Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
> > Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
> > something much simpler. I just documented the recommendations of the
> > brand team.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Not sure that I understand your statement. The site was updated, no?
This page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
is generated from site-author/podlings.xml file.
So the "mentor" entries in that file need to change.
Then type 'ant' as normal to update the si
Not sure that I understand your statement. The site was updated, no?
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 29, 2012, at 9:43 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Those projects need to maintain their list of Mentors at
> site-author/podlings.xml and re-generate the site.
>
> -David
>
>> Author: omalley
>> Date: Sun J
Those projects need to maintain their list of Mentors at
site-author/podlings.xml and re-generate the site.
-David
> Author: omalley
> Date: Sun Jan 29 19:48:39 2012
> New Revision: 1237437
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1237437&view=rev
> Log:
> Removing myself as a mentor for accumu
On 1/29/2012 1:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> I general, because of the moving parts in incubator, I'd prefer we
>> didn't try to rotate annually, but perhaps ever 2 or 3 years, if the
>> elected chairs are willing to put up and commit for that long.
>
> That's a good point that I hadn't cons
+1 - binding - congrats!
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 18, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> the OpenNLP community has voted to graduate and requests that
> the IPMC vote on recommending this resolution to the ASF Board.
>
> Community graduation vote:
> http://mail-archives.
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
> something much simpler. I just documented the recommendations of the
> brand team.
Was this a recommendation or a requirement? I.e. are we talking about
MU
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> The status quo is that podlings must check that their name is suitable
>> before graduation.
>
> The wording of the incubator policy on this is to "check of project
>
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The status quo is that podlings must check that their name is suitable
> before graduation.
The wording of the incubator policy on this is to "check of project
name for trademark issues" [1], which I think is fine.
The exact wa
On 01/29/2012 09:37 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disagree with the topic of
this discus
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>>
FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disa
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disagree with the topic
>>> of this discussion thread. This should
On 1/29/2012 3:09 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> +1
>> But shouldn't we agree on a rotationi/reelection before we do the
>> nominations?
> Christian, I hate to repeat myself, but could I direct your attention
> to my recent message? If you think that a rotation policy should come
> first, start a
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
>>
>> FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disagree with the topic of
>> this discussion thread. This should be about Regular (re)election of the PMC
>> Chair. Regular rotatio
> +1
> But shouldn't we agree on a rotationi/reelection before we do the nominations?
Christian, I hate to repeat myself, but could I direct your attention
to my recent message? If you think that a rotation policy should come
first, start a thread proposing a rotation policy, and we can all
leave
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Deepal jayasinghe wrote:
>
>> If he has not resigned, why do we have this vote (or why started this
>> vote) ? forcing him to resign ?
>
> Because it is very poor practice, IMO, to just keep the same PMC chair in
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Deepal jayasinghe wrote:
> If he has not resigned, why do we have this vote (or why started this
> vote) ? forcing him to resign ?
Because it is very poor practice, IMO, to just keep the same PMC chair in place
forever without giving others the opportunity. This s
If he has not resigned, why do we have this vote (or why started this
vote) ? forcing him to resign ?
Deepal
> I'd like to nominate Noel to continue as chair. Noel hasn't resigned,
> and we don't have a consensus on rotation. So I think any vote we hold
> to recommend a chair to the board should i
I'd like to nominate Noel to continue as chair. Noel hasn't resigned,
and we don't have a consensus on rotation. So I think any vote we hold
to recommend a chair to the board should include the option of his
sticking in place unless he chooses to remove himself from the
running.
--
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
>> On 1/29/2012 12:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>> I intend to nominate Noel J. Bergman but would like to see the community
>>> come to a consensus about the rotation of th
On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 1/29/2012 12:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> I intend to nominate Noel J. Bergman but would like to see the community
>> come to a consensus about the rotation of the chair. (Dibs on Noel) :)
>
> If this goes to a nominations
On 1/29/2012 12:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> I intend to nominate Noel J. Bergman but would like to see the community come
> to a consensus about the rotation of the chair. (Dibs on Noel) :)
If this goes to a nominations and a ballot, isn't that implicit that
we've agreed to rotate the ch
On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
> FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disagree with the topic of
> this discussion thread. This should be about Regular (re)election of the PMC
> Chair. Regular rotation IMO would be unwise and undesirable.
Good point. I share the
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> The new documentation describing in more detail one way to check the
>> suitability of the proposed name is just about ready for public review
>
> The URL is http://
On 01/29/2012 03:15 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
There's always the perennial chat here and there about rotating the PMC chair
on a regular basis. It's my understanding that other PMCs have adopted this
policy
On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
There's always the perennial chat here and there about rotating the PMC chair
on a regular basis. It's my understanding that other PMCs have adopted this
policy and are quite happy with it. It's also
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The new documentation describing in more detail one way to check the
> suitability of the proposed name is just about ready for public review
The URL is http://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html
> It's fine to just dive in
Hi!
Jörn did update the status page, looks good now!
Here is my
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Mark Struberg
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" ; Jörn
> Kottmann ; "isa...@apache.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 9:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apac
The new documentation describing in more detail one way to check the
suitability of the proposed name is just about ready for public review
(at least, once the mirrors have sync'd)
The aim is to be able to replace the outdated task in the status
template with a link to good documentation consist w
On Jan 28, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> There's always the perennial chat here and there about rotating the PMC chair
> on a regular basis. It's my understanding that other PMCs have adopted this
> policy and are quite happy with it. It's also my understanding that some in
> thi
On Jan 28, 2012, at 6:20 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Should the current chair be forced to resign
>
> I'm not going to make an issue of it.
I didn't interpret this as directed at you but at what a new policy on regular
elections of a PMC should be.
Ralph
31 matches
Mail list logo
