Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

Oops, apologies - thanks for the reminder. I uploaded the slides as an attachment on the wiki page. Thanks, Tomer On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > So, no response to my request above about the design docs and > not-TO-DOne MapR presentation? > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:25 P

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

So, no response to my request above about the design docs and not-TO-DOne MapR presentation? On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > +1 -C > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> This is a duplicated attempt at sending this message, please ignore the >> previous

RE: Preparing for August report

I reviewed droids and thought their report adequately represented the project state. -Original Message- From: Jukka Zitting [jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 06:37 PM Eastern Standard Time To: general Subject: Re: Preparing for

DeltaSpike Status - Re: Preparing for August report

Hi - AFAIK Documentation is not a graduation requirement. I was frustrated with the documentation because the lack makes it hard to understand the project, but that is not a blocker. I think the project should start working on graduation soon. They have made a release. The community is active

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

Hi, On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > over the last few days has been quite positive. [x] +1, bring Drill into Incubator BR, Jukka

Re: Preparing for August report

Hi, On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > That leaves only the reviews to be done. Here's the latest TODO list: And an updated one: Benson Margulies - Syncope, Nuvem Dave Fisher - DeltaSpike Matt Franklin- Droids Matt Hogstrom- SIS, Wookie Mohammad Nour

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings Moodle Plugin 1.4 Incubating Release Candidate 1

Hi, On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:44 PM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote: > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings Moodle > Plugin 1.4 Incubating Release Candidate 1 +1 to release (-src.tar.gz MD5 e381dc019e70dde3117bc9021ee2c79e) On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:41 PM, seba.wag...@gma

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

+1 -C (sorry, wrong thread) On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > over the last few days has been quite positive. > > Please cast your vote

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

+1 -C On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > This is a duplicated attempt at sending this message, please ignore the > previous message if it eventually arrives. There appears to be a hangup > sending email from my apache email address via gmail. > > Abstract > > Drill is

Clerezza status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "August2012" by BertrandDelacretaz)

Hi, On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Apache Wiki wrote: > + As in our last report in May, we believe Clerezza should graduate soon, > but > + unfortunately that hasn't happened yet. Activity is currently fairly low, > + and it looks like Clerezza might remain a small/low activity project,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

+1 (blinding) Otis Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase - http://sematext.com/spm  > > From: Ted Dunning >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 10:41 PM >Subject: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator >

Re: [VOTE] (missing 1 IPMC +1) S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

On 08/08/2012 10:51 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote: Hi, I had misinterpreted the vote results and prematurely declared the vote as passed, sorry about that... In reality, we still need 1 IPMC +1 vote for the S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1. Current status after last week's votation is: +1: 7 (5 bindi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

The consensus in the group of committers listed in the proposal is that we would like to discourage piling on of pre-formation committers and encourage adding committers after formation based on contributions. It is clear that there are gobs of people with the credentials and track record to be po

RE: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) >-Original Message- >From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:41 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator > >I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the >Ap

Re: [VOTE] - Establish YARN as a sub-project of Apache Hadoop

Apologies, wrong general@ list - was meant for hadoop. On Aug 8, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Ok, we are nearly there. > > # The new YARN jira is functional now (albeit with some teething issues with > notifications/workflow which should be resolved soon): > https://issues.apache.

Re: [VOTE] - Establish YARN as a sub-project of Apache Hadoop

Ok, we are nearly there. # The new YARN jira is functional now (albeit with some teething issues with notifications/workflow which should be resolved soon): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN # I've committed YARN-1 to move YARN out of hadoop-mapreduce-project onto hadoop-yarn-project i

Re: [RT] a minimal set of docs for incubator.apache.org

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > How about starting a new, minimal set of docs that are more > maintainable and understandable? +1 to accepting that the end result of the documentation overhaul may be quite different from what exists now. -1 to starting from scratch

[VOTE] (missing 1 IPMC +1) S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

Hi, I had misinterpreted the vote results and prematurely declared the vote as passed, sorry about that... In reality, we still need 1 IPMC +1 vote for the S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1. Current status after last week's votation is: +1: 7 (5 binding) -1: 0 Details: +1 IPMC: acmurthy, phu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Alexei Fedotov wrote: > Hello, > > Let me add one more point on adding dependencies to source releases. > In addition to license, the dependence contain copyright statements, > e.g. "# Copyright (C) 2005 Christopher Lenz ". > > As mentioned here http://www.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

Hello, Let me add one more point on adding dependencies to source releases. In addition to license, the dependence contain copyright statements, e.g. "# Copyright (C) 2005 Christopher Lenz ". As mentioned here http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > If the source file is submitted with a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > over the last few days has been quite positive. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring Drill into

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > > over the last few days h

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > over the last few days has been quite positive. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring Drill into

Re: Incubator release task force

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: > >> ...I'd like to start fixing this by forming a "release task force" of a >> handful of volunteers who are ready to invest an hour or two per week >> to work onb) migrating

Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-incubating

+1 (non-binding) -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > On 06/08/2012 16:36, Alexei Fedotov wrote: >> Hello Francesco, >> >> Here are few things I have f

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the >> Apache Incubator... > > +1 +1 cheers, Torsten ---

Re: [RT] a minimal set of docs for incubator.apache.org

Committing somewhere would be good as otherwise I don't know whether I need to suggest the following (I wasn't sure of the best thread for this to go in anyway): May I suggest that, where appropriate, the documentation is backed up with pointers to examples of existing projects that are

Re: [RT] a minimal set of docs for incubator.apache.org

Commit the content. Otherwise, we're just hand-waving. On Aug 8, 2012 5:29 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote: > Hi, > > Like others, I'm not too happy with the current > http://incubator.apache.org/ content. > > How about starting a new, minimal set of docs that are more > maintainable and understa

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > Apache Incubator... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org Fo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> Wasn't clear, can I add myself now? > > Didn't the Incubator go back to discouraging open enrollment?... AFAIK, no. What was discussed is that incoming podlings should clearly state

[RT] a minimal set of docs for incubator.apache.org

Hi, Like others, I'm not too happy with the current http://incubator.apache.org/ content. How about starting a new, minimal set of docs that are more maintainable and understandable? IMO, the following would be sufficient, with one page per topic: 1. What's the Apache Incubator? (homepage) 2. L

Re: Incubator release task force

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > ...I'd like to start fixing this by forming a "release task force" of a > handful of volunteers who are ready to invest an hour or two per week > to work onb) migrating > /dist/incubator to svnpubsub by the end of this year... I'm inter

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

On 08/08/2012 04:41, Ted Dunning wrote: I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion over the last few days has been quite positive. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring Drill into Incubator [ ] +0, I d

Re: Incubator release task force

Hi, For people interested in working on this, the ongoing Bloodhound release vote has triggered some good discussion that would be great to capture somehow. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incuba

Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

Hello, On 8/7/12 4:30 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote: > On 08/07/2012 06:36 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the >> vote deadline: >> >> +1: 7 (5 binding) >> -1: 0 >> >> Details: >> >> +1 IPMC: >> acmurthy, phunt >> >> +1 PPMC >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, ant elder wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >>... >>> You can look at the archives back in 2006 when it was incubating. In >>> particular, there is one sent to private@incubator that I w