Let's move the podling chatter to the dev list. :)
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:55 PM, "Edward J. Yoon" wrote:
> Thanks Ant.
>
> Could you please also create commits@ list for wiki/source commit
> mails? The submit button of the web form doesn't change from Disabled.
>
> On Thu, Mar 2
Thanks Ant.
Could you please also create commits@ list for wiki/source commit
mails? The submit button of the web form doesn't change from Disabled.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:59 PM, ant elder wrote:
> Please find that the MRQL mailing lists have been created and are
> ready to be used for furthe
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I am under the impression that having a low-volume, high-signal
> announcement channel is generally beneficial to most projects that try it.
I agree that such lists are useful. I like to subscribe to individual
announce lists for security pu
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013, Andrei Savu wrote:
> I think we should see this as option and let the podling decide.
>
> In some cases it's useful but most of time it's enough if you filter
> the dev / user lists for messages that contain ANNOUNCE in the subject
> line.
+1
>
> -- Andrei Savu / ax
I think we should see this as option and let the podling decide.
In some cases it's useful but most of time it's enough if you filter
the dev / user lists for messages that contain ANNOUNCE in the subject
line.
-- Andrei Savu / axemblr.com
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
Why would you want to subscribe to the announce list of every new incubator
project? If you wanted to do that, you'd just subscribe to
general@incubator.apache.org, or even annou...@apache.org.
Please note, I am not suggesting we disband annou...@apache.org. We already
have plenty of TLPs using an
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Yep. Obviously, I'm aware we have a foundation-wide announce list. :)
>
> It's not very helpful for people who are only interested in one or two
> projects, however.
>
> If I am using Hadoop, and only care about knowing about new Hadoop releas
Yep. Obviously, I'm aware we have a foundation-wide announce list. :)
It's not very helpful for people who are only interested in one or two
projects, however.
If I am using Hadoop, and only care about knowing about new Hadoop releases
or security disclosures, I do not want to:
a) subscribe to a
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> ...We already have a Apache wide announce list, which is used for release
> announcements and probably can or is already used for the other things
> you mentioned
Yes, see http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-a
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Luciano, release announcements and security disclosures.
>
> Jordan, can you clarify what you understand by "be maintained"? Just to be
> clear, this is a one time operation, and as far as I know, comes with no
> maintenance costs whatsoever.
Luciano, release announcements and security disclosures.
Jordan, can you clarify what you understand by "be maintained"? Just to be
clear, this is a one time operation, and as far as I know, comes with no
maintenance costs whatsoever. So the "too much" part of "too much for
little gain" doesn't ap
There are already 3 public and 1 private lists that have to be maintained.
Another list just for announcements seems like too much for little gain. The
users list should suffice for announcements (with [ANN] in the subject).
-JZ
On Mar 26, 2013, at 4:05 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Incubator,
>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Incubator,
>
> Is there a reason we don't recommend podlings create an announce@ list by
> default?
>
> I am under the impression that having a low-volume, high-signal
> announcement channel is generally beneficial to most projects that try it.
Adding RESULT to the subject.
> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:42:37 +0530
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Falcon into the Apache Incubator (was originally
> named Ivory)
> From: srikanth.sundarra...@inmobi.com
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> Hi,
> This vote has PASSED with 8 binding +1s and 5 n
Hi,
This vote has PASSED with 8 binding +1s and 5 non-binding +1s.
Binding +1 VOTES:
===
Arun Murthy
Chris Douglas
Alan Gates
Niall Pemberton
Devaraj Das
Leif Hedstrom
Owen O Malley
Alan Cabrera
Non-binding +1 VOTES
==
Sharad Agarwal
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Shwetha GS
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on Falcon
> (formerly Ivory). I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Apache
> Falcon into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till (Tue 3/26 6pm IST).
>
Incubator,
Is there a reason we don't recommend podlings create an announce@ list by
default?
I am under the impression that having a low-volume, high-signal
announcement channel is generally beneficial to most projects that try it.
And comes with almost zero Infra overhead.
I had a chat about t
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote:
>
>> [ ] +1 Accept Apache Falcon into the Incubator
>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>> [ ] -1 Don't accept Apache Falcon into the Incubator because...
>>
>
>
> +1. Binding.
>
>
Hi all,
Apache Onami entered incubation before more than 3 months. Since then
the community has proven to be pretty active and healthy.
A few releases were made and the status page has been completed:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/onami.html
Three new committers were added in the past wee
19 matches
Mail list logo
