On Aug 6, 2012 7:07 PM, "Gary Martin" wrote:
>...
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
Repeating
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 August 2012 8:37 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to reque
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC
members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
The result of the vote is summarised here
In fact, a big part of the motivation for proposing incubation before code is
ready is exactly to foster the discussions needed to form community.
It is true that many projects that start without the fundamentals face
challenges that more mature projects face but that is really just a fact of
No reason at all.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:55 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Any reason the design docs can't be put up in place of where the
> source would normally go?
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
>> Marvin, thanks for commenting on the proposal! The i
Any reason the design docs can't be put up in place of where the
source would normally go?
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
> Marvin, thanks for commenting on the proposal! The initial committers have
> been working on the design for several months, and will commit the design
I would like to create a Wiki page. Can you please grant me write access?
(alias tshiran)
Thanks,
Tomer
Marvin, thanks for commenting on the proposal! The initial committers have
been working on the design for several months, and will commit the design
once the project is approved, so we do not expect much friction during the
design phase. With that said, we certainly do want to engage others early
o
Your vote is welcome :)
However we still need 3 IPMCs to vote.
As the plugins packages are only 45KByte in size and have zero dependencies
I hope it might be quite easy to review.
Sebastian
2012/8/6 Maxim Solodovnik
> +1 (not sure if I need to vote or not :) )
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:44 PM
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Initial Source
> ==
> There is no initial source code. All source code will be developed within
> the Apache Incubator.
Coming in without any source code is going to pose a challenge to this
podling.
http://www.apache.org/foun
Sounds like some good pull. I will call a vote tomorrow.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Agreed, likewise.
>
> I'd love to get involved and would like to add myself whenever you are
> ready.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> On Aug 3, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> > On
On 06/08/2012 16:36, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Hello Francesco,
>
> Here are few things I have found via manual inspection:
>
> 1. Jquery bundle contains several following strings: "Dual licensed
> under the MIT or GPL Version 2 licenses."
> *) source release LICENSE file does not contain MIT license
Agreed, likewise.
I'd love to get involved and would like to add myself whenever you are ready.
thanks,
Arun
On Aug 3, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> Drill is a distributed system for interactive analysis of large-scale
>> data
On 06/08/2012 16:26, ant elder wrote:
> I've had a quick look and it mostly looks fine to me except in the source
> distribution it contains jquery and codemirror .js files but i couldn't see
> any mention of their licenses anywhere. Sorry if i've just missed that but
> otherwise i think the src di
Hello Francesco,
Here are few things I have found via manual inspection:
1. Jquery bundle contains several following strings: "Dual licensed
under the MIT or GPL Version 2 licenses."
*) source release LICENSE file does not contain MIT license;
*) and the file itself does not look like APL license
I've had a quick look and it mostly looks fine to me except in the source
distribution it contains jquery and codemirror .js files but i couldn't see
any mention of their licenses anywhere. Sorry if i've just missed that but
otherwise i think the src distro top level LICENSE file needs to be update
On 06/08/2012 16:07, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi Francesco, I can check in the evening.
Thanks, Mark!
> - Original Message -
>> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 2:49 PM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-incub
Hi Francesco, I can check in the evening.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 2:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-incubating
>
> Hi IPMC members,
> we are missing a s
Hi IPMC members,
we are missing a single vote on this release: anyone interested to check?
TIA.
Regards.
On 03/08/2012 09:58, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> I've created a 1.0.0-incubating release, with the following artifacts up
> for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1367421):
> https://svn.apache.
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Reports from Ambari, Clerezza and NPanday are still missing.
I see no signs of the Ambari report coming up, so I'm pushing it to
next month. Ambari team (cc'd), please prepare a status report by
September 5th.
The Clerezza report is jus
Hi,
Thanks for the report, PhotArk!
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Apache Wiki wrote:
> + PhotArk started as a project with no initial code-base, and we have
> + grown the community to the minimal independent committer size required
> + for graduation. We need to make these contributors c
21 matches
Mail list logo
