+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Eric Newton wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
> versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
>
> VOTE:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00939.html
>
>
> RESULT:
>
Kevan-
You appear to have generated your list of jars from looking at
kafka-0.7.0-incubating.tar.gz, the binary distribution that has been
built as a customary courtesy as part of the release attempt. This
includes quite a few jars that are not included in the source tree
since binary distribut
On 1 December 2011 21:58, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> I took a quick look at some of these artifacts. I definitely see licenses
>> missing from the LICENSE file. For example:
>>
>> paranamer-2.2.jar -- http://paranamer.codehaus.org/info/license.h
sebb wrote:
>
> OK?
Wow, thanks for that effort. Please do.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I agree that the "Suitable Name Search" is useful quagmire assistance.
If we stopped viewing stuff as "rules" then we would be better off.
It is in a podling's best interest to be sure of their name very
early in the process. If they follow these guidelines then they
are less likely to cause futu
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> My advice is to go by the published reporting
> period schedule, not by Marvin. Recently work
> was done to consolidate some of Marvin's features
> into a single script, and that seemingly has an
> off-by-one error wrt the incubator schedule.
Yes good advice. Reminders are j
Does Apache has tools (like rat) to extract all the needed license? Digging
out the license manually is both labour intensive and error prone.
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>
> >>> As it stands, either the
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> I took a quick look at some of these artifacts. I definitely see licenses
> missing from the LICENSE file. For example:
>
> paranamer-2.2.jar -- http://paranamer.codehaus.org/info/license.html
The link you reference puts this jar in the publi
This is perhaps an area where the incubator needs more caution before best
practice turns into a rule. You can call it guidance rather than best
practices, but I think you'll just say that's the same thing.
I do agree with your statements though
Sent from my Windows Phone
__
On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>>> As it stands, either the NOTICE file is wrong, or the LICENSE file is
> wrong, because the NOTICE file should not mention 3rd party products
> that are not in the LICENSE file.
>
> Thanks for the feedback! As I have already mentioned, we are
To our mentors,
The September 2011 report was not signed off. Could one of you review
the current December report and sign off on it? Thanks!
Karl
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Marvin wrote:
>
>
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubato
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> Completely agree , if there is a rule list I dont think this needs to be on
> it, this is more a best practice imo
Best practices tend to become the rule
Robert
-
To uns
>> As it stands, either the NOTICE file is wrong, or the LICENSE file is
wrong, because the NOTICE file should not mention 3rd party products
that are not in the LICENSE file.
Thanks for the feedback! As I have already mentioned, we are tracking a bug
to fix all non-blocker changes to the NOTICE f
Completely agree , if there is a rule list I dont think this needs to be on it,
this is more a best practice imo
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Robert Burrell Donkin
Sent: 12/1/2011 4:20 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [POLL] Suitable Name Searc
+1 (binding)
Gurkan
Kimden: Mark Struberg
Kime: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Gönderildiği Tarih: 30 Kasım 2011 1:40 Çarşamba
Konu: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions project
Hi!
JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to
I agree. Kafka has left the three month monthly reporting window.
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> I think we should ignore this since Kafka is now on the Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct
> schedule according to the following wiki.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedu
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> That would explain why he claimed to have mailed BeanValidation-dev,
> and our yet having failed AFAIK to receive the notification.
>
Er, strike that--we got it after all.
> Matt
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Francis De Brabandere
> wro
My advice is to go by the published reporting
period schedule, not by Marvin. Recently work
was done to consolidate some of Marvin's features
into a single script, and that seemingly has an
off-by-one error wrt the incubator schedule.
We'll try to get it fixed before the next batch
of reminders g
That would explain why he claimed to have mailed BeanValidation-dev,
and our yet having failed AFAIK to receive the notification.
Matt
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> Same thing on empire-db-dev@ I suppose Marvin (bot) somehow mailed the
> wrong projects.
>
> Cheer
Same thing on empire-db-dev@ I suppose Marvin (bot) somehow mailed the
wrong projects.
Cheers,
F
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Michael Stroucken
wrote:
> The tashi-dev mailing list just got the following message from an
> unreplyable "Marvin". The Tashi project reports in January, April, July
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 December 2011, 10:00:00 PST. The
report
for your podling wil
The tashi-dev mailing list just got the following message from an
unreplyable "Marvin". The Tashi project reports in January, April, July
and October.
Can this be ignored, or is our reporting schedule changing?
Thanks,
Michael.
Marvin wrote:
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated
The tashi-dev mailing list just got the following message from an
unreplyable "Marvin". The Tashi project reports in January, April, July
and October.
Can this be ignored, or is our reporting schedule changing?
Thanks,
Michael.
Marvin wrote:
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 December 2011, 10:00:00 PST. The
report
for your podling wil
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> Hey Robert, its not clear to me why a suitable name search should be dropped
> - is that because the brand team will do this search on a projects behalf?
This seems likely to me
But this is a POLL. Each option has advantages and disadvan
On 1 December 2011 02:29, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Kafka community is hoping to get some feedback on the updated NOTICE
> and LICENSE files for Kafka, before we post a new vote for it.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nehanarkhede/NOTICE
There are spurious "===" lines at the top of the fil
On 1 December 2011 06:16, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I notice that the NOTICE has this incomplete statement:
>
> This product includes the scala runtime and compiler
> (www.scala-lang.org) developed by EPFL, which includes
> the following license:
>
> There is not any following license.
No
27 matches
Mail list logo
