[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

2013-11-09 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, the vote to release RC4 as Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 passes after more than 72 hours with 3 +1 votes of IPMC members (Jochen Wiedmann, Ant Elder, Marvin Humphrey) and no 0 or -1 votes. The vote thread on vxquery-dev can be found here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-v

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating RC3

2013-11-09 Thread Hyunsik Choi
Dear IPMC members, If there are some reasons why you do not vote, please leave reasons here. I would like to proceed or cancel this vote. Best regards, Hyunsik Choi On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Are there other IPMC members who are willing to review this release? We nee

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-09 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Dave Brondsema wrote: > On 11/09/2013 02:23 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: >> If mentors are not performing their duties to vote on a given releases for >> a podling, then it is up to the IPMC as a whole to help that podling by >> doing the do diligence and casting a vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

2013-11-09 Thread Vinayak Borkar
Marvin, Thanks a ton for this vote. Now we have 3 +1s from IPMC members as summarized below: +1 (binding) Jochen Wiedmann Ant Elder Marvin Humphrey -1 none Vinayak On 11/9/13, 9:08 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Till wrote: [ ] +1 release this package a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

2013-11-09 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Till wrote: > [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating > [ ] -1 do not release this package because ... `LICENSE` looks good. Appropriate pointer to ODC-BY. `NOTICE` looks good. Copyright up to date. Appropriate ASF citation. Copyright for

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-09 Thread Joseph Schaefer
The reason we are reduced to guesswork and posturing about how to fix what ails us is because we haven’t a clue what the core problems with incubation are. All we have are a rash of symptoms: inadequate release voting oversight, inadequate podling community development, etc. It sure would’ve been

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.1

2013-11-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
Agreed. Not a blocker: Still +1 On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote: > On 11/8/13 6:17 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> On 11/04/2013 07:09 PM, Cory Johns wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.1 incubating. This is our >>> second attempt at an initial r

Re: [VOTE] Accept Twill for Incubation

2013-11-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 11/08/2013 06:49 AM, Ashish wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote: The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like to call

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-09 Thread Dave Brondsema
On 11/09/2013 02:23 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > We have a process in place which graduates a given incubating project to > TLP, why add a middle layer with a pTLP? There are enough steps in the > process, pTLP is not needed in my opinion. > I wholeheartedly agree. Adding more layers of projects or

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-09 Thread Dave Brondsema
On 11/09/2013 03:38 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi Marvin > > Am 09.11.13 07:15, schrieb Marvin Humphrey: >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Upayavira wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 08:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: IMO the IPMC cannot delegate legal oversight to a sub-committee (for

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

2013-11-09 Thread sebb
On 9 November 2013 07:06, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi, > > Someday I will get back to improving the Voting and Glossary pages, but > meanwhile, the Apache Flex PMC is still trying to construct a set of > bylaws and we are currently discussing whether there is a difference > between "Majority Approval"

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

2013-11-09 Thread Upayavira
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013, at 07:06 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi, > > Someday I will get back to improving the Voting and Glossary pages, but > meanwhile, the Apache Flex PMC is still trying to construct a set of > bylaws and we are currently discussing whether there is a difference > between "Majority

Re: [VOTE] Accept Twill for Incubation

2013-11-09 Thread Suresh Marru
+1 (binding). Suresh On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote: > The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the > discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like > to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project. > > The pr

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

2013-11-09 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi Marvin Am 09.11.13 07:15, schrieb Marvin Humphrey: On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Upayavira wrote: On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 08:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: IMO the IPMC cannot delegate legal oversight to a sub-committee (for example) unless that sub-committee consisted of members of the IPM