Re: Incubator voting status page

On 1 February 2013 19:48, sebb wrote: > On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote: >>> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote: On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> Branko Čibej wrote on T

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote: >> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote: On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100: >> I g

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 1 February 2013 17:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100: >> I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it >> doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server. > > The only supported way to get content to

Re: Please help us release 2 Onami artifacts

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Mohammad! > >> >> I don't think so, I think it is just bad timing as I notice that traffic on >> different mailing list is low these days, maybe some people still have >> holidays/vacations, busy at work after a holiday/vacation >> >> But

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100: > I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it > doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server. The only supported way to get content to the web servers is to commit it to svn and have svnpub

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote: > On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100: > I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting t

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 31.01.2013 11:02, sebb wrote: > On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej wrote: >> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for >> preview at >> >> http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html >> >> By "embedded" I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Inc

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100: I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or probably file an INFR

Re: svn commit: r1441429 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/bloodhound.xml

Thanks for the reminder. On 01.02.2013 16:42, sebb wrote: > Please remember to publish the site after committing updates. > > > > On 1 February 2013 12:49, wrote: >> Author: brane >> Date: Fri Feb 1 12:49:29 2013 >> New Revision: 1441429 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441429&view=

Re: Please help us release 2 Onami artifacts

Hi Mohammad! > > I don't think so, I think it is just bad timing as I notice that traffic on > different mailing list is low these days, maybe some people still have > holidays/vacations, busy at work after a holiday/vacation > > But above all most of this problem is on my shoulder as I am mentor

Re: svn commit: r1441429 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/bloodhound.xml

Please remember to publish the site after committing updates. On 1 February 2013 12:49, wrote: > Author: brane > Date: Fri Feb 1 12:49:29 2013 > New Revision: 1441429 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441429&view=rev > Log: > Replace silly dots with   entities. > Add archive links to

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 31.01.2013 14:13, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 31.01.2013 11:02, sebb wrote: >> On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for >>> preview at >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html >>> >>> By "emb

Re: Please help us release 2 Onami artifacts

Hi... On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Gary Martin wrote: > On 01/02/13 04:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> we need one more binding vote for the two running votings on Onami: >> http://people.apache.org/~**brane/incubator-votes.html

Re: Please help us release 2 Onami artifacts

On 01/02/13 04:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Hello all, we need one more binding vote for the two running votings on Onami: http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html They are 9 days open so far... hopefully somebody else from the IPMC can flesh out a few minutes and check them. Tha

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100: >>> I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or >>> probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to >>>

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.0 Release Candidate RC0.

Closing the vote since its past 72 hours. The vote passes with 4 IPMC +1's. Mahadev Konar Devaraj Das Arun Murthy Tommaso Teofili Will do the needful to push the release out. thanks for voting mahadev On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > ok thanks, it worked now, therefor

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.0 Release Candidate RC0.

Sure Brane. Doing it right now :). On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 01.02.2013 08:56, Mahadev Konar wrote: >> Closing the vote since its past 72 hours. >> >> The vote passes with 4 IPMC +1's. Will do the needful to push the release >> out. > > The first needful is to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.0 Release Candidate RC0.

On 01.02.2013 08:56, Mahadev Konar wrote: > Closing the vote since its past 72 hours. > > The vote passes with 4 IPMC +1's. Will do the needful to push the release out. The first needful is to send a proper [RESOLVED][VOTE] mail :) -- Brane, quite touchy on the subject after writing the votes par