On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:51 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 20 December 2011 22:35, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
On 12/20/2011 4:24 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
The proposal says "Existing Flex-related conferences, podcasts and
websites should be allowed to continue using “Flex” as part of their
name - Ap
+1 from me (binding).
KEYS check out:
[chipotle:~/tmp/kafka-0.7.0] mattmann% curl -O
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/kafka/KEYS
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current
Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed
I'd prefer to see Apache Flex voted on by itself, without tying the
contribution to Falcon. I suspect there are more than enough people who are
willing to have a go atbthisbwithout Falcon.
Let's not strive for a perfect contribution from Adobe, and miss an
opportunity for an excellent contribution
+1. Verified the usual stuff. Updated NOTICE looks good.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checksum and signature match, unit tests passed. Verified that the
> only change was to the NOTICE, so checks from the previous thread
> hold. -C
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2
Alex,
I have been watching this recording of a session in the Flex Summit a week ago:
http://tv.adobe.com/watch/flex-community-summit-december-2011/open-discussion-about-falcon-and-falconjs/
Greg DeMichillie, Sr. Director of Product Management, and Danny
Winokur, VP/GM Interactive Business Unit a
+1
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> *bump*. We have 2 +1s from mentors already, so at a minimum we need
> just one more binding vote to do this release. Anyone have time to do
> the review?
>
> thanks!
>
> Leo
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> Ple
+1 (binding)
Checksum and signature match, unit tests passed. Verified that the
only change was to the NOTICE, so checks from the previous thread
hold. -C
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kafka community is excited to share RC 9 for release of
> Kafka-0.7.0-incubat
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share RC 9 for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating. In the interest of saving time, and with the
expectation that the one-liner change will pass the vote on
kafka-users@, we will run a vote in parallel here.
Vote thread http://markmail.org/message/sefgr5lxccty4tjz?
Thanks a lot, Alex.
I just wanted to get a better understanding of how Apache Flex relates
to Flash Player, Tamarin, Adobe AIR, and your responses really helped
me to get a better understanding of the proposal. All I have
heard/read so far sounds very promising. I like the direction Adobe is
takin
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> -Original Message-
> From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 4:55 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Ian Wild
> Subject: [VOTE] Bloodhound to join the Incubator
>
> It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time
Sebb,
This makes sense. We will fix the NOTICE file and restart the VOTE on
general@ today.
Thanks for the feedback!
-Neha
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 20 December 2011 18:51, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kafka community is excited to share that RC 8 for release of
Listing them might be nearly impossible. I don't think we know them all.
What are the rules around something like:
riaflex dot blogspot dot com
Or
www dot cflex dot net
I think there's lots of sites like these out there.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 12/20/11 2:24 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
> The
Responses inline:
On 12/20/11 12:30 PM, "Raju Bitter" wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> re-reading the proposal, a few other questions came to my mind:
>
> 1) Flash Player SDK
> What are you referring to, when listing the "Adobe Flash Player SDK"
> under "External Dependencies". The Adobe website says:
>
*bump*. We have 2 +1s from mentors already, so at a minimum we need
just one more binding vote to do this release. Anyone have time to do
the review?
thanks!
Leo
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following as
> Apache Jena version 2.7.0-incub
On 20 December 2011 22:35, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 4:24 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> The proposal says "Existing Flex-related conferences, podcasts and
>> websites should be allowed to continue using “Flex” as part of their
>> name - Apache Flex will have to create guidelines for
Ross Gardler wrote on Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 22:24:54 +:
> The proposal says "Existing Flex-related conferences, podcasts and
> websites should be allowed to continue using “Flex” as part of their
> name - Apache Flex will have to create guidelines for that."
>
For those who don't know it alrea
On 12/20/2011 4:24 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> The proposal says "Existing Flex-related conferences, podcasts and
> websites should be allowed to continue using “Flex” as part of their
> name - Apache Flex will have to create guidelines for that."
>
> Whilst I don't see any problem with that in prin
Thanks for that information, Carol!
Based on this blog post on the Flex Summit it sounded like the company
made an announcement on support contracts there:
http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2011/12/13/flex-summit-updates-on-the-open-source-strategy-and-runtimes/
Thanks again,
Raju
2011/12/20 Carol F
The proposal says "Existing Flex-related conferences, podcasts and
websites should be allowed to continue using “Flex” as part of their
name - Apache Flex will have to create guidelines for that."
Whilst I don't see any problem with that in principle it would be
really useful to itemise these item
Raju,
I believe Adobe is selling support contracts for Adobe Flex version 4.6.
Apache Flex, although initially the same codebase as Adobe Flex 4.6, would
be a different product. The community can take it in whatever direction
it would like to go.
Carol
-Original Message-
From: Raju Bit
Carol,
The legal stuff page for the Flex SDK
(http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Legal+Stuff) mention 3
different downloads:
* Free Adobe Flex SDK
* Open Source Flex SDK
* Adobe Add-ons for Open Source Flex SDK
Is the SDK version which will be contributed to Apache the "F
Marcel,
Alex and I are currently working with one of Adobe's IP lawyers to examine
our code dependencies and determine what license issues we may have and
how best to resolve them.
