Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Tommaso Teofili
+1 Tommaso 2012/6/5 Arvind Prabhakar > This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator. > > Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine > new committers and made two signifiant releases following the ASF policies > and guidelines. The communi

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-06-05 Thread David Crossley
Sam Ruby wrote: > V3 of the interface: > > https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq > https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq/incubator > > Key changes: > > 1) initially start out with two moderator input fields, both marked as > required. > > 2) a paste of a list of (either comma or space separate

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 3.2.0-incubating (candidate 1)

2012-06-05 Thread Tom White
+1 I checked the signature and checksums, inspected the source tag, ran a RAT report, checked the disclaimer, notice and license files. Tom On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > Dear Incubator PMCs, > > Oozie Incubator community has voted on the Oozie 3.2.0-incubating relea

Re: diversity

2012-06-05 Thread Sam Ruby
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > There is no diversity requirement at the ASF. On one hand, I definitely agree with you. Derby graduated without meeting the diversity requirement. That being said, I would like to bring up one thing: I have found it *very* handy when ap

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Ralph Goers
+1 (binding) Ralph On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:17 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator. > > Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine > new committers and made two signifiant releases following the ASF po

Re: diversity

2012-06-05 Thread Ralph Goers
Thanks Roy. Yes, I would like the diversity section modified, although I'm not quite sure how I'd reword it. Even if it isn't, your post below can always be referenced again to aid anyone else who may be confused. Ralph On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:00 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" wrote: > On Jun 5, 2012,

[PROPOSAL] Busilet Proposal [Modified]

2012-06-05 Thread Neng Geng Huang
Dear Incubator PMC : I would like to ask that you accept the following proposal for a new incubator project at Apache. Sorry, I don't receive the previous post from general@incubator.apache.org, so I post it again, also made some change in background section. Sorry for the inconvenience. Please r

Re: diversity

2012-06-05 Thread Joe Schaefer
We have an Attic fer Christ-sakes, and in it lies the carcass of Apache Harmony, which died because IBM pulled out.  BFD, that was not a failing of the org, nor the IPMC, when it considered Harmony for graduation.  Shit happens. Our license does not promise that a project will live forever.  Neit

Re: diversity

2012-06-05 Thread Benson Margulies
The diversity (so-called) requirement is often stated in terms of the risk of the project being stranded if a company changes course. From what I see around the Foundation, this is usually a risk much akin to the risk of all the air molecules congregating in one corner of the room at the board F2F,

diversity

2012-06-05 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Jun 5, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I posted an email earlier today where I discussed my confusion over the > diversity requirement. I'm not comfortable doing anything without getting > some feedback on whether the diversity requirement, as currently stated on > the wiki, is correc

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jun 5, 2012, at 4:10 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: >> I posted an email earlier today where I discussed my confusion over the >> diversity >> requirement. I'm not comfortable doing anything without getting some >> feedback >> on

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I posted an email earlier today where I discussed my confusion over the > diversity > requirement.  I'm not comfortable doing anything without getting some feedback > on whether the diversity requirement, as currently stated on the wiki,

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 3.2.0-incubating (candidate 1)

2012-06-05 Thread Patrick Hunt
+1. sig/xsum verified. The RAT report looks good. I ran through the incubator release checklist and all of the items seem to be covered. I was able to run all of the unit tests successfully. Patrick On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > Dear Incubator PMCs, > > Oozie Incub

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jun 5, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > > Based on some digging, I think what you are mostly facing is a battle of > perception. As not everyone has read or is privy to the private list > discussions, what they see is that you have a standing -1 vote from a mentor > who ha

RE: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
>-Original Message- >From: Arvind Prabhakar [mailto:arv...@apache.org] >Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:22 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks) > >On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012

[PROPOSAL] Busilet Proposal

2012-06-05 Thread Neng Geng Huang
Dear Incubator PMC : I would like to ask that you accept the following proposal for a new incubator project at Apache. Best regards Huang Neng Geng Project Proposal: Busilet Author: Huang Neng Geng (mailto: huan...@gmail.com) Date: June 4, 2012 Statsu: Draft ***

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be > >> reached and allow people to move on. > > > > W

