Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 for Balder not baldur in french (add a a and that's weird ;) Le 20 sept. 2013 03:23, "Olivier Lamy" a écrit : > So It looks we have more interested folks. > But before starting the vote I'd like to find an other name for the > project. > Someone proposed "Baldur" or "Balder" (note, It's a popu

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-19 Thread Ashish
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > So It looks we have more interested folks. > But before starting the vote I'd like to find an other name for the > project. > Someone proposed "Baldur" or "Balder" (note, It's a popular germanic > god). So as a French guy this proposition loo

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-19 Thread Olivier Lamy
So It looks we have more interested folks. But before starting the vote I'd like to find an other name for the project. Someone proposed "Baldur" or "Balder" (note, It's a popular germanic god). So as a French guy this proposition looks to be rude for me :-). More seriously, this name doesn't hurt

Re: binary release artifacts

2013-09-19 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Joseph Schaefer wrote: > Agreed. Convenience binaries have always been distributed on our mirrors. > Only the corresponding source tarball requires a vote. I suppose this thread has clarified what level of quality our users have a right to expect from "convenien

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

2013-09-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
hehe right. thks *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau * *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/9/19 Matt Benson >

Re: binary release artifacts

2013-09-19 Thread Luciano Resende
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:40 PM, ant elder wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Marvin Humphrey >wrote: > > > > As Tim and Luciano have already stated, artifacts which were not voted on > > by > > the IPMC cannot continue to be distributed though our channels. > > > > > Is that actually th

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

2013-09-19 Thread Matt Benson
I discussed this with Romain and someone else (can't recall who) before he submitted this proposal. My knee-jerk response was that a software grant would be required, but then recalled the discussion at [1]. This leaves the impression that the podling could proceed with merely IBM's good will, wh

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

2013-09-19 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi john, please have a look at [1]. regards, gerhard [1] http://s.apache.org/Ns7 2013/9/19 John D. Ament > Just wondering, even though the RI is ASL2, do we need to get IP > clearance to fork? > > I think this last came up with BeanShell. > > John > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Matt

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

2013-09-19 Thread Gerhard Petracek
easybatch is used by others already. regards, gerhard 2013/9/19 Romain Manni-Bucau > Ok guys, if I have 2 others +1 I update the proposal ;) (I think you are > right, that's why i proposed it) > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * > *Blog: **http

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

2013-09-19 Thread John D. Ament
Just wondering, even though the RI is ASL2, do we need to get IP clearance to fork? I think this last came up with BeanShell. John On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > JSR 352 is part of Java EE 7, so BatchEE is IMO warranted. Plus the > rhyming of "Apache BatchEE" is silly a

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

2013-09-19 Thread Matt Benson
JSR 352 is part of Java EE 7, so BatchEE is IMO warranted. Plus the rhyming of "Apache BatchEE" is silly and fun. $0.02, Matt On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Gerhard Petracek < gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > easybatch is used by others already. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2013/9/19

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

2013-09-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Ok guys, if I have 2 others +1 I update the proposal ;) (I think you are right, that's why i proposed it) *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau * *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.co

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

2013-09-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1, to be honest, I prefer EasyBatch as BatchEE sounds like related to JavaEE which can be confusing for the users. Regards JB On 09/19/2013 01:31 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Discussing with a colleague he proposed me another name: EasyBatch. Personally I like BatchEE but EasyBatch sounds qu

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

2013-09-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Discussing with a colleague he proposed me another name: EasyBatch. Personally I like BatchEE but EasyBatch sounds quite fun even if maybe too close to RestEasy ;) wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-19 Thread Isabel Drost-Fromm
+1 (binding) Isabel On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:29:46PM -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: > We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone release. > > The vote thread can be found here: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201309.mbox/%3ccaka9qdkmxjp-r8v+zwa