+1 this sounds great to me, too.
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/24/13 3:08 PM, "Chris Douglas" wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Masanz, James J.
>wrote:
>> One goal is to have a binary that contains all resources, which can be
>>used to install cTAKES on a system that does not have an internet
>>c
Great job, Brane!
On 1/24/13 3:50 AM, "Joachim Dreimann"
wrote:
>Good work Brane. Just one feature suggestion: Could you display the
>relative time (ie '3 days ago') in the table, and the absolute time in
>tooltips?
>That would make it much easier to read I reckon.
>
>Cheers,
>Joe
>
>
>On 24 Jan
It's unfortunate to have this conversation in parallel here and on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-157.
Also, this thread is a combo of the discussion of ordinary
jars-of-classes (where I'd forgotten the policy) and the much more
tangled question of models, which is what the JIRA is wr
On 25.01.2013 01:50, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> ...>>
I am referring to this discussion http://s.apache.org/MUZ
>>> Well, that clear enough, even if it is a typical example of how our
>>> foun
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
> ...>>
> >> I am referring to this discussion http://s.apache.org/MUZ
> > Well, that clear enough, even if it is a typical example of how our
> > founders yell at us but we have no mechanism to c
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Masanz, James J. wrote:
> One goal is to have a binary that contains all resources, which can be used
> to install cTAKES on a system that does not have an internet connection.
> For now we can focus on a first Apache release that doesn't meet that goal,
> while
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Franklin
> wrote:
>> On Monday, January 21, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> Matt, can you reference the policy that category A deps can't be
>>> sitting in svn in binary? Of course, these folks can learn to
On 24.01.2013 22:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I've noticed before that our archives seem to be incomplete, and
> indeed it appears that the mbox files contain only messages To: a
> list, everything that actually gets delivered to subscribers by the
> list server.
I meant to say, /not/ everything that
On 24.01.2013 17:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
>> On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
>>> Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
>>> looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
>>>
Hi !
On 1/24/13, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
[...]
>
> So, in my entirely personal opinion, this leaves two directions: more
> volunteers or less projects. In the extreme, some would read this as a
> reason to close the gates to new projects until we have proven
> capacity.
>
Is there any chance t
If you model the IPMC as a group of volunteers who have collectively
volunteered to mentor and supervise new projects, then the current
situation strongly suggests that we have either too many projects or
not enough volunteers. Calling people 'lazy' has rarely been observed
to get them to do more w
On 24/01/13 16:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take cc
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
> On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
> > Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
> > looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
> > doesn't take cc's as being on the list or som
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
> We all seem to want a bit of feature creep. I would probably include a
> last update time for the page.
Guys, you're committers, the code is in Subversion, go wild :)
> Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
> looks like the
We all seem to want a bit of feature creep. I would probably include a
last update time for the page.
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take cc's as being on the list or something
Good work Brane. Just one feature suggestion: Could you display the
relative time (ie '3 days ago') in the table, and the absolute time in
tooltips?
That would make it much easier to read I reckon.
Cheers,
Joe
On 24 January 2013 04:05, Branko Čibej wrote:
> A while ago I proposed we should hav
Il 24/01/2013 11:54, Bertrand Delacretaz ha scritto:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
...While I may disagree with the concept, I have no real opposition to people
attempting to spin up projects here
Me neither, I'm not opposing, just suggesting a way that might be more
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> ...While I may disagree with the concept, I have no real opposition to people
> attempting to spin up projects here
Me neither, I'm not opposing, just suggesting a way that might be more
efficient.
-Bertrand
-
On Jan 24, 2013 5:41 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Federico Strati
wrote:
> > ...Maybe you may suggest me the appropriate forum as well
>
> As you don't seem to have code or a community yet, and there was
> apparently no interest in your origina
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Federico Strati wrote:
> ...Maybe you may suggest me the appropriate forum as well
As you don't seem to have code or a community yet, and there was
apparently no interest in your original proposal, it's probably better
to start working on your project els
Hello Greg,
thanks for the reply. I just answer shortly to a couple of points you
raised.
IMO, RDBMS independence is a useless goal.
Software deployments never wake up on a Thursday, and say, "let's change
our database."
Always, the goal is to store information, and to make the best use of th
On Jan 24, 2013 2:53 AM, "Federico Strati" wrote:
>...
> The proposed idea is in its very early stage of conception, so any
discussion,
> even if completely against it (but with good reasons), will be appreciated
> as well as any pointer to related on going efforts in any project.
IMO, RDBMS inde
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>...the current results are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
>
> That page (should) get updated every 4 hours...
Cool - it might make sense to integrate with https://whimsy.apache.org/
-Bertrand
-
On 24.01.2013 06:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:05:42 +0100:
>> There are currently no links to the actual vote threads. Also I'm having
>> a bit of trouble with the feed from mod_mbox, as it's quite short-term
>> and doesn't seem to be at all complete; tha
24 matches
Mail list logo
