Hello,
I had no answer to the first post of this proposal, but I sent
it during xmas holidays.
So I send it again, I really would like to discuss the ideas
proposed.
Maybe you may suggest me the appropriate forum as well.
Cheers
Federico
-- Short Description --
RDBMSSR: RDBMS Softwa
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:05:42 +0100:
> There are currently no links to the actual vote threads. Also I'm having
> a bit of trouble with the feed from mod_mbox, as it's quite short-term
> and doesn't seem to be at all complete; that's why I switched to using
> the current month
+1 (IPMC)
I checked md5/sig, looked for headers and such in the source code. All
looks good to me.
I saw Bloodhound uses RAT. I found it very helpful when a RAT report
is provided together with the vote. Its optional, but very nice imho.
Also I think the capitalization of jQuery in the NOTICE fil
Thats cool. I have something like that in mind before a couple of
days. Now its here. Its like Christmas. Thank you.
Our tool "Marvin" sens out mails for reports already; maybe it can be
used for reminders to vote too. If you find the code of Marvin, pls
let me know. I wanted to change the recipien
A while ago I proposed we should have a status page showing current
pending votes.
To this end I've begun writing a simple script that parses the
general@incubator Atom feed from Markmail and creates a static web page
with information gleaned from there (it keeps longer-term data in a
SQLite datab
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Well, that clear enough, even if it is a typical example of how our
> founders yell at us but we have no mechanism to channel those yells
> into concise, unambiguous, documentation.
+1, I've felt that as well.
FWIW, I think the material
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Looking at this:
>
>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>
> ...it makes me headache.
I made a bit of headway revising releasemanagement.html a few months back, but
got stuck eventually.
Ideally, that page wo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13561341#comment-13561341
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on INCUBATOR-125:
---
The page has now been published:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:39 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 January 2013 23:42, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:52 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> Best practise is to include the component version info, e.g. SuperWidget
>>> 1.234.
>>> It's not unknown for licenses to change.
>>
>> I don't re
For argument's sake, let's say "two". That is the specified/recommended
minimum. Thus, the IPMC must contribute an additional +1. Thus, it can
totally block podling releases thru its laziness and inactivity.
Sounds broken.
-g
On Jan 23, 2013 5:22 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
> How many active mento
On 23.01.2013 18:42, Gary Martin wrote:
> Regarding the original suggestion, a web based tool would only seem to
> be useful if the problem is associated with IPMC members not noticing
> rather than not feeling that they have time to do proper reviews.
That's a fair point. Still, I've decided to h
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I recommend that you start by politely asking your mentors.
>
> If you, or one of these other projects, don't have enough active
> mentors to pass a release vote, I recommend that you recruit more
> mentors. One possibility is that one the
Gary,
I recommend that you start by politely asking your mentors.
If you, or one of these other projects, don't have enough active
mentors to pass a release vote, I recommend that you recruit more
mentors. One possibility is that one the participants could join the
IPMC; we have voted in people w
On 18/01/13 11:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
...Can we somehow find a way to highlight currently running votes?...
Isn't the [VOTE] tag in subject sufficien
On 01/23/2013 05:20 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
As for the binaries, I am personally uncomfortable if you cannot even
create a private download of those sources accessible to community
members. However, I don't know how to translate my personal discomfort
into policy. I will endeavour to get some
So, nothing derived from those undisclosable sources can be in the
source package: period.
As for the binaries, I am personally uncomfortable if you cannot even
create a private download of those sources accessible to community
members. However, I don't know how to translate my personal discomfort
One goal is to have a binary that contains all resources, which can be used to
install cTAKES on a system that does not have an internet connection.
For now we can focus on a first Apache release that doesn't meet that goal,
while pursuing the question with legal.
If legal says we can't do have t
Good morning IPMC,
The Apache Onami community has voted[1] the release of Apache
Onami-Test 1.4.0-incubating, collecting two IPMC votes from members
Olivier Lamy and Christian Grobmeier.
This is the changelist:
Bug
[ONAMI-25] - Rename the JUniceRunner as OnamiRunner
[ONAMI-28] - Do not use code
Good morning IPMC,
The Apache Onami community has voted[1] the release of Apache
Onami-Logging 3.4.0-incubating, collecting two IPMC votes from members
Olivier Lamy and Christian Grobmeier.
This is the changelist:
Bug
[ONAMI-28] - Do not use code from com.google.inject.internal
Dependency upgra
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> No, the OpenNLP did not have any discussion about it with legal. We just
> came to the conclusion
> that its not worth spending time on these issues, when we can instead
> produce our own training
> data which is compatible with the Apache l
On 01/23/2013 09:24 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Masanz, James J. wrote:
>Another question about the convenience binary -- can it include the models for
which the training data cannot be shared with the community?
My guess would be no, but it sounds like the OpenN
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Masanz, James J. wrote:
> Another question about the convenience binary -- can it include the models
> for which the training data cannot be shared with the community?
My guess would be no, but it sounds like the OpenNLP community studied
this in detail; have you
22 matches
Mail list logo
