Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Suresh Srinivas
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > htt

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Hitesh Shah
+1. -- Hitesh On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Tom White
+1 Tom On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.ap

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Suresh Marru
+ 1 (binding). Good to see the project coming to ASF. Suresh On Sep 12, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013, at 02:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Tomaz Muraus
+1 (binding) On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi The gui is optional but a big added value for me. Rrd is on the radar (Olivier spoke about it first) Le 13 sept. 2013 20:43, "Tammo van Lessen" a écrit : > Hi Romain, > > cool, count me in. Though, I still have some questions: 1. linked to the > GUI: does this mean, that it won't work without

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Arvind Prabhakar
[X] +1 Accept Storm into the Incubator Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The pro

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Andrew Hart
+1 (binding) Andrew. On 9/12/13 9:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now seemingly resolved. I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. The proposal is included below and is also at: https://wiki.apache.org/i

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-13 Thread Tammo van Lessen
Hi Romain, cool, count me in. Though, I still have some questions: 1. linked to the GUI: does this mean, that it won't work without the GUI, i.e. it is not planned to provide reporters that push data to statsd, graphite, librato et al? Or does it just mean, that GUI is also in the focus? 2. Persis

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-13 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 13 September 2013 15:51, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > it sounds really interested, and it's a feature that I would expect in > Kalumet. > > I'm really interested to join ! I just added you as a mentor. > > Regards > JB > > > On 09/13/2013 02:10 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> >> H

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi we use jmx too ATM. My opinion after some work is sharing counter/gauge is loosing energy for few gain but if licence is compatible why not... Le 13 sept. 2013 19:28, "Chris Geer" a écrit : > This seems to be similar to the Netflix Servo project [1]. They chose to > expose the data over JMX in

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Alex Karasulu
+1 (binding) On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > 2013년 9월 13일 금요일에 Doug Cutting님이 작성: > >> Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now >> seemingly resolved. >> >> I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. >

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-13 Thread Chris Geer
This seems to be similar to the Netflix Servo project [1]. They chose to expose the data over JMX instead of a web site but the collection seems like it has similar concepts. Maybe there is a possibility of providing value added services on top of it? Like aggregation, reporting Chris [1] htt

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi basis are close to metrics but it has some few differences: 1) it is extensible by design and linked to the GUI 2) we will handle persistence of counters/gauges 3) we will handle aggregation and hopefully much more ;) Then I hope we will integrate it deeply with other Apache project (tomee, jb

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote > ...I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional comma

Re: [Drill] - Re: Shepherd assignments, September 2013

2013-09-13 Thread Ted Dunning
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Thanks to Dave for his long record of contributing as a shepherd. > Indeed. And thanks to Dave for checking out Drill. More eyes on a project is always a good thing.

Re: [Drill] - Re: Shepherd assignments, September 2013

2013-09-13 Thread Ted Dunning
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Sorry for any consternation. Best of luck. I do think that once your > podling does release that TLP status should come soon. > I would say that we have a little more practice needed in incubator. But the progress is happening. One issue t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Jake Farrell
+1 On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.apach

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-13 Thread Tammo van Lessen
Sounds interesting. I'm curious how this is related to other metrics libraries, like Coda Hale's [1]. Does it have a similar scope? Thanks, Tammo [1] http://metrics.codahale.com/ On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi Folks, > Below is a proposal for a new incubator proje

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Olivier, it sounds really interested, and it's a feature that I would expect in Kalumet. I'm really interested to join ! Regards JB On 09/13/2013 02:10 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi Folks, Below is a proposal for a new incubator project called Apache Monitoring. (the name will certainly cha

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
+1 binding. Good luck guys! ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mat

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Bruno Mahé
On 09/12/2013 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now seemingly resolved. I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. The proposal is included below and is also at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StormPropo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Victor Hugo Borja
+1 On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.apach

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
+ 1 -Sebastien On 13 Sep 2013, at 00:04, Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now >> seemingly resolved. >> >> I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new In

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Hyunsik Choi
+1 (non binding) 2013년 9월 13일 금요일에 Doug Cutting님이 작성: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Joe Stein
+1 (non-binding) /*** Joe Stein Founder, Principal Consultant Big Data Open Source Security LLC http://www.stealth.ly Twitter: @allthingshadoop / On Thu, Sep 12, 2013

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-13 Thread Supun Kamburugamuva
+1 Supun.. On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > +1 > > Craig > > On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > > seemingly resolved. > > > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incu