On 20 November 2012 23:22, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>> (Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
>>
>> Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
>> It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable format.
>
> And this i
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> (Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
>
> Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
> It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable format.
And this is the crux of the question -- what IS suitable format?
Perso
On 20 November 2012 21:20, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
>> for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubato
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
> for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
>
> Turns out, this is the
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> What does gpg --verify do?
>
> http://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.en.html
It verifies the GPG sig (as it should). I wasn't able to
find (well, by spending 2 minutes searching through
the man page on my Linux) an easy way to ask it
What does gpg --verify do?
http://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.en.html
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Turns out, this is the output of gpg and it seems that
> there's no way to ask gpg to verify it (unlike -c for md5sum lets
> say). Worse yet, because of t
Hi all,
> while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
> for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
There are several other projects who do use the same tools. Cloudstack even
list on the
Hi!
while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
Turns out, this is the output of gpg and it seems that
there's no way to ask gpg to verify it (u
Could agree more with Chris and Ross.
I've seen, first hand, at Hadoop the behaviour of significant portions of the
PMC not being present in one of the 3 sub-projects we have (HDFS, YARN,
MapReduce) and has led to significant issues in the community and in the PMC.
Along with folks like Chris I
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> This is good point of view.
>
> I think one may also take a user cases and product distribution
> perspectives into account. For example, when both projects naturally come
> in one binary release, this may be feasible to have them joined.
>
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> ...The idea is to have Nuvem become something like Tuscany Cloud Components,
> and the active Nuvem PPMC members, which mostly are already Tuscany PMC,
> will be joining the Tuscany PMC.
>
> Does that answer your doubts ?...
Yes, thanks!
-
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Luciano Resende
> >
> wrote:
> > ...Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> > discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to
> allow
> > graduation of Apache Nuvem
Fromt he peanut gallery of someone who has participated in a number of
sub-projects
over the years (Nutch, Tika, Solr, Hadoop, etc.): I don't think they have a big
place at the
ASF. The word "project" implies "community". Sub communities == umbrella
projects ==
pain, and suffering.
OTOH, sub-"
The voting period has now closed. The results are as follows:
IPMC Member Votes
-1: 0
0: 0
+1: 8
Non-binding Votes
-1: 0
0: 0
+1: 7
The vote is ***SUCCESSFUL***
Voting Record (* denotes an IPMC Member):
Jason Letourneau: +1
* Suresh Marru:+1
* Jukka Zitting: +1
* Ross Gardler:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> ...Where I start to get worried is when a sub-project takes on a life of
> its own and significant portions of the parent PMC are not interested
> in the sub-project...
I didn't notice this new thread, but my reply in the other one matches t
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> ...Bertrand, this is a great opportunity to clarify the board's attitude
> toward 'subprojects'. Ever since the campaign to dismantle umbrellas,
> I've been confused about what structures the board would find
> reasonable
I don't kno
This is good point of view.
I think one may also take a user cases and product distribution
perspectives into account. For example, when both projects naturally come
in one binary release, this may be feasible to have them joined.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov /
On 20 November 2012 11:18, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Luciano Resende
>> wrote:
>>> ...Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
>>> discussion between the two projects, we are seekin
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> ...Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
>> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
>> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub
Hi,
we were internally discussing that the project would benefit a lot from
having a mentor outside of the core Semantic Web community. Then he/she
could help us to address those issues of which are not fully aware when
you work so close in a topic. For instance, someone from the REST
communi
Hi,
> out of curiosity - how does this relate to or maybe even complement Eclipse
> Lyo [1]? For instance is Lyo one of the Enterprise Linked Data scenarios
> which you have been mentioning above?
>
> [1] http://www.eclipse.org/lyo/
>
Eclipse Lyo is focused on OSLC (Open Services for Lifecycle C
Hi Paolo,
You are right, the discussion on the list shows we should explain a bit more
about the general idea. We will add a paragraph to the proposal and some more
links to background material. ;-)
Am 19.11.2012 um 00:45 schrieb Paolo Castagna:
> On 19/11/12 01:01, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
Hi Daniel,
Am 19.11.2012 um 06:53 schrieb dsh:
> A few comments in regards to the proposal draft and "linked data"
> specifically:
>
> * maybe consider calling out that you are striving towards implementing the
> Linked Data Platform 1.0 W3C draft (at least that's how I understand the
> proposal
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> ...Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany
Can you clarify what this means
24 matches
Mail list logo
