Jukka,
Thanks for your response, this is very helpful. I have a couple of
questions/clarifications inlined.
On May 4, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>
> * As far as I can tell from the discussion, the BigTop repos directory
> [1] doesn't neatly fit into either of the above catego
Hi,
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Giraph has been been in incubator for the last year and I think it
> is ready to graduate.
That's my understanding as well: http://markmail.org/message/rxroucqrf4wowox7
> Is Giraph ready to graduate?
+1, yes
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
Hi Jukka!
Thanks a million for chiming in.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand the BigTop use cases
Perhaps this preso can help a bit:
http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pdf
> * If the former, then each subdirectory of [1] falls fair
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Benjamin Hindman
wrote:
> Can you elaborate on this? Do you mean recruit active participants from the
> Mesos community into the IPMC? Or do you mean recruit people from the IPMC
> to be more active in Mesos?
Ideally each podling should have at least three ac
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On May 4, 2012 2:03 PM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote:
>>...
>> EOD existing Apache rules/license make no such distinction. "Works
>> under the following licenses may be included within Apache products"
>> (includes ASL).
>
> Can people please stop usin
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> In the Board agenda, we have a line where each Director can state they have
> reviewed the report (before the meeting). They can also append queries and
> comments. Little mini-discussions kinda happen in those comments.
>
> Point here is: provi
Hi,
I don't understand the BigTop use cases and release model in too much
detail to have very specific or hard opinions on this, but here's a
few high-level observations that hopefully are useful for this
discussion:
* AFAICT there's no immediate release that's being blocked by this
discussion, s
On May 4, 2012, at 9:35 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi Jukka...
>
> I also added myself, but as being a Mentor of CloudStack I would rather
> take (shepherdZ: DeltaSpike, Nuvem, Wink) while Dave Fisher takes (shepherdY:
> CloudStack, NPanday, VCL)
>
> Dave would you please ACK that ?
S
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>...
>> The resulting TODOs are (see also the May2012 wiki page):
>>
>> - jukka: Airavata, Droids, SIS, Wookie, Zeta Components
>> - rgardler: Amber, PhotArk
>> - mfranklin: Ambari,
On May 4, 2012 2:03 PM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote:
>...
> EOD existing Apache rules/license make no such distinction. "Works
> under the following licenses may be included within Apache products"
> (includes ASL).
Can people please stop using "ASL" or "APL"? No such thing. It is the
Apache License. AL
On May 3, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OK, so let's see how this works out in practice. We have 19 podling
> reports to review by next Wednesday (Ambari is still empty).
>
> To keep the required effort down to a reasonable level, I divided
> these to six slots of three repor
In the Board agenda, we have a line where each Director can state they have
reviewed the report (before the meeting). They can also append queries and
comments. Little mini-discussions kinda happen in those comments.
Point here is: provide a similar location for IPMC members (including
shepherds)
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
>> help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache
>> guidelines.
>
> We aren't making new rules. We are t
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
> help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache
> guidelines.
We aren't making new rules. We are trying to help the Bigtop project
understand the rules about no
Hi Jukka...
I also added myself, but as being a Mentor of CloudStack I would rather
take (shepherdZ: DeltaSpike, Nuvem, Wink) while Dave Fisher takes (shepherdY:
CloudStack, NPanday, VCL)
Dave would you please ACK that ?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu,
+1 to graduate MRUnit.
Cheers,
Tom
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Jim Donofrio wrote:
> We havent heard anything +1 or -1 from any IPMC members besides our mentors.
> Any thoughts on this vote?
>
> We released 0.9.0-incubating on Tuesday so we have completed 4 releases and
> added 4 new commite
It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache
guidelines. It's very clear from
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html that what has been proposed
is acceptable under existing Apache rules. Bigtop is building
on/ar
The 72 hour voting period is passed and the vote is now closed. Thanks to
everyone who took time to review the release.
With the three IPMC member votes (2 of them mentors) and 5 PPMC votes the vote
succeeds.
IPMC member voting record:
* Ate Douma: +1
* Chris Mattmann : +1
Srinath Perera : +
Hi,
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Jim Donofrio wrote:
> We havent heard anything +1 or -1 from any IPMC members besides our mentors.
> Any thoughts on this vote?
+1 to graduate
Note that when you reply to a message and only change the [...]
prefix, at least GMail thinks it's just a continuati
Hi,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> This looks like a mind expanding activity. I added my name for a maximum of 2
> per month.
Great, thanks!
Would you mind taking a look at for example Nuvem and Wink this month?
Or pick some other yet unclaimed reports.
BR,
Jukka Zitti
A vote was just completed in the ManifoldCF community on the following
resolution:
==
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests
of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to
establish a Project Management Committee charged wit
21 matches
Mail list logo
