On 11/17/13 10:38 AM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>
>Also, any ASF member can ask to join the Incubator PMC. So, "any ASF
>member" can technically review any vote, simply by sending an email to
>the Incubator PMC private list - so we have that situation already. I'd
>have no issue with members of other
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:09 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> One thing that would help is to also clear the clutter.
>
> Clutch has been alerting to old releases hanging around.
> http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#other
> There are many in that list with the entry:
> "Has graduated, but still h
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>* I am sure with the name like Phoenix there's tons of clashes,
> but perhaps Apache Phoenix should be fine
We'd be fine with "Apache Phoenix".
>* How tightly coupled is it with HBase? IOW, do you anticipate
> needing to
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:43 PM, James Taylor
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We're pleased to share a draft ASF incubation proposal for Phoenix, a
> > SQL layer over HBase, initially developed at Salesforce.com and
> > subsequently open s
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:43 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We're pleased to share a draft ASF incubation proposal for Phoenix, a
> SQL layer over HBase, initially developed at Salesforce.com and
> subsequently open sourced on github
> (https://github.com/forcedotcom/phoenix). Instead of u
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Benson,
>
> How does that relate to my post? Not sure if I can see the connection.
I thought I was replying to Alex, but my sentiment is applicable to
what you write below.
The IPMC is a group of people with a job. It's not a 'project
community
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Hello general@incubator,
>
> Infra has requested that we perform some cleanup of our distribution area.
> Earlier this week, both Allura and VXQuery experienced difficulties with
> synchronization between their dist.apache.org release directories and the
> main mirror at <
Marvin, you have my wholehearted agreement.
Upayavira
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 07:18 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > 1) I think there is more to PPMC membership than just voting on releases.
>
> I'm sure that everyone agrees on this point 1
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> 1) I think there is more to PPMC membership than just voting on releases.
I'm sure that everyone agrees on this point 100%. Everything that Benson had
to say a couple messages back about PMC membership[1] also applies to PPMC
membership.
Nev
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 03:41 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/17/13 3:17 AM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>
> >
> >With a two tier model - with PPMC membership granting voting rights on
> >podling releases, then a podling would start with just mentors on its
> >PPMC. If you clearly knew what you wer
Benson,
How does that relate to my post? Not sure if I can see the connection.
Are you suggesting that we should be okay voting PPMC members who are
taking responsibility within their project into the Incubator PMC? To
me, that would be equivalent to granting a new committer ASF membership
while
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Ambari from Incubator
+1 for graduation (binding)
thanks,
Arun
> On Nov 15, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Yusaku Sako wrote:
>
> This is a call for vote to graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator.
>
> The Apache Ambari project has been incubating since August 2011.
> We have made sig
+1
thanks
mahadev
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Yusaku Sako wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator.
>
> The Apache Ambari project has been incubating since August 2011.
> We have made significant progr
On 11/17/13 3:17 AM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>
>With a two tier model - with PPMC membership granting voting rights on
>podling releases, then a podling would start with just mentors on its
>PPMC. If you clearly knew what you were doing, you'd get voted onto the
>PPMC pretty quickly, and thus you'd
Joining a PMC does not meaning being handed even one of the keys to
the launch console for a nuclear missile. Joining a PMC means
accepting responsibility for the supervision of a project. We vote to
add someone to a PMC when they have shown the necessary commitment
and, well, common sense. Part of
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 04:59 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/16/13 8:47 AM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >Alex,
> >
> >I'm not sure I see the difference between a release auditor and an IPMC
> >member. If someone is sufficiently clued up to audit a release, then
> >they're surely r
16 matches
Mail list logo