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Patrick Hunt
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be >> reached and allow people to move on. > > When diversity concerns were raised in the ManifoldCF podling by Jukka

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be > reached and allow people to move on. When diversity concerns were raised in the ManifoldCF podling by Jukka, graduation was delayed to address them. When diversity concer

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Ralph Goers
I suppose. But i guess I'd rather vote on whether diversity is a requirement for graduation before I voted on the graduation itself. Ralph On Jun 5, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be > reached and allow people to move

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Upayavira
Not really. Generally it is best for a vote to be a proof of consensus, especially for bigger topics (like graduation). And I certainly would add a -1 vote were a project attempting to override a mentor. Upayavira On Tue, Jun 5, 2012, at 09:53 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Isn't this why we vote. To

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Mike Percy
[x] +1 Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator Mike On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator. > > Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine > new committers and made two

Re: June reports in two weeks

2012-06-05 Thread Patrick Hunt
Btw, S4 is short a mentor. It would be great if one or two IPMC members could volunteer and help Arun and I with mentorship duties. Regards, Patrick On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Hi Jukka, I'm also concerned for S4 not having a release and low > activity. I pinged them

Re: June reports in two weeks

2012-06-05 Thread Patrick Hunt
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> There is currently no shepherd assigned, someone want to volunteer >> or doesn't it make sense at this point? > > I'll give a closer look at your upcoming report unless someone beats > me to it. I guess you're still busy setting things up, so

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Patrick Hunt
Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be reached and allow people to move on. Patrick On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > The graduation requirements say > > "The project is considered to have a diverse community when it is not highly > depend

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] cTAKES for the Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Ross Gardler
+1 Note, it best to start a new thread for votes since some mail clients (like mine) will hide the vote in the previous discussion thread. >From a mobile device - forgive errors and terseness On Jun 5, 2012 4:36 PM, "Chen, Pei" wrote: > Hi, > We are proposing cTAKES to be an Apache Incubator Pr

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] cTAKES for the Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
+1 (binding). Really looking forward to mentoring this project. Cheers, Chris On Jun 5, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Chen, Pei wrote: > Hi, > We are proposing cTAKES to be an Apache Incubator Project and would like to > request that the IPMC vote for cTAKES to join the Incubator. > Below, you will find t

RE: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] cTAKES for the Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Chen, Pei
Including the original Proposal raw text below this time: Hi, We are proposing cTAKES to be an Apache Incubator Project and would like to request that the IPMC vote for cTAKES to join the Incubator. Below, you will find the original proposal and details. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1 to recommen

[VOTE] [PROPOSAL] cTAKES for the Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Chen, Pei
Hi, We are proposing cTAKES to be an Apache Incubator Project and would like to request that the IPMC vote for cTAKES to join the Incubator. Below, you will find the original proposal and details. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1 to recommend cTAKES to be an Apache Incubator Project [ ] 0 don't care

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Ralph Goers
The graduation requirements say "The project is considered to have a diverse community when it is not highly dependent on any single contributor (there are at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no single company or entity that is vital to the success of the project). Basica

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Alan Gates
On Jun 5, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: >> Another way of looking at these same statistics: >> Cloudera - 217 >> Other - 16 >> >> That means Cloudera is responsible for over 93% of the Jira issues. It is >> great that Clouder

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

2012-06-05 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Another way of  looking at these same statistics: > Cloudera - 217 > Other - 16 > > That means Cloudera is responsible for over 93% of the Jira issues.  It is > great that Cloudera is doing so much work but those stats hardly prove > diversity

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Brock Noland
[ X ] +1 Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > > [ X ] +1 Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator > > Jarcec > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:17:57AM -0700, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > > This is a call for vote to graduate Flume

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> [ X ] +1 Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator Jarcec On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:17:57AM -0700, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator. > > Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine > new committe

[VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Arvind Prabhakar
This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator. Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine new committers and made two signifiant releases following the ASF policies and guidelines. The community of Flume is active, healthy and growing and ha

Re: June reports in two weeks

2012-06-05 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > I've added Crunch to the monthly report for June. Cool, thanks! > There is currently no shepherd assigned, someone want to volunteer > or doesn't it make sense at this point? I'll give a closer look at your upcoming report unless someon