You mean http://www.producingoss.com/en/growth.html#using-archives ?
(the first paragraphs apply just a well to documentation as to mail archives)
Benson Margulies wrote on Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 13:54:07 -0500:
> I'd like to float the following idea:
>
> Any time anyone offers a critique of a podl
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Masanz, James J. wrote:
>
> Many of the models are derived from data that is not publicly released. But
> those *models* have been contributed to Apache cTAKES.
>
> This is the primary mechanism for distribution of these models.
This discussion has come up before
+1 to citing documentation as much as possible. It would be great if s wiki
page could be maintained keeping such references in one place. Eventually
this could be written up on the community.a.o site.
On 21 January 2013 18:54, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'd like to float the following idea:
>
>
Many of the models are derived from data that is not publicly released. But
those *models* have been contributed to Apache cTAKES.
This is the primary mechanism for distribution of these models.
I said "many" above because at least one of the models is derived from
Wikipedia data (which was di
Infra asks for a "heads up" for large artifacts:
http://s.apache.org/5vz While these aren't over the limit, it might be
worth pinging them. To be clear, these models were trained on external
data, so they can't be regenerated? Are they packaged here for
convenience, or is this the primary mechanism
The models are in jars because the machine learning library that produces them
creates a jar per model. I'm not sure offhand if it is required to be that way.
But the contents of the jars are not something a person would modify directly.
You might build a new model but that would replace the jar
Hi Guys,
On 1/21/13 11:48 AM, "Matt Franklin" wrote:
>On Monday, January 21, 2013, Masanz, James J. wrote:
>
>>
>> Sorry, I didn't mean for you to have to look through the email archives,
>>
>> tinyurl.com/cTAKES-3-0-0-RC4-RESULT
>> Here is a direct link to the VOTE RESULT for RC4.
>
>
>Thanks,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Franklin wrote:
> On Monday, January 21, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> Matt, can you reference the policy that category A deps can't be
>> sitting in svn in binary? Of course, these folks can learn to use ivy,
>> maven, or maven-ant-tasks to reduce the ne
On Monday, January 21, 2013, Masanz, James J. wrote:
>
> Sorry, I didn't mean for you to have to look through the email archives,
>
> tinyurl.com/cTAKES-3-0-0-RC4-RESULT
> Here is a direct link to the VOTE RESULT for RC4.
Thanks, though I saw this result. I was looking for the RC5 email
> Pe
Sorry, I didn't mean for you to have to look through the email archives,
tinyurl.com/cTAKES-3-0-0-RC4-RESULT
Here is a direct link to the VOTE RESULT for RC4.
Pei called the VOTE for RC5 simultaneously to general@ and ctakes-dev
Regards,
James Masanz
> -Original Message-
> From: g
Yes, I like this approach and already try to do that.
I also would like to suggest that we try to update the docs to be a
good reference.
Looking at this:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
...it makes me headache.
I found it always very difficult to discuss changes to such
On Monday, January 21, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Matt, can you reference the policy that category A deps can't be
> sitting in svn in binary? Of course, these folks can learn to use ivy,
> maven, or maven-ant-tasks to reduce the need for this, but I'd like to
> be clear on whether this is re
Matt, can you reference the policy that category A deps can't be
sitting in svn in binary? Of course, these folks can learn to use ivy,
maven, or maven-ant-tasks to reduce the need for this, but I'd like to
be clear on whether this is required behavior or not. I thought that a
source package could
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Masanz, James J.
wrote:
>
> Regarding the comment about compiled jars in the source tree:
>
> The following jars, even though they are under src directories, contain
> resources (models), not Java classes.
>
> conll-2009-dev-shift-pop.jar
> dummy.dep.mod.jar
> ma
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Masanz, James J.
wrote:
> The result of the VOTE for 3.0.0-incubating on the dev list is at
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ctakes-dev/201301.mbox/browser
I looked through the archives and didn't see a RESULT e-mail that
summarizes the PPMC v
Regarding the comment about compiled jars in the source tree:
The following jars, even though they are under src directories, contain
resources (models), not Java classes.
conll-2009-dev-shift-pop.jar
dummy.dep.mod.jar
mayo-dep.jar
wordnet-3.0-lemma-data.jar
dummy.srl.mod.jar
en_srl_ontonotes.j
The result of the VOTE for 3.0.0-incubating on the dev list is at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ctakes-dev/201301.mbox/browser
The source artifact can be found in
http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/
I'll look at the jars and the root NOTICE
I have some issues with this release as it currently stands:
* Where is the result of the VOTE thread on the dev list?
* Where is the source artifact? The artifact linked in the vote
thread appears to be your convenience binary release.
* There are compiled jars in the source tree. These need to
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
wrote:
> We know that "Apache Project Branding Requirements" [1] applies to
> top-level projects. Does the podling have to follow the same ?...
Yes of course - if only so that the branding is ok once the podling graduates.
>
> ...T
Hi,
It seems that we need just one more IPMC vote in order to release Apache
Bloodhound 0.4 (incubating). Sebb has not yet indicated whether he is
happy with Brane's response but would anyone else like to look and
perhaps give us a final vote?
Cheers,
Gary
On 18/01/13 11:03, Branko Čibe
Just for your information, we've proceeded to ask trademarks@ for such
details. Thanks.
On 18/01/13 09:18, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote:
We know that "Apache Project Branding Requirements" [1] applies to
top-level projects. Does the podling have to follow the same ?
The contributors follow
Thanks Suresh for your tip, should i cancel and re open the vote with the
updated paragraph?
Tommaso
2013/1/18 Suresh Marru
> Hi Tommaso,
>
> As per the template [1], the first paragraph of the resolution should have
> ${DESCRIPTION-AND-SCOPE} you currently only have the project name which is
22 matches
Mail list logo
