On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Eric Johnson wrote:
> If this was a software project, and the appropriate answer was unknown, they
> you might apply a "lean startup" approach, and figure out how to run tests
> to see which way works best.
>
> Given the number of incubating projects, should be eas
On May 10, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>> I'm currently writing some tooling to help with the incubation process as
>> well as mail list moderator tools
>
> Cool!
>
> https://whimsy.apache.org/ might be a good inte
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> I think that you should make it clear that the Marvin machinery broke down
> and projects did not get their notifications.
Didn't the last email on the subject contradict that idea?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On May 10, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Ben
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> I'm currently writing some tooling to help with the incubation process as
> well as mail list moderator tools
Cool!
https://whimsy.apache.org/ might be a good integration point for such tools.
-Bertrand
---
I'm currently writing some tooling to help with the incubation process as well
as mail list moderator tools.
The first thing that I'm writing is a command that will print out who is the
owner of an email alias and what projects they belong to and if they are ASF
members. This will help me vet
I think that you should make it clear that the Marvin machinery broke down and
projects did not get their notifications.
Regards,
Alan
On May 10, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I wrote some text at the front. I plan to fill in things like PMC
> members coming and going tomorrow m
Lean startup approaches make sense when you do not know the problem that you're
solving. You perform experiments and pivot as you blindly search for a domain
whose problems you can solve and make money doing it.
Here, we know what our problems are.
This is not to say that we should not collect
On May 10, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> So, here we have:
>
> Alan's idea of removing champions and shepherds and demanding mentor
> recommitment, with the 'teeth' of putting podlings on ice if they
> can't muster an adequate mentor squad.
>
> My idea of asking champions to step
If this was a software project, and the appropriate answer was unknown,
they you might apply a "lean startup" approach, and figure out how to
run tests to see which way works best.
Given the number of incubating projects, should be easy to run some
experiments. Then you just need to build up s
On Monday, May 6, 2013, Chip Childers wrote:
> Citrix has donated the source code artifact detailed at [1] to the ASF.
> This email is to request lazy consensus from the IPMC for the IP
> clearance of this donation.
>
> Please reply with questions or concerns if there are any.
>
> -chip
>
> [1]
>
So, here we have:
Alan's idea of removing champions and shepherds and demanding mentor
recommitment, with the 'teeth' of putting podlings on ice if they
can't muster an adequate mentor squad.
My idea of asking champions to step up to some specific supervision
responsibility, thus allowing some fl
+1 (binding) sig/xsum verify. rat runs clean. I've run through the
release checklist and everything seems fine to me.
Patrick
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is the *fifth* release candidate for Apache S4, version 0.6.0
>
> We fixed 2 blocking issues wrt R
I wrote some text at the front. I plan to fill in things like PMC
members coming and going tomorrow morning, and commit to svn.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ge
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>
> Sebb is awesome.
>
+1
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comman
This vote has passed. - Steve
On May 6, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> SooMyung Lee has offered to contribute a Korean morphological analyzer to the
> Apache Lucene project.
>
> The contributed code is attached to the LUCENE-4956 JIRA issue[1], which is
> being used to track developmen
+1 (non-binding)
* verified signature and checksums
* only changes from previous RC are documentation related
* ran tests
On Thu May 9 22:56:47 2013, kishore g wrote:
+1
verified sigs
built code, tools and ran tests
rat check passed
Thanks,
Kishore G
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Matthie
16 matches
Mail list logo
