Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Jakob Homan
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > No reason at all. > Sorry. I may have been unclear. I was requesting that the design docs which are being referenced in the proposal: "The requirement and design documents are currently stored in MapR Technologies' source code repository. They

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Alex Karasulu
+1 (binding) On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > +1 (binding). Good luck and sounds cool! > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Aug 7, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Arun C Murthy
On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> Wasn't clear, can I add myself now? > > Didn't the Incubator go back to discouraging open enrollment? > > Is it OK to be invited in based on merit later, or do you feel that due to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Devaraj Das
+1 (binding) On Aug 7, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > over the last few days has been quite positive. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, brin

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Arun C Murthy
+1 (binding) On Aug 7, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > over the last few days has been quite positive. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, brin

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
+1 (binding). Good luck and sounds cool! Cheers, Chris On Aug 7, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > over the last few days has been quite positive. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Ashish
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > over the last few days has been quite positive. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Wasn't clear, can I add myself now? Didn't the Incubator go back to discouraging open enrollment? Is it OK to be invited in based on merit later, or do you feel that due to the nature of this project, it's essential to be in on the ground

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>The incubator filters projects on the basis of the likeliness of them >>becoming successful meritocratic communities. The basic requirements for >>incubation are: >> >> * a working codebase -- over the years and after

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Arun C Murthy
Ted, Wasn't clear, can I add myself now? thanks, Arun On Aug 6, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Sounds like some good pull. I will call a vote tomorrow. > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> Agreed, likewise. >> >> I'd love to get involved and would like to a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Scott Deboy
+1 (binding) On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > over the last few days has been quite positive. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, b

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Ted Dunning
Just sent that out. Thanks for the encouragement! On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > I concur with Andrzej. Let's see that VOTE Ted! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

[VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Ted Dunning
I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion over the last few days has been quite positive. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring Drill into Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care either way, [ ] -1, do not bring

Amber - A Shepherd's View

2012-08-07 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
Community looks well on the way to graduation. Congratulations on the recent release. There are a few things on the status page that need to be filled in and processes [1] like suitable name search need to be completed prior to graduation vote at the IPMC level. [1]:http://incubator.apache.org/g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, ant elder wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >... >> You can look at the archives back in 2006 when it was incubating. In >> particular, there is one sent to private@incubator that I would refer >> you to: >> http://s.apache.org/c04 [only

Re: Status of Blur?

2012-08-07 Thread Tim Williams
Hi Otis, Nice! yeah, we're bootstrapping now... join us on blur-dev@i.a.o and blur-user@i.a.o http://incubator.apache.org/projects/blur.html The ticket's in now to get the git repo up too. Thanks, --tim On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Hi, > > What's the word on Blur

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
I concur with Andrzej.  Let's see that VOTE Ted! Otis  Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase - http://sematext.com/spm  > > From: Andrzej Bialecki >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 5:51 PM >Subject: Re: [PR

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder wrote: >>> Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies >>> in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in S

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
On 07/08/2012 21:14, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: -Original Message- From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:25 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Grant Ingersoll; Isabel Drost Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator On Th

[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, [branching a discuss thread] On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > As I replied to Marvin, Apache Roller had a hard dependency on > Hibernate for some of its incubator releases. Allowing that was okay'd > by the IPMC, VP Legal, and the Board :-) > > My view is that these are n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:38 PM, ant elder wrote: >... > Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies > in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't > recall any releases like that. As I replied to Marvin, Apache Roller had a hard dependency on Hib

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder wrote: >> Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies >> in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't >> recall any releases like that. > > I know

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder wrote: > Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies > in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't > recall any releases like that. I know AOO had interactions with Legal regarding dmake, dictionaries a

RE: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
>-Original Message- >From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com] >Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:25 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Cc: Grant Ingersoll; Isabel Drost >Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator > >On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning >wr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:14 AM, ant elder wrote: >>... >> This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening >> right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery >> but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE fil

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:14 AM, ant elder wrote: >... > This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening > right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery > but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised > people are continuing to vote +1

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

2012-08-07 Thread Tomer Shiran
FYI: I have posted the proposal to the wiki and updated it based on the feedback from Marvin and Jakob: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DrillProposal On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > In fact, a big part of the motivation for proposing incubation before code > is ready is exa

Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

2012-08-07 Thread Richard Frovarp
On 08/07/2012 06:36 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote: Hi, The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the vote deadline: +1: 7 (5 binding) -1: 0 Details: +1 IPMC: acmurthy, phunt +1 PPMC kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj +1 wider community Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla Thanks to all

Re: [VOTE] Release Droids 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

2012-08-07 Thread Richard Frovarp
On 07/09/2012 11:19 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote: A 0.2.0-incubating release candidate has been created. This will be the second release of Apache Droids incubating. We have 3 +1 votes, with 1 +1 IPMC vote (rfrovarp). We are in need of 2 more IPMC votes. Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.or

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-incubating

2012-08-07 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi all, even though we would have reached the required number of +1 from IPMC members after the required 72 hours, I still have the feeling that we are missing some consensus here. I will now revert the current release candidate and start again from scratch with another attempt. Regards. O

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread Gary Martin
On 08/07/2012 12:39 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: On 07.08.2012 13:14, ant elder wrote: This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised people are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.08.2012 13:14, ant elder wrote: > This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening > right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery > but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised > people are continuing to vote +1 on the Syncope r

{RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

2012-08-07 Thread Matthieu Morel
Hi, The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the vote deadline: +1: 7 (5 binding) -1: 0 Details: +1 IPMC: acmurthy, phunt +1 PPMC kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj +1 wider community Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla Thanks to all the participants to the voting process! I'll

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Gary Martin wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release > Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the > Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC members > Greg Stein a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)

2012-08-07 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Aug 6, 2012 7:07 PM, "Gary Martin" wrote: >>... >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm > UTC on Thursday 9th August. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 >> [ ] +0 Don't care >> [

Re: Wiki write access

2012-08-07 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Tomer Shiran wrote: > I would like to create a Wiki page. Can you please grant me write access? > (alias tshiran) Added to ContributorsGroup. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge

Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-incubating

2012-08-07 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 (binding) apart from the jQuery question it looks fine. You might btw be carefull with the samples. If we publish a WAR which contains other libraries, then this might be interpreted as 'distributing' them. In OpenWebBeans, DeltaSpike and MyFaces we don't deploy them any longer in binary