Hi IPMC members,
sorry for the disturb but Apache Syncope needs your review.
Please, let us have your feedbacks/votes for 1.0.0-RC2-incubating release.
Best regards,
F.
Inizio messaggio inoltrato:
> Da: Fabio Martelli
> Data: 28 giugno 2012 15.07.12 GMT+02.00
> A: general@incubator.apache.or
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 July 2012, 10:00:00 PST. The report
for your podling will for
Hi Jukka,
We had started a vote (on 05/26/2012) to bring on board a new committer
(Preston Carman) who has been submitting high-quality patches. While the
vote got +1s from all the current VXQuery committers (four of us), we
have not heard from any of our mentors. So the vote itself is stuck.
On Jun 30, 2012, at 5:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation
> of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve) which will serve as
> the project behind our STV and voting tools.
>
> The impetus behind this was when I suggested to the Open
On Jul 1, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Let me try this again.
>
>> Chuckwa looks pretty normal; report in place, traffic on mailing list.
>> I don't see any particular cause for concern. It's one of our podlings that
> is all set except for not having added committers. Mentors, d
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Let me try this again.
>>
>>> Chuckwa looks pretty normal; report in place, traffic on mailing list.
>>> I don't see any particular cause for concern. It's one of our podlings th
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Let me try this again.
>
>> Chuckwa looks pretty normal; report in place, traffic on mailing list.
>> I don't see any particular cause for concern. It's one of our podlings that
> is all set except for not having added committers. Mentors,
Le 7/1/12 9:00 PM, Niklas Gustavsson a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
In preparation for reviewing the hopefully upcoming report, I gave a
brief look at how things are in the AWF podling.
Unfortunately l see zero activity since April, which suggests that the
tempo
Let me try this again.
> Chuckwa looks pretty normal; report in place, traffic on mailing list.
> I don't see any particular cause for concern. It's one of our podlings that
is all set except for not having added committers. Mentors, do you think
they could graduate anyhow?
>
> Neither DirectMemo
Chuckwa looks pretty normal; report in place, traffic on mailing list.
I don't see any particular cause for concern.
Neither DirectMemory or Mesos has filed a report yet, but also their
dev lists look pretty good. DirectMemory does seem to lack a developer
resource page on their web site that poin
I'm going on vacation on Friday, so I'll send a summary on Thursday.
I'll be away for 10 days, so I won't be available to act on a decision
to retire the podling.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1...
>
> I'd say at least the normal 72 hours.
>
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:29
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> In preparation for reviewing the hopefully upcoming report, I gave a
> brief look at how things are in the AWF podling.
>
> Unfortunately l see zero activity since April, which suggests that the
> temporary activity drop mentioned in the April
Hi Jukka,
On Jul 1, 2012, at 5:20 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> Is there already a community in terms of a group of people who drive
>> this forward and who are willing to continue? Or is this a random set
>> of people who wi
Hi,
In preparation for reviewing the hopefully upcoming report, I gave a
brief look at how things are in the AWF podling.
Unfortunately l see zero activity since April, which suggests that the
temporary activity drop mentioned in the April report has become a
more permanent state.
AWF mentors, c
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Is there already a community in terms of a group of people who drive
> this forward and who are willing to continue? Or is this a random set
> of people who will likely go away after creation of the TLP?
The svn log of the voter to
Incubation is unnecessary process in this case. I don't see any reason
this should go through incubation.
--tim
On Saturday, June 30, 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation
> of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve) which will serv
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Since all code was developed w/i the ASF, by ASF people, and
> is under the ALv2 (either implied/confirmed by the authors or
> explicit in the code itself), there is some debate on whether
> or not Incubation is even required... The board wou
- Original Message -
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: Mark Struberg ; general
>> Another question: for which case do you like to use the voting tool?
>
> The idea is not to make it more widely used inside the ASF (we all have
> access to it and know where it is already). The idea is to make
18 matches
Mail list logo
