HI Alexei,
It seems that you have sent various requests in advance of this one through
channels other than general@. This is not appreciated by busy people who do
read general@.
Please have patience, the Incubator release process can take some time. IPMC
members are busy volunteers many of who
>-Original Message-
>From: Tommaso Teofili [mailto:tommaso.teof...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:55 AM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Amber 0.22-incubating
>
>Anyone else from the IPMC willing to review this ?
I will try to review this
The vote as passed with following results:
+1 IPMC
yegor, aadamchik, aadamchik, hadrian, jukka, jbonofre
+1 PPMC
aaf, solomax, albus, german, sebawagner
+1 wider community
Irina, Baskar
Vote Threads:
http://markmail.org/message/pmuiv4mghmavibqf
http://markmail.org/thread/z3pxsqacpvvafqtp
Seba
@Jukka: About No3 *My test build failed trying to svn checkout stuff
from red5 trunk.*
=> In 99% of all cases this is connected because googlecode SVN is
down because of heavy usage. This should only happen occasionally.
I will forward the other points to our dev list to discuss them further.
Than
Hi Ross,
we will be happy to get your feedback on the release,
but there is no need to rush, we got enough IPMC votes now to proceed
Sebastian
2012/7/25 Ross Gardler :
> On 23 July 2012 05:50, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
>> Jukka, thanks for explaining.
>>
>> Ross, Andrus,
>> would you please conside
Blur has been accepted into the incubator with the following vote tally:
+1 : 15 (10 binding)
-1 : 0
Patrick
vote details:
Dave Fisher (binding)
Bill Graham
Tim Williams (binding)
Jukka Zitting (binding)
Mohammad Nour El-Din (binding)
Patrick Hunt (binding)
Ashish Paliwal
Olivier Lamy (binding)
Hi Fabio,
I'm taking a look. Thanks for the reminder.
Regards
JB
On 07/25/2012 06:01 PM, Fabio Martelli wrote:
Hi IPMC members,
sorry for the disturb but Apache Syncope needs your review. We still need
just one vote.
Please, let us have your feedbacks/votes for 1.0.0-RC3-incubating release.
Hi IPMC members,
sorry for the disturb but Apache Syncope needs your review. We still need
just one vote.
Please, let us have your feedbacks/votes for 1.0.0-RC3-incubating release.
Best regards,
F.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fabio Martelli
Date: Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:21 AM
S
+1 (binding)
Reviewing the artifacts look good to me.
Regards
JB
On 07/25/2012 04:14 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
+1 (binding)
I went through the artifacts and everything looks in order.
Hadrian
On 07/23/2012 06:03 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
The Openmeetings community voted on and has approved
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Alexei Fedotov
wrote:
> The Openmeetings community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> Openmeetings 2.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
> Policy and with the endorsement of two of our mentors we would now
> like to request th
+1 (binding)
I went through the artifacts and everything looks in order.
Hadrian
On 07/23/2012 06:03 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
The Openmeetings community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
Openmeetings 2.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy and with the endo
On 23 July 2012 05:50, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Jukka, thanks for explaining.
>
> Ross, Andrus,
> would you please consider voting for the Openmeetings release? We are stuck
> with insufficient number of votes. Thanks!
Apologies - I've been on the road for nearly three weeks. I'm back now
but deal
[X] +1, bring Blur into Incubator
Eric
On 07/20/2012 06:42 PM, Aaron McCurry wrote:
I would like to call a vote for accepting Blur for incubation in the
Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below.
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1, bring Blur into Incubator
[ ] +0, I don't care either
+1
Tom
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Aaron McCurry wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting Blur for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring Blur into Incubator
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> [ ]
Senaka, folks, release has not been deployed to the official page yet - we
need an approve first.
Here are few links to release artifacts:
Main changes are covered in the Readme:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC4/README
Full Changelog:
http://svn.apache.org/repos
Anyone else from the IPMC willing to review this ?
Thanks in advance,
Tommaso
2012/7/21 Raymond Feng
> +1 from me.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:33 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
> > Good morning IPMC,
> >
> > I'm writing today to submit you the VOTE of the first release ever of
16 matches
Mail list logo
