Dear Incubation members,
During incubation, OpenMeetings has :
* Produced 1 Release
* Added 5 new Committer/PPMC members and shows constant community
activities
* Cleared IP on all code
* Developed Roadmap(s) for the next major and minor releases in a
community process and started working on t
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> First of several reminders:
>
> For podlings reporting in December, we'd like *all* mentors to sign
> off on the reports. I hope to use this to get a clearer picture of
> where we have mentor weaknesses.
>
> General note: if you are a PPMC
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 December 2012 6:41 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.3 (incubating)
>
> On 01.12.2012 08:37, Luciano Resende wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:
Benson Margulies wrote:
> Can you point to some maintenance instructions for all of this?
Sorry i do not have time to find them right now,
but it has been explained to this list on various
occasions so should be in the archives. We do need to
have better docs, so that we do not all forget, me incl
Well aware, thank you.
On Dec 1, 2012 12:39 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
> Hyrum and Greg,
>
> The bloodhound project is trying to make a release. You gents are
> listed as mentors. Could you please find the time to check out and
> vote appropriately on their release?
>
> --benson
>
On 01.12.2012 16:00, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Make every vote a bugzilla issue, and use the existing script that mails
> an issue summary once a week?
That's certainly one thing I considered.
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge
2012/12/1 Christian Grobmeier :
> I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders.
>
> But they are listed here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month.html#onami
Helix too.
>
> What do I need to fix to get these reminders?
> I just know the old "wiki"-styled process
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012
Sorry, I have seen this file for the first time. I am not aware of how
it is cared.
I just ask myself one thing: why isn't this podling schedule generated
out of podling.xml? Hopefully some others can help
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Can you point to some maintenanc
Hyrum and Greg,
The bloodhound project is trying to make a release. You gents are
listed as mentors. Could you please find the time to check out and
vote appropriately on their release?
--benson
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
Can you point to some maintenance instructions for all of this?
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hmm maybe it is this file?
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/report_due_3.txt
>
> Onami which is listed there does have a wrong dev@ address.
Hmm maybe it is this file?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/report_due_3.txt
Onami which is listed there does have a wrong dev@ address.
Not sure why Marvin didn't report it
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'm embarassed to admit that I don
I'm embarassed to admit that I don't know either.
http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt looks right, what else
needs to be done?
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders.
>
> But they are listed here:
> http://incubator.apache
I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders.
But they are listed here:
http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month.html#onami
What do I need to fix to get these reminders?
I just know the old "wiki"-styled process
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Marvin wrote:
>
>
> The next board meeting is s
First of several reminders:
For podlings reporting in December, we'd like *all* mentors to sign
off on the reports. I hope to use this to get a clearer picture of
where we have mentor weaknesses.
General note: if you are a PPMC member or mentor, and you feel that
your community is undersupplied w
I'm trying to figure out how my predecessors set up the templates on
the pages; for now there's an empty page there for people to fill in.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
Anyone able to help the NSF out at a meeting in DC in Jan?
See below for more info.
On a personal note I've noticed an increased, and genuine, interest in how
to improve the impact of publicly funded research outputs from the NSF in
the last couple of years. We are even seeing important component
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I know; but it got everyone's attention, didn't it. :)
Lesson learned.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional com
Make every vote a bugzilla issue, and use the existing script that mails
an issue summary once a week?
Ross Gardler wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 14:55:05 +:
> That tool would be useful in more places than the incubator. Great idea.
> I'm looking forward to seeing it ;-)
>
> Sent from my tab
That tool would be useful in more places than the incubator. Great idea.
I'm looking forward to seeing it ;-)
Sent from my tablet
On Dec 1, 2012 2:51 PM, "Branko Čibej" wrote:
> On 01.12.2012 15:06, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> It's quite
On 01.12.2012 15:06, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails
>> about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release
>> tarball from a podling.
> Reviewing a release when
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails
> about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release
> tarball from a podling.
Reviewing a release when you are not directly involved as a developer is
**
Sorry, seems it was Luciano I agreed with.
Sent from my tablet
On Dec 1, 2012 8:43 AM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
> I'm with Benson here. But we do need to acknowledge the problem identified
> (again) by Branko.
>
> This is a mentoring problem not an IPMC problem. The IPMC needs to solve
> it for exi
I'm with Benson here. But we do need to acknowledge the problem identified
(again) by Branko.
This is a mentoring problem not an IPMC problem. The IPMC needs to solve it
for existing podlings, and podlings where mentors have gone quiet but we
need to express higher expectations of mentors for new
On 01.12.2012 08:37, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Joachim Dreimann <
> joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the third release of
>> Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by
24 matches
Mail list logo
