On Dec 27, 2012, at 21:09 , Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Marcel Offermans
> wrote:
>> Hello Roman,
>>
>> Thanks for helping out with reviewing the Celix release over the last couple
>> of weeks.
>> After Luciano stepped down as a mentor some time ago, we are still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Dec 2012, at 02:02, David Crossley wrote:
> Mark Struberg wrote:
>> hi lords and ladies!
>>
>> I looked at a few of my old incubation projects I helped to grow and most of
>> them still don't have their incubator status page [1] marked as 'gra
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Marcel Offermans
wrote:
> Hello Roman,
>
> Thanks for helping out with reviewing the Celix release over the last couple
> of weeks.
> After Luciano stepped down as a mentor some time ago, we are still one mentor
> short.
> Would you consider becoming one, so we h
Thanks! I managed to find right after I posted the message the link to
the incubator CMS to re-gen the page.
On Dec 27, 2012, at 1:54 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi Shazron,
>
> it looks pretty good now? Can't see a difference.
>
> That said, one needs to publish the new content via the CMS
Hello Simone,
In general I'm always sceptical when people point at old releases and say "this
must be okay because X did it like this as well". However, in this case I agree
that there are many packagers that put in an extra folder in their source
archive and put those files there.
So:
+1 for
On 27.12.2012 08:41, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Hi Marcel,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Marcel Offermans
>> wrote:
>>> -1 Because: The release now is a ZIP file, and contains the NOTICE and
>>> LICENSE f
Salut Marcel/all,
> So either all of these packages are "wrong" or it seems it is
> acceptable usage. Actually I think it is fine: it is the only folder
> which becomes extracted for me everything inside this folder is
> "root".
+1, and I'd invite you reconsidering to change the -1 vote to a +1:
Hi Shazron,
it looks pretty good now? Can't see a difference.
That said, one needs to publish the new content via the CMS.
Please look at this:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
(generating the top level website)
As mentioned, I have looked if there are differences but could not
fi
Hi again,
thanks for your efforts! I appreciate it.
I now what you mean now, but I think its pretty normal. Please look at
what I did with Commons Compress:
$ java -classpath commons-compress-1.4.1.jar
org.apache.commons.compress.archivers.Lister
org.apache.felix.configadmin-1.6.0-source-release