We will be better able to answer your question in a few weeks.
Carol
-Original Message-
From: Marcel Offerm
Thanks, Dave, that's correct.
Who will be managing/governing the ActionScript language, after Flex
has been contributed to Apache? Is there a steering committee planned
for the language?
I can imagine that there are a number of products at Adobe using
ActionScript 3. And changes to the language w
Thanks for the quick response, Greg!
On 12/20/11 9:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 15:30, Raju Bitter wrote:
>> ...
>> 2) Action Script Virtual Machine (AVM)
>> In November 2006 Adobe open source the Flash Player Script engine:
>> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/press/mozilla-2006
One small clarification. ActionScript is a variant off of ECMascript 3
(ES3). ECMAscript 4, which included significant functionality
fromActionScript was removed from active standard development in favor of
ECMAscript 5, a incremental update to ES3. http://adobe.ly/vO2EI6
ECMA is currently working
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 15:30, Raju Bitter wrote:
>...
> 2) Action Script Virtual Machine (AVM)
> In November 2006 Adobe open source the Flash Player Script engine:
> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/press/mozilla-2006-11-07.html
> Is the source code of Tamarin still the current version of the Action
Hi Alex,
re-reading the proposal, a few other questions came to my mind:
1) Flash Player SDK
What are you referring to, when listing the "Adobe Flash Player SDK"
under "External Dependencies". The Adobe website says:
http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer_sdk/
"Sorry, page not available", a
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 12/20/2011 06:47 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:55:17PM -0600, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
Please vote:
[ ] +1 Accept Bloodhound for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't accept Bloodhound for incubation (please explain)
+1 (binding)
Marvin Hu
On 20 December 2011 18:51, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kafka community is excited to share that RC 8 for release of
> Kafka-0.7.0-incubating has been +1'd over at kafka-user@incubator.
>
> Please try it out and vote for the Apache Kafka 0.7.0-incubating
> release. This is the first release of K
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share that RC 8 for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating has been +1'd over at kafka-user@incubator.
Please try it out and vote for the Apache Kafka 0.7.0-incubating
release. This is the first release of Kafka since we've joined the
Apache incubator.
Vote thread ht
+1 from me (binding)!
Cheers,
Chris
On Dec 19, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time to call
> a VOTE. Please vote on the acceptance of Bloodhound into the Apache
> Incubator.
>
> The proposal is available at [1] and its conten
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:55:17PM -0600, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 Accept Bloodhound for incubation
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't accept Bloodhound for incubation (please explain)
+1 (binding)
Marvin Humphrey
Yes, that is fine.
On 12/20/11 2:27 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> Agreed. That is/was my read, too.
>>
>> Even still, companies don't participate in ASF projects, individua
After 72 hours have gone by, this vote has passed with 11 binding IPMC +1 votes
and no other votes:
+1: Bertrand Delacretaz, Mark Struberg, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Senaka Fernando,
Chris A Mattmann, Olivier Lamy, Niclas Hedhman, Karl Pauls, Marcel Offermans,
Tim Williams, Daniel Kulp
I will send
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time to call
> a VOTE. Please vote on the acceptance of Bloodhound into the Apache
> Incubator.
>
> The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included
> below for your
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> On 12/19/11 3:39 PM, "Raju Bitter" wrote:
...
>> 8) Open standards support
>> The whole proposal does not mention open standards, JavaScript, or the
>> buzz word "HTML5". Again, it might make sense to make support of open
>> standards with Adob
Thanks for the detailed answers, Alex.
2011/12/20 Alex Harui :
> My responses inline.
>
>
> On 12/19/11 3:39 PM, "Raju Bitter" wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> the proposal looks very promising. I have a few questions around
>> ActionScript, runtime environments for compiled code, HTML5/JavaScript
>> c
> > > Please vote:
> > > [X] +1 Accept Bloodhound for incubation
> > > [ ] +0 Don't care
> > > [ ] -1 Don't accept Bloodhound for incubation (please explain)
> >
> > The world needs a great issue tracker, and starting from the Trac base is
> > Goodness.
>
>
Indeed.
+1
--
Best Regards,
-- Alex
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2011 1:55 PM, "Hyrum K Wright"
> wrote:
> >
> > It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time to call
> > a VOTE. Please vote on the acceptance of Bloodhound into the Apache
> > Incubator.
> >
> > The
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Agreed. That is/was my read, too.
>
> Even still, companies don't participate in ASF projects, individuals
> do. To me, the proposal implies Adobe is a participating entity. The
> senten
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> ...I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project.
>
> Here's a link to the proposal:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal
Thanks Alex for posting this - as mentioned there, we are looking for
more incubation mentors,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project.
>
> Here's a link to the proposal:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal
Pasted inline:
= Apache Flex Proposal =
== Abstract ==
Apache Flex is an application framework
BTW: Oracle Multi-Schema XML Validator (MSV) and ISO RELAX JARV API to JAXP
1.3 validation API bridge also not included in the release jar, shall we
remove them?
2011/12/20 sebb
> On 20 December 2011 02:30, Devin Han wrote:
> > Thank you for point it out.
> > Just as your comments, I agree to r
44 matches
Mail list logo
