad.
Thanks,
Christian
On 28 Nov 2013, at 10:50, Christia
27 matches
Mail list logo
