Hi Nick,
I'm top posting because it is clear to me what is happening here:
(1) The Title of the AOO blog is "Apache OpenOffice (Incubating)"
(2) The Title of various blog entries includes the phrase "Apache OpenOffice",
but not the phrase "Apache OpenOffice (incubating)".
I have the karma and
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 16:01 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:55 PM, drew wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 15:42 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> >> >> On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Ni
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:55 PM, drew wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 15:42 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
>> >> On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Nor what appears on planet.apache
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 15:42 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> >> On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote:
> >>
> >> > Nor what appears on planet.apache.org, featuring the article that first
> >> > struck
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
>> On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>> > Nor what appears on planet.apache.org, featuring the article that first
>> > struck me
>> > as using the name in a way I wouldn't expect when I re
@Nick,
Ross offered to come to the AOOi PPMC to fix it. I'm not clear what the PPMC
has to do with it.
Specifically, @TheASF is not of AOOi PPMC origin. The question is, who is
expected to do something about that and how is it to be communicated to them?
Someone else is responsible for thos
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> > Nor what appears on planet.apache.org, featuring the article that first
> > struck me
> > as using the name in a way I wouldn't expect when I read it in my feed
> > reader:
> > http://www.robweir
On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote:
> Nor what appears on planet.apache.org, featuring the article that first
> struck me
> as using the name in a way I wouldn't expect when I read it in my feed reader:
> http://www.robweir.com/blog/2012/06/pache-openoffice-34-downloads.html
Following tha
On 23 Jun 2012, at 18:48, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Nick, the AOOi project does not write those tweets from @TheASF and they are
> not under AOOi control.
>
> Are these and blog text occurrences the ones that attracted your attention or
> are there others?
>
> If you follow the links to t
Nick, the AOOi project does not write those tweets from @TheASF and they are
not under AOOi control.
Are these and blog text occurrences the ones that attracted your attention or
are there others?
If you follow the links to the referenced blog posts you will see that the full
term is used in
On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> Kevan-
Hi Chris,
Thanks for elaborating.
>
> Please appreciate that there is universal agreement that (1) listing
> and maintaining all transitive dependencies and licenses is a sound
> service
It's more than "sound". We are required to mee
Thanks Nick, I'll pick it up with the PPMC.
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Jun 23, 2012 8:24 AM, "Nick Kew" wrote:
>
> On 23 Jun 2012, at 06:47, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> > If you identified the public places and were more specific about it, it
> would help
On 23 Jun 2012, at 06:47, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> If you identified the public places and were more specific about it, it would
> help us to clean it up as appropriate.
In fact the word pair "Apache OpenOffice" appears no fewer than three times
on the front page www.apache.org at this momen
13 matches
Mail list logo
