Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

On May 27, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, ant elder wrote: >> ...Half the committers are ASF >> members so they know what they're doing already, we're not going to teach >> Sebb anything new about doing releases... > > Indeed ;-) > >> ...All th

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

+1 (binding) Ralph On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Dear ASF members, > > We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator. > > The proposal draft is available at: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal, > follows below the proposal > > Open is open for

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > I think the terms mean different things, from the incubator perspective. > > Dormant - we're not active enough right now for a full community, but > believe later on we can build it back up. > Retired - we've given up all hope of becoming a T

AW: Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

+1 for this interpretation -- John D. Ament schrieb am Mo., 27. Mai 2013 21:17 MESZ: >I think the terms mean different things, from the incubator perspective. > >Dormant - we're not active enough right now for a full community, but >believe later on we can build it

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

I think the terms mean different things, from the incubator perspective. Dormant - we're not active enough right now for a full community, but believe later on we can build it back up. Retired - we've given up all hope of becoming a TLP, instead we think it's best to archive the code/move it to gi

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > Yeah, I like the word dormant as well. Should we rename them all to dormant? +1 from me. So far I don't see any difference in the end. > > Regards, > Alan > > On May 27, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Upayavira wrote: > >> I think it was just a ques

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

Yeah, I like the word dormant as well. Should we rename them all to dormant? Regards, Alan On May 27, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Upayavira wrote: > I think it was just a question of 'retiring' sounding too final. Using > the word 'dormant' was less threatening, and made it more feasible for > the pod

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

I think it was just a question of 'retiring' sounding too final. Using the word 'dormant' was less threatening, and made it more feasible for the podlings to go, well, dormant. Upayavira On Mon, May 27, 2013, at 05:39 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > They kinda sound the same. Why didn't podlings want

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

They kinda sound the same. Why didn't podlings want to retire? Does anyone know? Regards, Alan On May 27, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > I asked the same question in july 2011, and got a response from Henri > Yandell which I repost here: > > "Given the PPMC is closed down,

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

I asked the same question in july 2011, and got a response from Henri Yandell which I repost here: "Given the PPMC is closed down, I think it has to be retired. Dormant implies a PPMC is taking some time off. Basically this is a larger version of "don't be afraid to delete a line of code; it's i

What's the difference between dormant and retired?

Looking at the podlings.xml and it's not clear to me what the difference is. I'm sure I neglected to read some documentation bit. Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-126) Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13667806#comment-13667806 ] Alan Cabrera commented on INCUBATOR-126: That's a good idea. I think we should

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-126) Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13667801#comment-13667801 ] John D. Ament commented on INCUBATOR-126: - It also states (one line up) The tr

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-126) Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13667778#comment-13667778 ] Alan Cabrera commented on INCUBATOR-126: Yes, the VP of Branding *may* approve

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-126) Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13667772#comment-13667772 ] John D. Ament commented on INCUBATOR-126: - Isn't it stated here? http://www.ap

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-126) Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name

Alan Cabrera created INCUBATOR-126: -- Summary: Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name Key: INCUBATOR-126 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126 Project: Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, ant elder wrote: > ...Half the committers are ASF > members so they know what they're doing already, we're not going to teach > Sebb anything new about doing releases... Indeed ;-) > ...All thats needed is a software grant and IP clearance (which from the > previ