On 2011-11-25, ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is
>> not a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not? (@Leo, help!)
> Not including something in the NOTICE that must be required mig
On 2011-11-25, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
> based on recent traffic here.
If anything this is a case of "ask and get three different answers" as
the Lucene.NET community added the stuff to the NOTICE file because I as
a mentor t
Amen, brother! If it's not checked into the website, it doesn't count
as documentation that's actually useful to most people.
Being more successful (and we've certainly gotten better) at getting
sufficient consensus on the right way to do something and then clearly
writing it down once at a s
On 25 November 2011 20:11, ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:59 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
>>> wrote:
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Ala
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 08:18:49PM +, ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
> > Not as frustrating as putting up a release candidate which twists in the
> > wind
> > for weeks waiting for a IPMC member to review because Mentors are awol! The
> > few in
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> Not as frustrating as putting up a release candidate which twists in the wind
> for weeks waiting for a IPMC member to review because Mentors are awol! The
> few individuals who do this thankless work on a regular basis are crucial to
>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:59 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>>>
Alan,
>> It's unfortunate that the vote only took
Well, fine, I am happy to +1.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:32 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>> I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
>>> based on recent
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:53:43AM -0800, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I think that some votes on this list are overly critical, often laden with
> personal opinions and not real Foundation requirements. This leads to a
> very frustrating experience to new podling members who are unable to tell
> the
On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:59 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>>
>>> Alan,
>>>
> It's unfortunate that the vote only took 24 hours on the Kafka list; it
>>> was my understanding that votes ta
On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:32 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
>> based on recent traffic here.
>
> LOL
>
>> Unfortunately, that conversation left me
>> with a giant headache a
+1 binding
On Nov 24, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Empire-db podling joined the incubator in July 2008. Since then it has
> made 6 releases following Apache guidelines, added 3 new committers,
> and added 1 new PPMC member. The community is healthy and gr
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
> based on recent traffic here.
LOL
> Unfortunately, that conversation left me
> with a giant headache and no clear idea.
>
> The issue is that there's a misc acknowle
I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
based on recent traffic here. Unfortunately, that conversation left me
with a giant headache and no clear idea.
The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is not
a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not?
On 2011-11-25, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> On 11/25/11 12:23 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> I'd be happy to give you my +1 if we can come up with an svn tag that
>> matches your release artifacts.
> I created a branch based on rc5. Did some changes there and run the
> maven release tool from that branc
On 11/25/11 12:23 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 11/19/11 6:00 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.
There are some differences between the svn tag and the source
distribution. The tag doesn't have any DISCLAIMER and the names in the
POMs ar
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 11/19/11 6:00 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.
There are some differences between the svn tag and the source
distribution. The tag doesn't have any DISCLAIMER and the names in the
POMs are different (Apache OpenNLP in the release vs
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> On 25 November 2011 09:13, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> ...
>
>> 4a. Existing podlings will need to elect a Champion, unless their
>> current one agrees to take on the above tasks.
>
> add "before graduation"?...
I meant right now, as some
On 25 November 2011 09:13, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
...
> 4a. Existing podlings will need to elect a Champion, unless their
> current one agrees to take on the above tasks.
add "before graduation"?
> If people agree, I'll add those poin
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Wow, my thread got away from me. Thanks for tying all that back together
> Bertrand!..
You're welcome - I hope this is aligned with your initial idea!
Considering the various comments in this thread, heres a slightly
simplified proposal to
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> ...Perhaps the proposal needs to make it explicit that the initial champion is
> the one to call a vote for the first non-IPMC champion and that this is am
> important step on the road to graduation
I think that's putting too much rules..
22 matches
Mail list logo
