Re: [VOTE] recommend Apache DeltaSpike for graduating out of the incubator

2013-03-30 Thread Sergio Fernández
+1 (non-binding) On 30/03/13 17:54, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi! The Apache DeltaSpike podling is a project which contains common CDI Extensions which are portable among many different Java EE containers and even run on standalone CDI containers. We are now incubating since December 2011 and bel

Re: [VOTE] recommend Apache DeltaSpike for graduating out of the incubator

2013-03-30 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1 (binding) Cheers Christian On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > The Apache DeltaSpike podling is a project which contains common CDI > Extensions which are portable among many different Java EE containers and > even run on standalone CDI containers. > > We are no

Re: [VOTE] recommend Apache DeltaSpike for graduating out of the incubator

2013-03-30 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
+1 (binding) from me. Good luck! Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http:

Re: [VOTE] recommend Apache DeltaSpike for graduating out of the incubator

2013-03-30 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 regards, gerhard 2013/3/30 Mark Struberg > Hi! > > The Apache DeltaSpike podling is a project which contains common CDI > Extensions which are portable among many different Java EE containers and > even run on standalone CDI containers. > > We are now incubating since December 2011 and bel

Re: [VOTE] recommend Apache DeltaSpike for graduating out of the incubator

2013-03-30 Thread Mark Struberg
here is my +1 (binding) LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Mark Struberg > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 5:54 PM > Subject: [VOTE] recommend Apache DeltaSpike for graduating out of the > incubator > > Hi! > > The Apache Delt

[VOTE] recommend Apache DeltaSpike for graduating out of the incubator

2013-03-30 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! The Apache DeltaSpike podling is a project which contains common CDI Extensions which are portable among many different Java EE containers and even run on standalone CDI containers.  We are now incubating since December 2011 and believe we are ready for graduation. We've shipped 3 release

Re: Creating announce@ lists by default

2013-03-30 Thread Noah Slater
I really like this idea, Marvin. If you're gonna run with it, I'll take a step back. On 30 March 2013 15:39, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > > Thanks Greg. Sane advice. I'll add this to my todo list and see if I can > > come up with a patch for th

Re: Creating announce@ lists by default

2013-03-30 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Thanks Greg. Sane advice. I'll add this to my todo list and see if I can > come up with a patch for the docs. The obvious place to patch is the descriptive paragraph here: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-mailing-li

Re: Creating announce@ lists by default

2013-03-30 Thread Noah Slater
Thanks Greg. Sane advice. I'll add this to my todo list and see if I can come up with a patch for the docs. On 28 March 2013 06:50, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > >... > > I don't believe we should force an announce@ list on anybody. But I do > > thin

Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus

2013-03-30 Thread ant elder
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Matthias Friedrich wrote: > > As someone who is relatively new to the ASF and who's first behind the > scenes contact with Apache was the incubation process, I can tell that > this is absolutely true. Podlings find themselves in a kafkaesque > world where many rul

Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus

2013-03-30 Thread ant elder
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > As Doug points out, votes are structured away > from the status quo- we don't ever vote to > continue on with previously agreed to issues > just to circumvent the voting process. > Ok thanks Joe and Doug. So to be absolutely clear, the wor