Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

My responses inline. On 12/19/11 3:39 PM, "Raju Bitter" wrote: > Hi Alex, > > the proposal looks very promising. I have a few questions around > ActionScript, runtime environments for compiled code, HTML5/JavaScript > cross-compilation support, and target runtime environments listed: > > 1) W

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5

Thank you for the explanation. OK I will remove JUnit info from L&N. 2011/12/20 Nick Burch > On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote: > >> I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Agreed. That is/was my read, too. Even still, companies don't participate in ASF projects, individuals do. To me, the proposal implies Adobe is a participating entity. The sentence in question would read better as "To that end, employees of Ado

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote: I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE We do ship the junit jar in some of our release artifacts though, which is why it's there (It's also worth pointing out that lon

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5

On 20 December 2011 02:30, Devin Han wrote: > Thank you for point it out. > Just as your comments, I agree to remove JUnit info from NOTICE.txt. > > But it should be reasonable to keep the statement that we JUnit dependence > in LICENSE files. No, not if it is not included in the release artifact

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5

Thank you for point it out. Just as your comments, I agree to remove JUnit info from NOTICE.txt. But it should be reasonable to keep the statement that we JUnit dependence in LICENSE files. As our test code locate in the Apache SVN, it should also be a part of our artifacts. I also see Apache POI

Re: [VOTE] Bloodhound to join the Incubator

On Dec 19, 2011 1:55 PM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote: > > It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time to call > a VOTE. Please vote on the acceptance of Bloodhound into the Apache > Incubator. > > The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included > below for your conv

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

Agreed. That is/was my read, too. On Dec 19, 2011 6:48 PM, "ralph.goers @dslextreme.com" < ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > I don't read it that way. Yes, ASF projects only contain individuals, but > most of those individuals are employed and are in some way influenced by > their employer. Ca

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

I don't read it that way. Yes, ASF projects only contain individuals, but most of those individuals are employed and are in some way influenced by their employer. Calling out that the initial set of committers will be diverse and that a majority of those committers will be coming from places other

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

Hi Alex, the proposal looks very promising. I have a few questions around ActionScript, runtime environments for compiled code, HTML5/JavaScript cross-compilation support, and target runtime environments listed: 1) When you speak of ActionScript, is it planned to continue the development of the A

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

Donald Whitlock wrote : "Looks interesting, though. Given AOO, is this suggesting a trend of major companies transferring code and communities to Apache?" Community support and development is a principal strength of open source development. And it is increasingly apparent, at least to us, that su

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

Hello Alex, On Dec 19, 2011, at 21:20 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project. > > Here's a link to the proposal: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal First of all, thanks for this proposal, it looks well thought out. I have a question

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

A minor comment on one sentence... "To that end, Adobe will only have minority representation on the initial committers list." As I understand it, companies don't have representation in Apache projects. Individuals do, that may or may not belong to a given company, and that may or may not be ope

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

Hoo hoo!! Look at that committer list! Great stuff. Happy to see this finally land. Big +1! On Dec 19, 2011 3:21 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project. > > Here's a link to the proposal: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexPr

[PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

Hi everyone, I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project. Here's a link to the proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal Thank you, Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui -

[VOTE] Bloodhound to join the Incubator

It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time to call a VOTE. Please vote on the acceptance of Bloodhound into the Apache Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included below for your convenience. Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept Bloodhound for incubation

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

+1 Dan On Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:55:46 PM Marcel Offermans wrote: > Hello all, > > As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it > is time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on > recommending this resolution [2] to the ASF board. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

+1 --tim On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote: > Hello all, > > As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is > time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on > recommending this resolution [2] to the ASF board. > > Please

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release jena-2.7.0-incubating (RC1)

Please vote on releasing the following as Apache Jena version 2.7.0-incubating This will be the first incubator release for Jena at Apache. == Overview Jena is a Java framework for building Semantic Web applications. Jena provides a collection of tools and Java libraries to help to develop