I appreciate your position Ralph and I don't want anyone to feel like they
can't contribute. As we've talked about before, we've been quick to nurture
new contributors to committer status successfully in a few cases. It's true
that some of the more active committers are from Cloudera, but it's not
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> I'm just saying I find it difficult to participate with that style and that
> simply makes me wonder if that is making it harder to attract new
> committers.
I suspect it attracts some and drives away others.
I frikkin' hate JIRA notificatio
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 23, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
On May 23, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>>
>> On May 23, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Ralph Goers
>>> wrote:
Right after I read Jukka's email that started this thread
On May 23, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>>
>> On May 23, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Ralph Goers
>>> wrote:
Right after I read Jukka's email that started this thread
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>> Right after I read Jukka's email that started this thread and I posted my
>>> reply and discovered to my shock that they
On May 23, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>> Right after I read Jukka's email that started this thread and I posted my
>> reply and discovered to my shock that they had started a graduation vote. I
>> am shocked because I ha
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Right after I read Jukka's email that started this thread and I posted my
> reply and discovered to my shock that they had started a graduation vote. I
> am shocked because I have pointed out repeatedly the project's complete lack
> of div
Right after I read Jukka's email that started this thread and I posted my reply
and discovered to my shock that they had started a graduation vote. I am
shocked because I have pointed out repeatedly the project's complete lack of
diversity. Virtually all the active PMC members and committers w
On May 23, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> -kafka-private
> +kafka-dev
> +general
>
> Ahh, account was only created. According to root:
>
>> Only PMC chairs can grant karma. If needed, please post to the general@/
>> dev@/private@ list of your project asking for someone with suffi
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Perhaps someone will have some insight on how to gather new
> contributors that hasn't been tried yet?
Jukka's written on this subject multiple times in the past. Here are two
gems, one from a while back, the other recent:
http://markma
-kafka-private
+kafka-dev
+general
Ahh, account was only created. According to root:
> Only PMC chairs can grant karma. If needed, please post to the general@/
> dev@/private@ list of your project asking for someone with sufficient
> karma to grant access to 'jjkoshy'.
Sorry about this confusi
[ ] +1, bring Crunch into Incubator
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
> Champion,
[x] +1, bring Crunch into Incubator (non-binding)
Regards,
Mike
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We ask the Incubator PMC to spo
Jukka, since the last report I have changed my opinion a bit and recommend you
add Flume to the "low diversity" list.
Ralph
On May 23, 2012, at 4:28 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There's plenty of time still before the June reports [1] start flowing
> in. As an early remainder to podl
Hi Jukka, I'm also concerned for S4 not having a release and low
activity. I pinged them about cutting a release a couple months ago
and they said they weren't ready. As for activity there is some
mailing list traffic but almost no jira/commits listed in april/may.
For Bigtop i've been tracking di
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Totally understand, although basing your criteria on S4's approach,
> which has a rocky time in the incubator and has yet to create a
> release, is certainly an interesting approach. Best of luck.
Assuming the VOTE passes, I hope you'll stil
Hi all,
There's plenty of time still before the June reports [1] start flowing
in. As an early remainder to podlings starting to draft their reports,
here's how the IPMC saw your status as of the previous quarterly
report in March [2]:
IP clearance: Openmeetings
No release: Bloodhound, Cordov
[X] +1, bring Crunch into Incubator (non-binding)
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We ask the Incubator PMC
+1
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> +1
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> On May 23, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
>>> i
+1
Patrick
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>
>> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
>> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
>> below.
+1
Regards,
Alan
On May 23, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
> Champion, and phunt, tomwhite
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
> Champion, and phunt, tomwhite, and acmurthy vol
+1 (non-binding)
+Vinod
On May 23, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
> Champion, and phunt, tom
Hi,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CrunchProposal
Some comments from the related vote thread:
> formally released twice, as versions 0.1.0 (October 2010) and 0.2.0
s/2010/2011/ I presume.
> == Source and Intellectual Property Submission P
Hi,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
> Champion, and phunt, tomwhite, and acmurthy
[X] +1, bring Crunch into Incubator (non-binding)
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>> That said, the team did feel strongly about keeping the initial committers
>> to people who had already added major pieces of functionality to Crunch
>
> Speaking as a former benevolen
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> That said, the team did feel strongly about keeping the initial committers
> to people who had already added major pieces of functionality to Crunch
Speaking as a former benevolent dictator...
When you bring a project to Apache, you have to a
Totally understand, although basing your criteria on S4's approach,
which has a rocky time in the incubator and has yet to create a
release, is certainly an interesting approach. Best of luck.
-jg
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> Hey Jakob,
>
> This was a tough one-- you kno
I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
Champion, and phunt, tomwhite, and acmurthy volunteering to be
Mentors.
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1, bri
Hey Jakob,
This was a tough one-- you know that I've been talking about Crunch
w/Joe Adler for a few weeks now, and I personally am really looking
forward to working with you guys. That said, the team did feel
strongly about keeping the initial committers to people who had
already added major piec
32 matches
Mail list logo
