I was the RM for each release.
Karl
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Let's make this simple for me: I see
> that the project has already successfully
> released 3 times now. Who has been the
>
> RM for each release?
>
>
>
>
>>
>> From: Joe Sc
>
> From: Marvin Humphrey
>To: Joe Schaefer
>Cc: "general@incubator.apache.org"
>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:28 PM
>Subject: Re: PPMC to IPMC
>
>On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:41:32PM -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> Taking a larger interest beyond a podling
>-Original Message-
>From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:51 PM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2
>
>Hi,
>
>On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Joe Schaefer
>wrote:
>> The s
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:41:32PM -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Taking a larger interest beyond a podling is nice but not required for IPMC
> membership.
+1, not a requirement.
> We certainly don't expect members to do anything like that, so why should we
> expect it of non-members?
Let's separa
The battle to allow this for podlings I work on
was fought and won several months ago. It's certainly
time to expand that "experiment" to the rest
of our podlings.
>
> From: Jukka Zitting
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:5
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> The solution is simple, bring more IPMC members
> in from the ManifoldCF podling.
Simple and obvious, yet I never thought about this. Thanks for bringing it up!
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---
Taking a larger interest beyond a podling is
nice but not required for IPMC membership. We
certainly don't expect members to do anything
like that, so why should we expect it of non-
members?
>
> From: Marvin Humphrey
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Cc: Joe
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:52:29PM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
> Sounds intriguing. How is this done? I'm afraid I'm vague as to the
> process by which people become IPMC members.
It's the same as with any other PMC at Apache: an existing PMC member proposes
a candidate and runs a vote on the priv
Let's make this simple for me: I see
that the project has already successfully
released 3 times now. Who has been the
RM for each release?
>
> From: Joe Schaefer
>To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:02 PM
>Subject: Re: [V
Generally good mentors recognize candidates
from their podlings who would make good IPMC
members and nominate them privately, just as
podlings nominate members for their own PPMC.
>
> From: Karl Wright
>To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer
>Sent: Wed
Thanks for at least having a look at this!
Even if you find the main release to be too big to look at, the three
ManifoldCF plugins, which have separate release packages (and vote
threads) are quite small with extremely limited dependencies. Maybe
those would be easier to digest? ;-)
Karl
On We
Sounds intriguing. How is this done? I'm afraid I'm vague as to the
process by which people become IPMC members.
Karl
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> The solution is simple, bring more IPMC members
> in from the ManifoldCF podling. That is exactly
> what we did for Lucy
The solution is simple, bring more IPMC members
in from the ManifoldCF podling. That is exactly
what we did for Lucy!
>
> From: Marvin Humphrey
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:33 PM
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apache-man
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:11:49PM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
> Waiting for the last IPMC vote has become the longest and most
> uncertain part of the ManifoldCF release process. Considering the
> amount of effort and good work that the committers put into each
> release, it's surely not too much t
Thanks, Jukka.
Waiting for the last IPMC vote has become the longest and most
uncertain part of the ManifoldCF release process. Considering the
amount of effort and good work that the committers put into each
release, it's surely not too much to ask for someone here to have a
look at it? (We apo
Correct is:
William Silva
Isabel Drost
Jörn
On 1/18/12 6:55 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
William Silvia
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/opennlp.html lists his name as
"William Silva". Which is correct?
Isabel Drost
example@?
- Sam Rub
On 01/12/2012 11:49 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
On 01/08/2012 06:46 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
2008-10-09 Droids
S: Somewhat active, still not enough for a TLP. Last report mentions
IP clearance issues?
R: Ask for a graduation plan in ne
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>
> William Silvia
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/opennlp.html lists his name as
"William Silva". Which is correct?
> Isabel Drost
example@?
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsu
On Jan 17, 2012 11:03 AM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote:
>...
> I'd like
> to someday even see mentors show enough respect and humility
> for their peers in the group to seek out their counsel in
> situations they have never encountered before, so that we
> all can provide some input designed to help the
+1 (binding (I'm a mentor))
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> the OpenNLP community has voted to graduate and requests that
> the IPMC vote on recommending this resolution to the ASF Board.
>
> Community graduation vote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org
Hello everyone,
the OpenNLP community has voted to graduate and requests that
the IPMC vote on recommending this resolution to the ASF Board.
Community graduation vote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-opennlp-dev/201112.mbox/%3c4edd484c.5020...@gmail.com%3E
Please cast your v
Thats right. I will suggest that
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>>...This is now the site:
>>
>> http://www.fundwiab.com
>>
>> I think this is pretty fine and there is no harm done
>
> I agree, just
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>...This is now the site:
>
> http://www.fundwiab.com
>
> I think this is pretty fine and there is no harm done
I agree, just one minor thing, they say "we will commit all patches
into the main tree" but it's the Wave PMC who's in c
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
...I'll update
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champi
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>>> ...I'll update
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion
>>> accordingly
>>
> ...Did you update this too?
> http://incub
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> ...I'll update
>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion
>> accordingly
>
> Done in revision 1232798, I'll wait for that t
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür
> wrote:
> > ...The reason the license files is not at the root is that we are
> releasing a
> > few dozen modules which are released together for voting co
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
> ...The reason the license files is not at the root is that we are releasing a
> few dozen modules which are released together for voting convenience but
> could also released separately. I suggest to add a note in the readme
> pointing o
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> ...I'll update
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion
> accordingly
Done in revision 1232798, I'll wait for that to be online to inform
podlings of the change.
-Bertrand
--
That would do it for me, but its been a contentious issue in the
Incubator so you may want to try to find one more person who says
they'd vote +1, another mentor or something, before going to the
trouble of a respin like that.
...ant
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Joe Schaefer
>> wrote:
>>> I doubt writing some more documentation on
>>> some webpage about yet another set of responsibilities
>>> for yet ano
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> ...Please cast your votes to accept the following clarifications to the
> Champion's role - this majority vote is open for at least 72 hours...
The vote passes with binding +1s from
Ross Gardler
Ant Elder
Marcel Offermans
Luciano Rese
On 1/18/12 1:45 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Aliaksandr tried to commit but couldn't.
> He got the following error:
>
> Changing file
>
'D:\Aliaksandr\Stage\NLP\parsers\OpenNLP\opennlp.svn.new\opennlp-tools\src\main\java\opennlp
33 matches
Mail list logo
