On Wednesday, November 30, 2011, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2011-11-16 21:53, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> ...I am one of the mentors for NPanday. We did not provide a report this
> month. We apologize for this...
> Do you want us to report next month instead?
I'd say yes, report at the next opportun
I notice that the NOTICE has this incomplete statement:
This product includes the scala runtime and compiler
(www.scala-lang.org) developed by EPFL, which includes
the following license:
There is not any following license.
I also notice that the LICENSE file has copyright notices.
- D
Also, we haven't ignored the fact that the NOTICE file must ideally be as
short as possible.
To track this issue, we've filed a bug -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-219 and will be fixing it for
the next release.
Thanks,
Neha
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>
Hi,
The Kafka community is hoping to get some feedback on the updated NOTICE
and LICENSE files for Kafka, before we post a new vote for it.
http://people.apache.org/~nehanarkhede/NOTICE
http://people.apache.org/~nehanarkhede/LICENSE
The previous vote thread or release artifacts are here -
http:/
On 2011-11-16 21:53, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am one of the mentors for NPanday. We did not provide a report this
> month. We apologize for this.
>
> Like Stefan I cannot seem to find the handy reminder e-mail that usually
> comes on the first day of the reporting month. Neither in my in
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> yup the [VOTE] mail is currently planed for next monday.
>
>
> I will interpret any +1 as a frenetic 'wooohooo ye' until then ;)
+1 :)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Matt Benson
>> To: general@incubat
Hi,
On 16 November 2011 20:47, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> PLEASE NOTE!
>
> From the ASF Board:
>
> For now on, all reports to the board for review/inclusion at the
> board meetings will now be due 1 WEEK before the meeting. Reports
> submitted late will be declined and you'll need to resubmit t
yup the [VOTE] mail is currently planed for next monday.
I will interpret any +1 as a frenetic 'wooohooo ye' until then ;)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Matt Benson
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:28 PM
> Subject: Re:
Mmm, shouldn't voting be carried out in a separate "[VOTE] Accept
DeltaSpike..." thread?
Matt
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> PS: Updated the proposal to re-
+1 (binding)
-Matthias
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> PS: Updated the proposal to re-add myself as Mentor...
>
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to propose the
On 30 November 2011 14:11, Leo Simons wrote:
> Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote
> for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe
> illuminating for some.
>
> cheerio,
>
> - Leo
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> On Fri,
Hey Robert, its not clear to me why a suitable name search should be dropped -
is that because the brand team will do this search on a projects behalf?
I see nameprotect is outdated, but a quick search by project members to see if
there are conflicts is still probably a good thing. It just might
Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote
for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe
illuminating for some.
cheerio,
- Leo
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Relea
+1
From: sebb
Sent: 11/30/2011 3:53 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [RFC] Proposed voting description edits
I've done a short trawl of the pages that relate to release voting.
There are two pages that I think need updating - please read on.
The Httpd
+1 (binding)
PS: Updated the proposal to re-add myself as Mentor...
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to propose the
> Apache DeltaSpike project to the Incubator.
>
> We have added the initial proposal to t
I've done a short trawl of the pages that relate to release voting.
There are two pages that I think need updating - please read on.
The Httpd release description [1] says:
"For the ASF to release the candidate tarball/archive, at least three
project members must vote affirmatively for release, a
I am sorry, didn't see the poll options. Thought it was just a heads
up if this needs to be changed.
[X] Drop Suitable Name Search
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> +1
>
> (Oops, I didn't ex
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> +1
(Oops, I didn't explain very well)
With a POLL, you need to pick one of the option.
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Yes, we reached out to them quite a while ago (informally). Board was also
involved.
Also please note that almost all of the involved contributors are long time GIT
users already!
I also have personally reserved quite a few days to help out Infra with setting
up the environment.
LieGrue,
str
+1
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> There has been concerns expressed about accumulation of rules without
> pruning. In that spirit, I'd like to find out whether the community
> feels that dropping the rule would be better than revising it into
> something workable.
Wow, exciting proposal.
Curious if infra is already accepting git for this podling. Have your
reached out to them already?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to propose the
> Apache DeltaSpike project to t
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The context for this is the discussion here -
> http://markmail.org/message/rsxjgrrufc6khlqy?q=overhead+list:org.apache.incubator.general
>
> This was a long discussion with no clear answers.
>
> We would like to know if it is OK to
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:34 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 November 2011 22:25, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> But if the team already agrees that the changes need to be made, why
>>> not do so and re-roll?
>>
>> I'd just leave that up to the releas
23 matches
Mail list logo
