Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> >>> Personally I don't believe whirr is in error. Voldemort is under >>> Apache 2.0 license, and as such falls under this: >>> ht

Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> Personally I don't believe whirr is in error. Voldemort is under >> Apache 2.0 license, and as such falls under this: >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound

Uh, here's the TRAC License: . You have to do what it says. The language is very simple. So is the Copyright notice. If this is the codebase that you propose to be the foundation of Bloodhound development, I suspect that an SGA (Software Grant Agreem

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound

I suggest legal-discuss@ is involved to answer it. Although it is Cat A license, I don't think it is fully kosher, as we promise that the original contributor hasn't submarined any patents, but BSD doesn't state this. Maybe it is a tiny point, but more eyes from legal-discuss@ won't hurt... On Tue

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound

I don't know the proper answer to the licensing and patent questions. My understanding (standard caveats apply) is that the BSD is a Category A license, and as software distributed under it may be included in ASF software such as Bloodhound. I'm unsure what the concern about BSD notices in source

Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> There is a sample NOTICE file linked [1] from ASF Source Header and >> Copyright Notice Policy [2] >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice >> [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice > > As someon

Re: Any objections to git hosting for Incubator projects?

Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Dec 5, 2011 10:21 AM, "Mark Struberg" wrote: > > +1 for DeltaSpike > I thinkthe other requests over at asf-infra also did come from Mentors (as far as I have seen). > Correct for Callback. My proposal links to the dev list thread i

Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

> There is a sample NOTICE file linked [1] from ASF Source Header and > Copyright Notice Policy [2] > > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice > [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice As someone trying to generate these documents, I'm actually finding t

Re: Any objections to git hosting for Incubator projects?

I would (hope to speak for the whole directmemory team) would be really willing to partecipate. Ciao, Raffaele Il giorno 03/dic/2011 17:47, "Joe Schaefer" ha scritto: > So earlier this week infrastructure put out an > RFP regarding early adoption of git hosting at > the ASF and 3 Incubator p

Yan: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator

+1(binding) Gurkan Kimden: Gerhard Petracek Kime: general@incubator.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 5 Aralık 2011 0:11 Pazartesi Konu: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator Hello, Please vote on the acceptance of DeltaSpike into the Apache Incubator. The

Re: Any objections to git hosting for Incubator projects?

+1 for DeltaSpike I thinkthe other requests over at asf-infra also did come from Mentors (as far as I have seen). LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Bertrand Delacretaz > To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer > Cc: > Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 9:57 AM > Subject

Re: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > Hello, > > Please vote on the acceptance of DeltaSpike into the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included below for > your convenience. > > Please vote: > > [ ] +1 Acc

Re: Any objections to git hosting for Incubator projects?

Hi Joe, On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > So earlier this week infrastructure put out an > RFP regarding early adoption of git hosting at > the ASF and 3 Incubator projects have responded: > callback, s4, and deltaspike... Very cool. > > Unless there are formal objections to

Re: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Bart Kummel wrote: >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > -