[ANNOUNCE] Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating released

2013-05-15 Thread Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
The Apache JSPWiki team is pleased to announce the release of JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating from the Apache Incubator. This is the second release of Apache JSPWiki, a feature-rich and extensible WikiWiki engine built around the standard J2EE components. The release is available here: http://www.apache

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Helix 0.6.1-incubating

2013-05-15 Thread Shi Lu
Hi: Closing the vote since it has passed 72 hours. Here is the result: +1: 3 (binding) Patrick Hunt Olivier Lamy Mahadev Konar -1: 0 The vote has passed, thanks a lot for everyone for voting, Thanks to the mentors for all the support! Cheers, The Helix team On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:35 PM,

Possible focal point: decision-making

2013-05-15 Thread Benson Margulies
If you look at proposals and email, you will notice that several people who disagree on many things agree that this group has trouble making decisions by consensus, due to size, diversity, and perhaps sheer orneriness. One possibility is to focus on the ideas in Bertrand's document that address de

Re: The Only Thing Wrong - Execution of Process

2013-05-15 Thread Alan Cabrera
I think there's some good ideas here. You should capture them in http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013 Regards, Alan On May 15, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > I've been incredibly busy, but to me the main thing wrong in the Incubator is > focusing on what m

The Only Thing Wrong - Execution of Process

2013-05-15 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - I've been incredibly busy, but to me the main thing wrong in the Incubator is focusing on what might be wrong rather than executing on the process we already have (or had). Shepherds worked when they were assigned at random by the IPMC chair well in advance of the report. This helps to fo

Re: YAMP to fix the Incubator (*)

2013-05-15 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote: > ...Thanks can you please identify how my proposal isn't granular? It suggests > next steps about > 5 of them and then lists shifts in responsibility around 10 or more of then > with > applicable next steps The "deconstruct t