- Donation uploaded to people.a.o [1]
- ICLA from the author (Frank Zhang) has been received by the ASF Secretary.
- IP Clearance form has been submitted to the incubator site. [2]
- The CloudStack vote to accept the contribution passed [3]
One thing to note on this particular submission is that t
Citrix has offered donation of egress firewall manipulation for guest
networks to Apache CloudStack.
- The code was uploaded to ReviewBoard by the author (Jayapal Reddy) [1]
- The ASF secretary has received an ICLA from Jayapal.
- The IP clearance form has been submitted to the incubator site[2]
-
Citrix has documentation it wishes to donate to Apache CloudStack
- The ASF Secretary has recorded an ICLA from the author (Jessica Tomechak).
- The source code for this documentation was uploaded to people.a.o [1]
- The IP Clearance form has been added to the incubator site [2]
- The CloudStack v
On 26.01.2013 00:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100:
>> On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100:
> On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
> >> I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
> >> list archives, not just general@, for vote threads
Hey Benson,
I agree with Joe - not sure that your job as Incubator VP is to drop any
hammers.
The org is fine -- the ticket is opened as you said and no bits (binary or
source) have been shipped anywhere yet. Still discussing and talking. My
fear though is that the discussing and talking are endl
I wanted to give a heads up to the list: You are going to see 7 IP
clearance vote threads started here in the next couple of days, coming
from the CloudStack project.
The tl;dr version of *why* is that members of the community were still
learning about what it means to develop within the project v
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.6.0-incubating. This is the third release candidate of our first
release at Apache.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that makes it easy
to build partitioned and replicated, fault tolerant a
That's not your role as chair to be personally
concerned about a project release- that's the
group's responsibility. You should confine
your concerns to our efficacy and ability to
carry out the role of an IPMC member properly.
IOW relax, the outcome isn't going to sink the
org one way or anothe
Chris et al,
I'm suffering from a mild crisis of responsibility here. I'm the VP of
the incubator. cTakes is planning to ship a release containing
something that, according to some lights, is inadmissible. If that
'something' is in *the (source) release*, I have serious qualms. If
it's merely in a
Hi Guys,
On 1/25/13 10:29 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
[...snip...]
>>>
>> Sorry, that's really what I meant: to think about that file as to
>>whether it
>> can do any harm and how to determine its safety. I haven't looked at
>>the
>> file, but it sounds like you know it can do harm.
>
>Depend
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/25/13 10:20 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/25/13 8:28 AM, "Chen, Pei" wrote:
>>>
I am actually glad that it is discussed here so that other podlings
On 1/25/13 10:20 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/25/13 8:28 AM, "Chen, Pei" wrote:
>>
>>> I am actually glad that it is discussed here so that other podlings or
>>> future
>>> podlings are aware of these fundamental ite
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/25/13 8:28 AM, "Chen, Pei" wrote:
>
>> I am actually glad that it is discussed here so that other podlings or future
>> podlings are aware of these fundamental items (since not everyone may
>> subscribe to legal-discuss).
>>
>> Is t
On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
>> I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
>> list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
> Do you also parse the d...@helix.incubator.apache.o
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
> I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
> list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
Do you also parse the d...@helix.incubator.apache.org archives, which are in
~apmail/public-arch/h
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 22:01:32 +0100:
> On 24.01.2013 17:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
> >> On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
> >>> Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
> >>> looks
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that icons, gifs, jpgs are ok in both source and binary
> dists. My mental model for source dists is whether the file can do any harm
> and what the developer would do to verify its safety. For icons, gifs,
> jpgs, I would load
On 1/25/13 8:28 AM, "Chen, Pei" wrote:
> I am actually glad that it is discussed here so that other podlings or future
> podlings are aware of these fundamental items (since not everyone may
> subscribe to legal-discuss).
>
> Is this philosophy or policy also true for parts of a code base tha
I am actually glad that it is discussed here so that other podlings or future
podlings are aware of these fundamental items (since not everyone may subscribe
to legal-discuss).
Is this philosophy or policy also true for parts of a code base that are
intricate to the basic functionality of the s
On 25.01.2013 16:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
>> contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
> I'll bet that Ryan isn't subscribed to general@incuba
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
> contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
I'll bet that Ryan isn't subscribed to general@incubator and that his message
wasn't moderated through
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> wrote:
>> Hi Benson,
>>
>> On 1/24/13 7:23 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>>
>>> It's unfortunate to have this conversation in parallel here and on
>>> https://issues.apache.org/ji
I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
general@. This solved t
People act when they have a personal motivation to do so. There's no
boss telling people to do things around here.
Therefore, there's no sense in which we have two few people, we just
have too few people interested in engaging with specific projects.
Interest can be both practical (the project is
On 24 January 2013 18:52, Benson Margulies wrote:
> If you model the IPMC as a group of volunteers who have collectively
> volunteered to mentor and supervise new projects, then the current
> situation strongly suggests that we have either too many projects or
> not enough volunteers. Calling peo
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> On 1/24/13 7:23 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>
>>It's unfortunate to have this conversation in parallel here and on
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-157.
>>
>>Also, this thread is a combo of the discus
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> +1 (IPMC)
>
> I checked md5/sig, looked for headers and such in the source code. All
> looks good to me.
> I saw Bloodhound uses RAT. I found it very helpful when a RAT report
> is provided together with the vote. Its optional, but very
Hi,
The voting has now concluded.
The following votes were cast:
Branko Čibej +1 (Mentor)
Greg Stein +1 (Mentor)
Christian Grobmeier +1 (Binding)
The vote therefore passed with 3 binding votes.
Regards,
- Ryan
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> +1 (IPM
just to confirm my binding vote (already expressed on clerezza-dev@):
+1
Tommaso
p.s.
we just need one more vote, please anyone?
2013/1/22 Tommaso Teofili
>
>
>
> 2013/1/22 Bertrand Delacretaz
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Tommaso Teofili
>> wrote:
>> > ...should i cance
Hi Benson,
On 1/24/13 7:23 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>It's unfortunate to have this conversation in parallel here and on
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-157.
>
>Also, this thread is a combo of the discussion of ordinary
>jars-of-classes (where I'd forgotten the policy) and the m
31 matches
Mail list logo
