Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-17 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/17/13 10:38 AM, "Upayavira" wrote: > >Also, any ASF member can ask to join the Incubator PMC. So, "any ASF >member" can technically review any vote, simply by sending an email to >the Incubator PMC private list - so we have that situation already. I'd >have no issue with members of other

Re: Transition Incubator dist area

2013-11-17 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:09 PM, David Crossley wrote: > One thing that would help is to also clear the clutter. > > Clutch has been alerting to old releases hanging around. > http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#other > There are many in that list with the entry: > "Has graduated, but still h

Re: [PROPOSAL] Phoenix for Incubation

2013-11-17 Thread James Taylor
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >* I am sure with the name like Phoenix there's tons of clashes, > but perhaps Apache Phoenix should be fine We'd be fine with "Apache Phoenix". >* How tightly coupled is it with HBase? IOW, do you anticipate > needing to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Phoenix for Incubation

2013-11-17 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:43 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We're pleased to share a draft ASF incubation proposal for Phoenix, a > > SQL layer over HBase, initially developed at Salesforce.com and > > subsequently open s

Re: [PROPOSAL] Phoenix for Incubation

2013-11-17 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:43 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Hi All, > > We're pleased to share a draft ASF incubation proposal for Phoenix, a > SQL layer over HBase, initially developed at Salesforce.com and > subsequently open sourced on github > (https://github.com/forcedotcom/phoenix). Instead of u

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-17 Thread Benson Margulies
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Upayavira wrote: > Benson, > > How does that relate to my post? Not sure if I can see the connection. I thought I was replying to Alex, but my sentiment is applicable to what you write below. The IPMC is a group of people with a job. It's not a 'project community

Re: Transition Incubator dist area

2013-11-17 Thread David Crossley
Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Hello general@incubator, > > Infra has requested that we perform some cleanup of our distribution area. > Earlier this week, both Allura and VXQuery experienced difficulties with > synchronization between their dist.apache.org release directories and the > main mirror at <

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-17 Thread Upayavira
Marvin, you have my wholehearted agreement. Upayavira On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 07:18 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > 1) I think there is more to PPMC membership than just voting on releases. > > I'm sure that everyone agrees on this point 1

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-17 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > 1) I think there is more to PPMC membership than just voting on releases. I'm sure that everyone agrees on this point 100%. Everything that Benson had to say a couple messages back about PMC membership[1] also applies to PPMC membership. Nev

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-17 Thread Upayavira
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 03:41 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/17/13 3:17 AM, "Upayavira" wrote: > > > > >With a two tier model - with PPMC membership granting voting rights on > >podling releases, then a podling would start with just mentors on its > >PPMC. If you clearly knew what you wer

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-17 Thread Upayavira
Benson, How does that relate to my post? Not sure if I can see the connection. Are you suggesting that we should be okay voting PPMC members who are taking responsibility within their project into the Incubator PMC? To me, that would be equivalent to granting a new committer ASF membership while

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator

2013-11-17 Thread Arun C. Murthy
> > [ ] +1 Graduate Ambari from Incubator +1 for graduation (binding) thanks, Arun > On Nov 15, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Yusaku Sako wrote: > > This is a call for vote to graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator. > > The Apache Ambari project has been incubating since August 2011. > We have made sig

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator

2013-11-17 Thread Mahadev Konar
+1 thanks mahadev Mahadev Konar Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Yusaku Sako wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator. > > The Apache Ambari project has been incubating since August 2011. > We have made significant progr

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-17 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/17/13 3:17 AM, "Upayavira" wrote: > >With a two tier model - with PPMC membership granting voting rights on >podling releases, then a podling would start with just mentors on its >PPMC. If you clearly knew what you were doing, you'd get voted onto the >PPMC pretty quickly, and thus you'd

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-17 Thread Benson Margulies
Joining a PMC does not meaning being handed even one of the keys to the launch console for a nuclear missile. Joining a PMC means accepting responsibility for the supervision of a project. We vote to add someone to a PMC when they have shown the necessary commitment and, well, common sense. Part of

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-17 Thread Upayavira
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 04:59 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/16/13 8:47 AM, "Upayavira" wrote: > > > > > > > > >Alex, > > > >I'm not sure I see the difference between a release auditor and an IPMC > >member. If someone is sufficiently clued up to audit a release, then > >they're surely r