Re: binary release artifacts

2013-09-18 Thread Joseph Schaefer
Agreed. Convenience binaries have always been distributed on our mirrors. Only the corresponding source tarball requires a vote. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 19, 2013, at 2:40 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > >> As Tim and Luciano have alr

Re: binary release artifacts

2013-09-18 Thread ant elder
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > As Tim and Luciano have already stated, artifacts which were not voted on > by > the IPMC cannot continue to be distributed though our channels. > Is that actually the case? AIUI the ASF only releases open source code. We vote on the sou

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-18 Thread Ted Dunning
It is in version control as per custom. Drill uses git so it might not be quite as obvious if you are used to SVN. See, for instance, https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-drill.git;a=blob;f=KEYS;h=205469b84b8bda60fcb87486182d4fb7caf0485d;hb=HEAD On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:25 PM,

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-18 Thread Dave Brondsema
Do you have a KEYS file posted somewhere besides within the release? On 09/17/2013 06:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone release. > > The vote thread can be found here: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201309.

[VOTE]: Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-18 Thread Shreepadma Venugopalan
This vote is being concurrently called on dev@sentry.incubator.apache.organd general@incubator.apache.org. This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version 1.2.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues: goo.gl/Bx5D1x Source files : http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0

Re: binary release artifacts

2013-09-18 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > Thank you Elder for filing the LEGAL-178. Tim, the link provided is for > source file headers and reference to Apache distribution of source code > tarball. We will wait for LEGAL-178 to be resolved to react. This implies > that Apache OpenOff

Re: binary release artifacts

2013-09-18 Thread Eric Yang
Thank you Elder for filing the LEGAL-178. Tim, the link provided is for source file headers and reference to Apache distribution of source code tarball. We will wait for LEGAL-178 to be resolved to react. This implies that Apache OpenOffice is also not doing the right thing. OpenOffice has its

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-18 Thread Henry Saputra
Signature looks good Hashes looks good +1 (binding) Congrats for the first release guys - Henry On Tuesday, September 17, 2013, Ted Dunning wrote: > We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone release. > > The vote thread can be found here: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.o

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

2013-09-18 Thread Cory Johns
We are canceling the vote for this release to address the license and procedure issues raised. Thanks, Cory On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:43 PM, sebb wrote: > On 28 August 2013 23:04, Cory Johns wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.0 incubating. This is our >

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-18 Thread Ted Dunning
This vote has been open for nearly 24 hours out of 72 hours and has just over 48 hours to run. This is a tickler in case somebody wants to vote, but has been distracted. The current tally is 4 binding +1, 1 ambiguous, none against. On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > We've

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-18 Thread Ted Dunning
Thanks for reviewing at all! Even more thanks for reviewing when you should be sleeping. On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > Benson, > > > > The disclaimer is in the README now: > > Which is to say, README.md.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-18 Thread Doug Cutting
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. This passes, with lots of +1 votes (plenty by PMC members) and no -1 votes. Thanks for voting. Doug -

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-18 Thread Benson Margulies
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Benson, > > The disclaimer is in the README now: Which is to say, README.md. OK, I was too tired last night. -1 -> +1. > > README.md:Apache Drill is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache >> Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-18 Thread Sajeevan Achuthan
+1 (non-binding) On 14 September 2013 14:03, Sharad Agarwal wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > > seemingly resolved. > > > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-18 Thread Ted Dunning
Benson, The disclaimer is in the README now: README.md:Apache Drill is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache > Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator. Incubation is > required of all newly accepted projects until a further review indicates > that the infrastructure,

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-18 Thread Benson Margulies
-1 binding. I don't see the standard disclaimer in any of the possible locations. In Maven, the standard disclaimer as a remote resource via org.apache:apache-incubator-disclaimer-resource-bundle. The text looks like: #if(${projectName})${projectName}#else${project.name}#end is an effort undergo

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-18 Thread Grant Ingersoll
+1, binding On Sep 17, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone release. > > The vote thread can be found here: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201309.mbox/%3ccaka9qdkmxjp-r8v+zwabm5e4b5osrypjyp+dupvq2

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-18 Thread Steve Loughran
+1 ship it (binding) On 17 September 2013 23:29, Ted Dunning wrote: > We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone release. > > The vote thread can be found here: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201309.mbox/%3ccaka9qdkmxjp-r8v+zwabm5e4b5osrypj

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-18 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > htt