On Jun 30, 2012 9:34 PM, "Mark Struberg" wrote:
>
> Another question: for which case do you like to use the voting tool?
The idea is not to make it more widely used inside the ASF (we all have
access to it and know where it is already). The idea is to make it more
visible and accessible to extern
Another question: for which case do you like to use the voting tool?
Imo this makes only sense for invite votes. And even for those it's sometimes
important to be able to cast additional notes.
For technical votes it is de facto always the case that I like to see if people
like it straight awa
+1 for straight to TLP given the individuals and code provenance.
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
>Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 8:24 AM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Board will be proposing a new TLP
>
>For those not following board@, the b
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation
> of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve) which will serve as
> the project behind our STV and voting tools.
+1 to proceed directly to steve.apache.org.
Incubation i
Looks good to me
+1 :)
On Jun 30, 2012 12:28 PM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > This so far has lead us to the conclusion that there really isn't any
> > "incubating" that needs to be done.
> >
> > I'd like to open the topic up for discuss
+1 on the proposal itself and how it will go directly through the board
I also agree /w what has been said and replied to by both Emmanuel & Alex
On Jun 30, 2012 3:32 PM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
> > Le 6/30/12 2:23 PM, Jim Jagielski a
+1 straight to TLP
-- dims
On Jun 30, 2012, at 7:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation
> of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve) which will serve as
> the project behind our STV and voting tools.
>
> The impetus behind this wa
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 6/30/12 2:23 PM, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
>>
>> Since all code was developed w/i the ASF, by ASF people, and
>> is under the ALv2 (either implied/confirmed by the authors or
>> explicit in the code itself), there is some debate on wheth
Le 6/30/12 2:23 PM, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
Since all code was developed w/i the ASF, by ASF people, and
is under the ALv2 (either implied/confirmed by the authors or
explicit in the code itself), there is some debate on whether
or not Incubation is even required...
Sure we should go through incu
For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation
of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve) which will serve as
the project behind our STV and voting tools.
The impetus behind this was when I suggested to the OpenStack
people to use STV for their voting system, which kind of
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> This so far has lead us to the conclusion that there really isn't any
> "incubating" that needs to be done.
>
> I'd like to open the topic up for discussion.
Here's what I wrote about this on board@:
There's plenty of precedent of existing
Background: over a period of time, the ASF has developed a number of
tools that help with voting processes. These are used to vote in new
boards and members. From time to time, they have also been used by
various PMCs.
These tools are currently located in a foundation private location:
http
12 matches
Mail list logo
