AUTO: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM is out of the office until 06/03/2013. (returning 06/03/2013)

2013-05-25 Thread Richard Schwerdtfeger
I am out of the office until 06/03/2013. I am traveling for work with limited access to email. Thanks, Rich Note: This is an automated response to your message "How many people are supervising IP clearance?" sent on 05/18/2013 10:10:09 AM. This is the only notification you will receive whil

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

2013-05-25 Thread Luciano Resende
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Vinod Kone wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos > (incubating) > version 0.11.0. This will be the third incubator release for Mesos in Apache > . > > The candidate for Mesos 0.11.0-incubating release is available at: > > http://

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

2013-05-25 Thread Dave Fisher
+1. Binding. Sent from my iPhone On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Dear ASF members, > > We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator. > > The proposal draft is available at: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal, > follows below the proposal > >

Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

2013-05-25 Thread Vinod Kone
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos (incubating) version 0.11.0. This will be the third incubator release for Mesos in Apache . The candidate for Mesos 0.11.0-incubating release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkone/mesos-0.11.0-incubating-RC2/mesos-0.1

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

2013-05-25 Thread Pedro Giffuni
+1 Pedro Giffuni On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Dear ASF members, > > We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator. > > The proposal draft is available at: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal, > follows below the proposal > > Open is open for at

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

2013-05-25 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 in that case as well. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Bertrand Delacretaz > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Friday, 24 May 2013, 16:59 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Patrick Niemeyer

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

2013-05-25 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 24/05/2013 Simone Tripodi wrote: open for at least 72h and closes approximately on May 27th at 8:20am GMT [ ] +1 accept BeanShell in the Incubator [ ] ±0 [ ] -1 because (provide a reason) +1 accept BeanShell in the Incubator (non-binding) Andrea

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

2013-05-25 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1 on incubation then. Thanks for telling us, Patrick Please note: while incubation BeanShell needs to do the "name search process" which is explained here: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html You'll most likely asked again on this, but it should be straightforward now On Fri, Ma

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

2013-05-25 Thread ant elder
Its good that we can help keep BeanShell going by bring it to the ASF, but my vote here is -1. There was some discussion on this proposal back in April and one of the last emails there was this one saying: "If the intention is to have Beanshell become a part of Apache Commons then the IPMC feels