Hi all,
The vote started on 2012-11-6 has ended, it passes with 9 +1 IPMC votes and no
-1 votes.
+1 (IPMC)
* Alan Cabrera
* Tom White
* Alex Karasulu
* Suresh Marru
* Roman Shaposhnik
* Chris Douglas
* Steve Loughran
* Matthew Franklin
* Chris Mattman
+1 (Non-Binding)
* Brock Noland
Thanks to
Please ignore that proposal, the world is already full of projects
with that name :(
looks like I have issues about originality, lately...
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
-
HAHAHAH Junehem, just after Mayhem :D
Christian Grobmeier also suggested My Ham, I thought about a Pata
Negra[1] picture as a logo... WDYT? It makes me feel hungry! :D
Jokes a part, as a martial artist, I thought that the Wado word (Wa =
harmony, Do = way) could be a possible good candidate: shor
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for looking into the release!
>
>
>> -1 (binding) based on the RAT check: my cursory run of RAT
>> (http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html) uncovered
>> 61 Unknown Licenses.
>>
>> Here's what I would like to s
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Empirically, Model 1 did not work. That's been tried over the past ten years.
Yes, and Jukka picked up the gauntlet thrown down by the board and
used the shepherds to turn the situation around. The resulting system
does not feel like a finished
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> I don't know what it takes to become and IPMC member, but I kind of like the
> idea of
> having roles that don't require such formality (I may think too highly of the
> process and
> role), but still can be recognized as providing guidance
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Om wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>>... If that code is indeed not used, I'm ok with treating that as a known
>> problem in the release.
>>
> Yes, I can confirm that the concerned code path is not touched in this
> release. In
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...At the risk of stating the obvious, this also points to a
> "Googleability of a name"
> issue (although with Apache prefix this is typically less of a concern)...
Agreed, IMO having a somewhat unique name is very useful.
I did suggest
On 08.11.2012 19:08, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
> Marvin: Thank you for the helpful feedback. I will discuss this with the
> other devs and raise tickets for us as appropriate. I believe Hyrum has not
> yet voted to my knowledge, only Brane. So we still need two votes at this
> point.
Hyrum voted +1.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> > Looks like when Om built the source archive, some unicode characters got
> > mangled (maybe confused as Windows double-byte?)...
>
> Yes that's probably what happened.
>
> >
Hi,
Thanks for looking into the release!
> -1 (binding) based on the RAT check: my cursory run of RAT
> (http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html) uncovered
> 61 Unknown Licenses.
>
> Here's what I would like to suggest for cutting the new RC:
>1. make it easy to run the RAT check
11 matches
Mail list logo
