I will take a look before Monday at the latest.
On Friday, January 18, 2013, Coarr, Matt wrote:
> Hi, we just need one more Incubator PMC vote for cTAKES version 3.0.
>
> Matt
>
>
> ---
> From: , Pei >
> Subject: Collecting IPMC votes
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing the followi
Hi, we just need one more Incubator PMC vote for cTAKES version 3.0.
Matt
---
From: , Pei
Subject: Collecting IPMC votes
Hi,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
This will be our first release.
A vote is also held on the develope
Hi Tommaso,
As per the template [1], the first paragraph of the resolution should have
${DESCRIPTION-AND-SCOPE} you currently only have the project name which is not
introduced until the second paragraph.
May be you want to consider changing:
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to
Lazy consensus reached - continuing the release.
Jason
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Jason Letourneau
wrote:
> Apache Streams is looking to release its 0.1 Master POM. Given this
> is our first release, I'd like to call attention to a mistake I've
> made by inadvertently promoting the staged
+1
2013/1/18 Bertrand Delacretaz :
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> wrote:
>>...I'm opening the vote
>> for the below Apache Clerezza TLP graduation resolution...
>
> +1
>
> -Bertrand (Clerezza mentor)
>
> -
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
>...I'm opening the vote
> for the below Apache Clerezza TLP graduation resolution...
+1
-Bertrand (Clerezza mentor)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubat
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> ...Can we somehow find a way to highlight currently running votes?...
>
> Isn't the [VOTE] tag in subject sufficient?
> You could filter those threads t
Hi all,
as per [VOTE][RESULT] on clerezza-dev@i.a.o mailing list [1] and after
having successfully completed podling name search [2] I'm opening the vote
for the below Apache Clerezza TLP graduation resolution.
X. Establish the Apache Clerezza Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems
On 18.01.2013 11:39, sebb wrote:
> On 17 January 2013 22:47, Ryan Ollos wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4
>> (incubating)
>> in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC.
>>
>> The vote PPMC vote thread:
>>
On 17 January 2013 22:47, Ryan Ollos wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4
> (incubating)
> in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC.
>
> The vote PPMC vote thread:
> http://markmail.org/message/d2yvz2tx5pj5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili resolved PODLINGNAMESEARCH-20.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Establish whether "Apache Clerezza" i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13557105#comment-13557105
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-20:
--
Loo
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> ...Can we somehow find a way to highlight currently running votes?...
Isn't the [VOTE] tag in subject sufficient?
You could filter those threads to a different mail folder to make sure
you don't miss them.
-Bertrand
--
Tommaso Teofili created PODLINGNAMESEARCH-20:
Summary: Establish whether "Apache Clerezza" is a suitable name
Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-20
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-20
We know that "Apache Project Branding Requirements" [1] applies to
top-level projects. Does the podling have to follow the same ?
The contributors followed "Podling name search guide" while they were
making the proposal. Can a podling do the official name search [2] which
they can use to become TL
Hi all,
more than 72h have passed and the current thread can be considered
concluded and passes with the following resolution:
three binding votes from IPMC members:
* Christian Grobmeier *
* Olivier Lamy *
* Tommaso Teofili
* voted on dev@onami http://markmail.org/message/ymkkfwlf2qg6tg65
Hi everyone,
I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4
(incubating)
in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC.
The vote PPMC vote thread:
http://markmail.org/message/d2yvz2tx5pj57ru4
Please find the change log for this proposed release
On 17.01.2013 23:47, Ryan Ollos wrote:
> ...
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.4
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
+1 (binding)
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
--
18 matches
Mail list logo
