+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
- Reply message -
From: "Benson Margulies"
To:
Subject: [VOTE] Retire Kato
Date: Wed, Jun 27, 2012 1:29 am
Based on the status of this podling as reported in the
+1
Craig
On Jun 26, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board
report, I propose that the IPMC retire the Kato podling.
I'm not sure how long a vote for this should remain open.
here is my +1.
-
+1
- Original Message -
> From: Benson Margulies
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:29 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Retire Kato
>
> Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board
> report, I propose that the IPMC retire the Kato podlin
+1 binding
-- dims
On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:20 PM, "Alan D. Cabrera" wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board
>> report, I propose that the IPMC retire the Kato pod
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 26, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board
> report, I propose that the IPMC retire the Kato podling.
>
> I'm not sure how long a vote for this should remain open.
>
> here is my +1.
>
> -
Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board
report, I propose that the IPMC retire the Kato podling.
I'm not sure how long a vote for this should remain open.
here is my +1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: genera
2012/6/26 sebb :
> Where is the SVN tag for the release?
Here are the SVN tags.
- source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating
tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating
- stanbol-parent-1-incubating
tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stan
+1
Apologies, I intended to vote as a mentor, I'd actually done the
checks and then... (you know the rest)
On 26 June 2012 16:26, Fabian Christ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC3).
>
> This release has already passed the PPMC vote [1] with
>
> +1 : 4
On 26 June 2012 16:26, Fabian Christ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC3).
>
> This release has already passed the PPMC vote [1] with
>
> +1 : 4 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 1 IPMC vote)
> 0 : 0 votes
> -1 : 0 votes
>
> So, we need at least 2 more
Hi,
please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC3).
This release has already passed the PPMC vote [1] with
+1 : 4 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 1 IPMC vote)
0 : 0 votes
-1 : 0 votes
So, we need at least 2 more votes from IPMC members.
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/grjbi
On 26 June 2012 14:46, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:40 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 26 June 2012 13:28, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
>>>
>>> About correct attribution of ASF JARs
>>> Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ?
>
On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:40 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 June 2012 13:28, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
>>
>> About correct attribution of ASF JARs
>> Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ?
>
> The recipient of the package needs to be able to
On 26 June 2012 13:28, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
>
> About correct attribution of ASF JARs
> Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ?
The recipient of the package needs to be able to quickly find the
license associated with all jars, so
Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
About correct attribution of ASF JARs
Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ?
Must the name of the JAR file be _exactly_ mentioned in the LICENSE file?
For example:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/LICENSE?vie
On 26 June 2012 12:43, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
bcprov
commons-beanutils
commons-codec
commons-collections
ehcache-core
httpclient
httpcore
etc.
Not as many as I thought at first glance, but still quite a lot.
> About License VS
On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:43 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
>
> About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
>
>
> "The NOTICE document is f
@Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
"The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution statements
those licenses may requ
On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
>
> There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> Results:
> PPMC:
> aaf +1
My Vote is +1 :)
2012/6/26 seba.wag...@gmail.com
> Hi,
>
> that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
>
> There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> Results:
> PPMC:
> aaf +1
Hi,
that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
Results:
PPMC:
aaf +1 (mentor)
solomax +1
eschwert +1
alvaro +1
Wider Community: 3 times
20 matches
Mail list logo
