That makes sense. Thanks for the update - I am still catching up on my emails
backed up because of the Hadoop summit.
Cos
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:44AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote:
> Dear Konstantin,
>
> Thanks! The incoming Spark project is excited about the relationship
> with Bigtop tha
Ahh no no that's right, sorry! You called it a "staging repo", which
confused me since normally it's like a "release candidate is posted
here" blah blah.
You are fine Jordan, and I am +1 (binding) on the release:
SIGS check out:
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-curator-2.1.0] mattmann% $HOME/bin/stage_ap
Thanks Joe for explaining the process! I will remember that for the next
release.
We now have 2 binding votes from the IPMC. Only one more is needed.
Regards,
-- Andrei Savu
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013, at 04:10 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> > On
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013, at 04:10 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Dave Fisher
> wrote:
>
> > This link doesn't help determine who has voted from the PPMC nor does it
> > provide a count of how many votes and by whom.
> >
> > Have you had any IPMC/binding votes?
> >
>
> My
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a vote for the release of Apache Curator, version 2.1.0-incubating.
>
> This has been voted on via the d...@curator.incubator.apache.org mailing
> list and now requires a vote on @general.
>
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is a vote for the release of Apache Curator, version
> > 2.1.0-incubating.
>
> ...
>
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and r
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a vote for the release of Apache Curator, version
> 2.1.0-incubating.
...
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
+1 (binding)
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Tw
The bits are staged here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/curator/2.1.0-incubating/
Is that a problem?
Jordan Zimmerman
On Jun 28, 2013, at 3:50 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)"
wrote:
> Hi Jordan,
>
> I'd be happy to review this, but can you please stage
Hi Jordan,
I'd be happy to review this, but can you please stage the sources
and sign them with your ASC key so I know what bits I'm voting on?
You provided the link to the tag in Git which is great, but I'd like
to see the bits staged to your p.a.o (old method) account, or to
http://www.apache.or
On Jun 28, 2013, at 6:43 AM, Florian Müller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About two weeks ago, Stephan presented the Apache Olingo (OData) proposal [1].
> There has been a bit of a discussion about the name and the diversity of the
> initial committers. The name has been changed from OData to Olingo and on
Hi,
About two weeks ago, Stephan presented the Apache Olingo (OData)
proposal [1].
There has been a bit of a discussion about the name and the diversity
of the initial committers. The name has been changed from OData to
Olingo and one new initial committer from a different company has been
ad
Hi Karthik,
Yes it is. You can join by sending blank emails to:
dev-subscr...@spark.incubator.apache.org
commits-subscr...@spark.incubator.apache.org
Cheers!
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propul
12 matches
Mail list logo
