Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 (binding) Ralph On Nov 14, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good > shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator. > > The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProp

Re: [VOTE] Accept Onami proposal in the Incubator

+1 (binding) Ralph On Nov 11, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > > I am submitting a proposal that has been open for discussion for some > days (with the former name of Mayhem), so now submitting for a vote > for this project to be accepted into the incubator. > > Vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)

I've confirmed this discrepancy is the same as what Alexander Broekhuis posted about, as noted in INFRA-5445. So 0.2 is all good to go!! On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the > .md5 does not match the .tar.gz. (I

Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

Hi Alexei, activation-1.1.jar et al are downloaded as part of the build. They're not included in the source because that's contrary to the Apache principles. That was noted in our July report (and tracked at [#1]). Regarding the LICENSE / doc/LICENSE.* files: initially, we kept each license in a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)

On Nov 14, 2012 2:13 PM, "Alexander Broekhuis" wrote: > > Hi, > > 2012/11/14 Greg Stein > > > Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the > > .md5 does not match the .tar.gz. (I did not examine the signature > > (.asc) to see if it matches the .tar.gz) > > > I haven't check

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Onami proposal in the Incubator

Quick followup: couldn't resist so I started creating the main issue (with subtaks) for Onami, please follow best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Onami proposal in the Incubator

Hi all, more than 72h passed and that vote can be closed and passes with the following resolution: six +1 binding votes from following IPMC members: * Christian Grobmeier * Alan Cabrera * Mohammad Nour El-Din * Roman Shaposhnik * Bertrand Delacretaz * Olivier Lamy two +1 non-binding votes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)

Hi, 2012/11/14 Greg Stein > Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the > .md5 does not match the .tar.gz. (I did not examine the signature > (.asc) to see if it matches the .tar.gz) I haven't checked the files, but they are placed in svn, and when downloading using chro

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 (binding) Ate On 11/14/2012 01:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator. The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal and also

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 (binding) Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Nov 14, 2012 6:36 PM, "Ryan Baxter" wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:16 AM, James M Snell wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler < rgard...@opendirective.com > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)

Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the .md5 does not match the .tar.gz. (I did not examine the signature (.asc) to see if it matches the .tar.gz) On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > +1 to release (IPMC, binding) > > [ apologies for the extreme delay

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)

+1 to release (IPMC, binding) [ apologies for the extreme delay :-( ] On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Joachim Dreimann wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the second release of > Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the > Bloodh

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:16 AM, James M Snell wrote: > +1 > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler >wrote: > > > +1 > > > > (Love the idea of Apache Screams, we could then have a Wookie Scream in a > > Rave) > > > > Ross > > > > > -Original Message- > > >

Re: Karma for incubator wiki

Hi, On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Andrew Hart wrote: > Could someone please grant me karma to edit the incubator wiki? I'd like to > add my name to a proposal. My wiki username is 'AndrewHart'. Done. > Incidentally, it looks like Davide Palmisano (see below) is in the same > situation. Wha

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > +1 > > (Love the idea of Apache Screams, we could then have a Wookie Scream in a > Rave) > > Ross > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] > > Sent: 14 November 2012 14:49 > > To: general >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 -Andrew On 11/14/2012 04:37 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator. The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal and also copie

Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

Great work! I've got the following questions concerning the ./LICENSE file for the source release: There is a list of jar files in the ./LICENSE file of the following form: activation-1.1.jar doc/LICENSE.cddl What is the point of including licenses for files which are ab

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 On 14 Nov 2012, at 15:24, Ross Gardler wrote: > +1 > > (Love the idea of Apache Screams, we could then have a Wookie Scream in a > Rave) > +100 > Ross > >> -Original Message- >> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 14 November 2012 14:49 >> To: general >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 Sander On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > +1 > > (Love the idea of Apache Screams, we could then have a Wookie Scream in a > Rave) > > Ross > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] > > Sent: 14 November 2012 14:49 > > To: g

RE: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 (Love the idea of Apache Screams, we could then have a Wookie Scream in a Rave) Ross > -Original Message- > From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] > Sent: 14 November 2012 14:49 > To: general > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project > > Hi, >

Karma for incubator wiki

Could someone please grant me karma to edit the incubator wiki? I'd like to add my name to a proposal. My wiki username is 'AndrewHart'. Incidentally, it looks like Davide Palmisano (see below) is in the same situation. Thanks very much for your help! Andrew. On 11/14/2012 04:41 AM, Davide

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

Hi, On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > Please vote. [x] +1 Accept Streams into the incubator Though I do think there's some life also in the alternative name, "Apache Screams", that came up in discussion during ACEU. ;-) BR, Jukka Zitting ---

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+ 1 (binding) All the best, Suresh On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:37 AM, "Franklin, Matthew B." wrote: > Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good > shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator. > > The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/in

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good > shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator. > > The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProp

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project

Thanks Matthew, but the page is an immutable one. how can I do? cheers, Davide On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>-Original Message- >>From: Davide Palmisano [mailto:dpalmis...@gmail.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:17 PM >>To: general@incubator.

[VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator. The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal and also copied as text below. Please vote. [ ] +1 Accept Streams into the incu

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project

>-Original Message- >From: Davide Palmisano [mailto:dpalmis...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:17 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project > >Hi there, > >I'm working to something[1] (not yet fully open source released) which >could

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project

>-Original Message- >From: Jason Letourneau [mailto:jletournea...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:19 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project > >Hi Andrew - > >Sounds great - we'd love to have you onboard. Just add your name to the

Re: November reports

Ignore my message, my eyeballs were clearly not awake the first time I read their report. It was fine. On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > OK, their report was misleading. I'll improve it slightly :-) > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: >> Hi, >> >

Re: November reports

Hi, On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> Wookie is graduated? Shouldn't they be reporting as a TLP, even if >> they haven't moved all their stuff yet? > > Their graduation vote passed, but until the board establish

Re: November reports

OK, their report was misleading. I'll improve it slightly :-) On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> Wookie is graduated? Shouldn't they be reporting as a TLP, even if >> they haven't moved all their stuff ye

Re: November reports

Droids seems to be a really easy shepherding assignment. They are on the watch list for low activity, they are self-aware of this, and they are having a conversation with the commons TLP about perhaps becoming a component there. I don't know if there is any contribution any of the rest of us could

Re: November reports

Wookie is graduated? Shouldn't they be reporting as a TLP, even if they haven't moved all their stuff yet? On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > We still have two missing reports: Helix and Syncope. Helix, since > you're only just starting, a very simple report like the

Re: November reports

On 14/11/2012 12:14, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > We still have two missing reports: Helix and Syncope. Helix, since > you're only just starting, a very simple report like the one from > Ripple is quite enough for now. Syncope, you already passed the > graduation vote, so there isn't that much to r

Re: Shepherd Assignments?

Hi, On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > I'm waiting for my shepherd assignments. Good, I'll get to that in a moment! BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For a

Re: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

Hi, Great. Please make it available in SVN so that I can review. > Done. The files in SVN are already a little bit further then the source in the release. So there will probably be some small changes. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1408711 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=r