On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> On May 31, 2012 5:31 AM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>> >...
>> > (that said, I agree: this seems like it should be a proposal to
>> > Commons, so we just need to handle that redirection)
>
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On May 31, 2012 5:31 AM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
> >...
> > (that said, I agree: this seems like it should be a proposal to
> > Commons, so we just need to handle that redirection)
>
> And I didn't read the proposal closely enough, but took from Ra
On May 31, 2012, at 7:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On May 31, 2012 5:31 AM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>> ...
>> (that said, I agree: this seems like it should be a proposal to
>> Commons, so we just need to handle that redirection)
>
> And I didn't read the proposal closely enough, but took from Ralph'
Sam Ruby wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > Shane Curcuru wrote:
> >> Sweet.
> >>
> >> It would be really helpful for the pmc field to be a select list of
> >> existing
> >> TLPs / podlings.
> >
> > Not sure that will always be possible; often the mailing lists are
> > being created as part of TLP/podling c
On May 31, 2012 5:31 AM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>...
> (that said, I agree: this seems like it should be a proposal to
> Commons, so we just need to handle that redirection)
And I didn't read the proposal closely enough, but took from Ralph's
comment that this was some Java code. ... but no, it is a
Yes, that's right.
If you'd like me to make my comment on this, I'd say...
what I was trying to emphasize was, what would be the choice of
*configuration file syntax* if we have INI, XML, JSON and Apache-sytle
on the table.
Well, I would choose JSON for representing structured data which is
mainl
On 31 May 2012 07:18, Seungyoung Kim wrote:
> XML and JSON format is another one which are used wided, but little bit
> too complecated and heavy from application's stand point of view.
>
I'd agree with this critique of XML, but not JSON. Easy to yacc-up a
parser, a fair number of implementatio
Thanks all of you for taking time for reviewing my proposal.
I understand there maybe a confusion or a conflict between Commons
Configuration and my proposal. But I think there is a fundamental
difference between two projects.
From my understanding, Apache Commons and its sub modules are most
Sam Ruby wrote on Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:38:21 -0400:
> It might also make sense for me to create three fields initially, and
> make the first three required. Thoughts?
I think we accept a minimum of 2 moderators per list... (eg I think
private@svn was created with just 2 moderators)
--
cTakes is specialized for the clinical/medical domain, where OpenNLP
is a general purpose natural language processing library without any
domain specific customizations.
I hope we can establish here a good collaboration between the two projects.
Jörn
On 05/31/2012 07:20 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
Hi
Hi Don,
The components can certainly be used in other domains, but one will most likely
to retrain them
to get decent performance. (some classifiers such as smoking status, drug
signature recognition, side effects, etc. are probably domain specific though)
We actually reused existing code such O
Hi Pei,
A lot of the components listed in the proposal and the Wikipedia entry
look useful for general natural language processing, not just
clinical-data processing. Is it possible to use cTAKES for general,
non-clinical processing? Or is it built on a general core with
clinical-data-related ex
Hi Pei,
Great. I think this will dovetail nicely with the Apache OODT work and the
stuff we're doing
with Children's Hospital LA in data mgmt/etc.
Thanks and looking forward to helping out!
Cheers,
Chris
On May 31, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Chen, Pei wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> This is great news. We'll upd
Hi Chris,
This is great news. We'll update our proposal on the wiki and include you as
our mentor.
Thanks,
Pei
On May 31, 2012, at 12:11 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> This sounds like a great project. I'd be interested in potentially mentoring
> if you
> need a mento
Hey Guys,
This sounds like a great project. I'd be interested in potentially mentoring if
you
need a mentor and are open to me doing it.
Cheers,
Chris
On May 31, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think this will make a good ASF project
> and is already heavily based on Apa
Hello,
I think this will make a good ASF project
and is already heavily based on Apache software.
Jörn
On 05/30/2012 11:59 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
Hi All,
We would like to propose cTAKES to be an Apache Incubator project.
cTAKES: (clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System) is an n
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 May 2012 13:58, Shane Curcuru wrote:
>> Sweet.
>>
>> It would be really helpful for the pmc field to be a select list of existing
>> TLPs / podlings.
>
> Not sure that will always be possible; often the mailing lists are
> being created as par
On 31 May 2012 13:58, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Sweet.
>
> It would be really helpful for the pmc field to be a select list of existing
> TLPs / podlings.
Not sure that will always be possible; often the mailing lists are
being created as part of TLP/podling creation.
Even for existing TLPs/podling
[X] +1 approve (binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Sweet.
It would be really helpful for the pmc field to be a select list of
existing TLPs / podlings.
Personally, I think it would be helpful for the list name field to be a
select list for dev/user/commits/etc./Other. I.e. suggest the most
common set of names (and pick either user@ or users
On May 31, 2012 5:38 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>...
> > Many *proposals* arrive,
> > asking for the necessary quorum of committers.
>
> Is this quorum 3 committers?
Sorry. What I was trying to say, but abbreviated improperly, is that we
sh
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
>
> May I suggest adding some fields to ease data entry even more:
>
> 1- A checkbox indicating whether or not the mailing list is for an
> incubator project or not
> 2- Another list of checkboxes which are enabled only when the incubato
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Alex Karasulu
> wrote:
> >...
> > insufficient mass (from the committer perspective). We need a minimum of
> 3
> > committers to consider this a community applying to the Incubator.
>
> Careful... we need thre
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>...
> insufficient mass (from the committer perspective). We need a minimum of 3
> committers to consider this a community applying to the Incubator.
Careful... we need three for *acceptance*. Many *proposals* arrive,
asking for the necessary
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> My initial reaction is that there may be some confusion between this
> project and Commons Configuration, at least from a naming standpoint.
> However, I don't believe Commons Configuration currently supports this
> format of configuration.
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
