On 6/14/12, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Kato is not an ASF project (yet), so wouldn't it just be rm'd rather than
>> moving to the Attic?
>
> Well, let's try to solve this once and for all. Sure, Kato is not a
> full-fledged ASF process Incuba
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Josh Thompson wrote:
> Given the positive feedback from Jukka Zitting and no negative feedback, I'd
> like to request a vote for the graduation of VCL as a TLP to be proposed to
> the ASF Board at the June board meeting.
+1 yes, VCL should graduate
BR,
J
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Gianugo Rabellino
wrote:
> As an Attic PMC member, who is also very well aware of lack of
> volunteers over there, I couldn't be happier with a policy stating
> that failed incubating projects are just rm'd, but I don't think we
> never came up with a clear d
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Kato is not an ASF project (yet), so wouldn't it just be rm'd rather than
> moving to the Attic?
Well, let's try to solve this once and for all. Sure, Kato is not a
full-fledged ASF process Incubator-wise, but at the same time it may
have pass
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:55 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> Agreed. There was some interest in Kato earlier when they finally figured
>> out that they don't need to wait for Oracle, but I suppose everyone with a
>> real itch to scratch had
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
> I think the Bigtop report is in good shape. From my viewpoint, Bigtop is
> getting close
> to graduating; but, I would defer to the mentors who know the project best.
> It would
> be nice to see some activity from more of the
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi Jukka, I agree they should create a release soon, however it's just
> been 9 months (sept 2011) not 1.5 yrs since incubation started.
Ah, sorry about that. I mixed up the entry date with another podling.
Anyway, is there some specif
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
>> + 1. Still working towards an initial release on Apache with the current
>> + code (version 0.4 = version 0.3 + checkpointing + bugfixes)
>
> Is there some specific issue blocking t
The report does not list the top issues for graduation. Also, it appears that
there were some practices that are not quite inline with recommendations;
though, the mentors have appeared to address this. Other than that, activity
and community appear to be strong.
-
Great report. The only comment I have after reviewing the community is that
the incubator status page needs to be updated as it is completely empty.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For addition
I think the Bigtop report is in good shape. From my viewpoint, Bigtop is
getting close to graduating; but, I would defer to the mentors who know the
project best. It would be nice to see some activity from more of the
committers though...
--
puh, important topic.
There are clearly 2 different scenarios
1.) An ASF project which certainly has passed all our license requirements and
now became inactive -> attic
2.) An incubator project where it is not clear if they passed all our license
requirements and IP checks -> somewhere else
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Benson Margulies
> >
> wrote:
>> The three listed mentors don't have time to deal with this. I'm told
>> that Joe volunteered to help out here.
I'm one of the listed mentors, its not so much that i
Kato is not an ASF project (yet), so wouldn't it just be rm'd rather than
moving to the Attic?
On Jun 11, 2012 6:07 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
> Wearing the very small hat of shepherd, I write to start a discussion
> of moving Kato to the attic.
>
> The last sign of activity was at the last re
14 matches
Mail list logo
