+1
Regards
JB
On 10/02/2013 01:01 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
So Apache Merlin sounds good to me.
Any objections?
On 25 September 2013 23:47, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Nechtan sounds cool also. Please note, in the german wikipedia its
translated with "The tremendousness". This is not noted on t
(Apologies if you get this twice. I'm having email issues)
Doug,
The thread on members@ was titled "Committer Qualifications". I asked a
question about the -1 vote on 9/7/13 and the reply I got was that
committer voting does not have vetoes, and the document at [1] also seems
to say that.
The d
Greets,
Please welcome new shepherds Andrei Savu and Raphael Bircher! We look forward
to the fresh perspectives you bring.
Here are assignments for our October report, which have also been posted on
the wiki page.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2013
Raphael Bircher Olingo
+1, sounds like the logo idea will be easy ;)
Le 2 oct. 2013 01:01, "Olivier Lamy" a écrit :
> So Apache Merlin sounds good to me.
> Any objections?
>
> On 25 September 2013 23:47, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
> > Nechtan sounds cool also. Please note, in the german wikipedia its
> > translated
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>
> The original proposal has been revised to name Dave Johnson as th
Lots of people on this list are also on members@, and, so far, none have
objected to my statements. If this continues, it would indicate a lack of
controversy.
Doug
On Oct 1, 2013 7:36 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I don't find the discussion on members@ that comes to this conclusion.
>
Hi,
> I don't find the discussion on members@ that comes to this conclusion. If
> you cannot see members@ how do you know this?
I was informed by a member on Flex private and here [1] which you already
responded to.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://markmail.org/thread/chfagblj72cv7zrt
-
I don't find the discussion on members@ that comes to this conclusion. If
you cannot see members@ how do you know this?
Doug
On Oct 1, 2013 6:06 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I see no discrepancy between the documents you cite. The first says
> > that committer votes are by consensus,
Hi,
> I see no discrepancy between the documents you cite. The first says
> that committer votes are by consensus, the second says that
> "procedural" votes are by majority, but doesn't define procedural and
> there's no implication that it includes committer votes.
There was conversation on mem
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> The whole reason this come about is because it's unclear what voting rules
> are the default when voting someone in as committer. See [1] (consensus) and
> [2] (majority). If -1 is a veto or not is sort of important thing to know,
> and wh
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 to Marvin's "I hope that most projects won't bother" although there
> > needs to be something a little more than a blank piece of paper.
> >
> > The best approach, IMHO, is to simply make it official that t
So Apache Merlin sounds good to me.
Any objections?
On 25 September 2013 23:47, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Nechtan sounds cool also. Please note, in the german wikipedia its
> translated with "The tremendousness". This is not noted on the english
> wikipedia. After reading wikipedia I am still
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback, it's interesting to see that some project don't have
bylaws.
The whole reason this come about is because it's unclear what voting rules are
the default when voting someone in as committer. See [1] (consensus) and [2]
(majority). If -1 is a veto or not is sort of i
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> At Wicket we didn't bother to pick bylaws and from what I have seen in
> other communities we are better for it.
A huge +1 to that! Apache Bigtop falls into the very same category -- we'll
get real bylaws when we really need them (hopefull
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 09/30/2013 09:27 PM, Dave wrote:
I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
The original proposal has been revised to name Dave Johnson as th
On 1 October 2013 18:07, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Seb,
>
> Thanks for the update:
>
> 1/ KEYS file is here:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/kalumet/tags/kalumet-0.6-incubating/KEYS
>
> 2/ SVN URLs:
>
> SCM Codebase:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/kalumet/branches
Hi Seb,
Thanks for the update:
1/ KEYS file is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/kalumet/tags/kalumet-0.6-incubating/KEYS
2/ SVN URLs:
SCM Codebase:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/kalumet/branches/0.6.x/
Release Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/kalumet/
On 30 September 2013 11:17, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> After several months of work since the last incubating release
> (3.0.0-incubating) in April, we are now ready to release version
> 3.1.0-incubating. We fixed all the remaining issues that have been
> discussed in April (see th
On 1 October 2013 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release has been voted by the Kalumet podling
> PMC.
>
> I forward the release to the Incubator for "final" vote. Please find the
> RELEASE NOTES and staging repository in the original message.
>
> Tha
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>
+1 (binding)
--
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Raminder Singh wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks
> Raminder
>
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Dave wrote:
>
> > I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> > Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> +1 to Marvin's "I hope that most projects won't bother" although there
> needs to be something a little more than a blank piece of paper.
>
> The best approach, IMHO, is to simply make it official that the project
> adopts the same byelaws as p
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks
Raminder
On Sep 30, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>
> The original proposal has been r
The vote for Aurora to become an incubated project has passed with 8 +1
binding votes, 8 +1 non-binding votes, and no -1 or 0 votes.
*Binding +1 Votes:*
Jake Farrell
Henry Saputra
Benjamin Hindman
Chris Mattmann
Alan D. Cabrera
Andrei Savu
Olivier Lamy
Bertrand Delacretaz
*Non-Binding +1 Votes:*
+1 to Marvin's "I hope that most projects won't bother" although there
needs to be something a little more than a blank piece of paper.
The best approach, IMHO, is to simply make it official that the project
adopts the same byelaws as project x, y or z. Pick an established project
that has a minim
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jordan Zimmerman
wrote:
> Wow. I missed that. I'll work omit for Curator. I'd like to see the grad doc
> updated to mention this.
I hope that most projects won't bother. We need rules because we need a
framework to resolve disagreements, but bylaws are really hard
Wow. I missed that. I'll work omit for Curator. I'd like to see the grad doc
updated to mention this.
Jordan Zimmerman
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:21 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I reckon that this is one of the initial steps of becoming a
>> top-level project (TLP)
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Lieven Govaerts
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> > I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> > Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> > APIs, as an Apache Incubat
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>
+1 (non-binding)
I hope to be able to contribute to this project dur
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 03:27:24PM -0400, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
+1 (binding)
Hi all,
Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release has been voted by the Kalumet
podling PMC.
I forward the release to the Incubator for "final" vote. Please find the
RELEASE NOTES and staging repository in the original message.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
Original Message
Subject: [VO
33 matches
Mail list logo
