On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Yeah, I'm not sure the vote can be shortened. I could be wrong. If it can
> then I totally agree with the inclination to get goin' with this release.
> I'm sorry it's had so many first and starts.
As long as the only modifications bro
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Alan,
>
>>> It's unfortunate that the vote only took 24 hours on the Kafka list; it
> was my understanding that votes take 72 hours.
>
> Because the only change was in the NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files from
> previous RC, our champion (Chris C)
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I'm sorry. I did not mean to suggest that the champion of the PPMC of which
> I am a member is any of those cases. I'm certain our champion is an ASF
> Member. I haven't checked to see if the champion is a member of the IPMC,
> tho
Alan,
>> It's unfortunate that the vote only took 24 hours on the Kafka list; it
was my understanding that votes take 72 hours.
Because the only change was in the NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files from
previous RC, our champion (Chris C) suggested we could run a quicker lazy
24 hour vote.
>> Anyway, I
It's unfortunate that the vote only took 24 hours on the Kafka list; it was my
understanding that votes take 72 hours.
Anyway, I've found some problems in the NOTICE file in that Kafka uses/ship
NUnit but it's not in the NOTICE file.
-1
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 23, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Neha Narkhe
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share that RC for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating has been +1'd over at kafka-user@incubator. Please
try it out and vote for the Apache Kafka 0.7.0-incubating release. This is
the first release of Kafka since we've joined the Apache incubator.
Based on the feed
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> >
> > Just wondering whether it would be useful to add a link to the board
> > minutes that establish podlings
>
> The IPMC creates podlings.
Could link to the mail-archives for the result of the "acceptance" vote.
-David
I'm sorry. I did not mean to suggest that the champion of the PPMC of which I
am a member is any of those cases. I'm certain our champion is an ASF Member.
I haven't checked to see if the champion is a member of the IPMC, though I
wouldn't be surprised.
I was not speaking on behalf of champi
On 23 November 2011 22:39, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:05 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Given the expansion in the Champion role that is being proposed, I
>> think it would make sense to include an entry for the champion role in
>> podlings.xml.
>
> +1
>
>> Also, it would make sen
On Nov 23, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 02:09:13PM -0800, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>> Also, the notion of the champion as the podling mentor herder has a certain
>> appeal.
>
> It seems a little odd to me that a PPMC member who is neither an ASF Member
> no
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:05 PM, sebb wrote:
> Given the expansion in the Champion role that is being proposed, I
> think it would make sense to include an entry for the champion role in
> podlings.xml.
+1
> Also, it would make sense to publish the name of the champion in the
> listing of podlin
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 02:09:13PM -0800, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Also, the notion of the champion as the podling mentor herder has a certain
> appeal.
It seems a little odd to me that a PPMC member who is neither an ASF Member
nor on the IPMC may be elected to the Champion role and then woul
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> 3. The Champion is not necessarily a mentor.
Ah now I know what confused me.
A Champion is not necessarily a mentor - but he should be either on
the IPMC, a Officer or a Member, right?
A Champion cannot be elected out of the podling
On 23 November 2011 21:36, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> +1 to any of sebb's ideas. Making it easier to find this kind of historical
> stuff would be great.
>
> Also see (manually maintained after board meetings):
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/board-meeting-history.csv
>
> Mo
As member of a PPMC whose champion continued after formation of the podling, I
would miss someone in that role.
Also, the notion of the champion as the podling mentor herder has a certain
appeal.
At the moment, our champion is the person who performs many of the actions that
require more th
+1 to any of sebb's ideas. Making it easier to find this kind of
historical stuff would be great.
Also see (manually maintained after board meetings):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/board-meeting-history.csv
Most of which probably doesn't have to be private, but needs t
sebb wrote on Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 20:38:51 +:
> I suppose an alternative would be to create an index to the board
> meeting minutes just showing the TLP creations ordered by TLP name.
> That might be more generally useful.
Shane has that in a CSV somewhere I think.
--
On 23 November 2011 20:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> sebb wrote on Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 20:19:47 +:
>> Just wondering whether it would be useful to add a link to the board
>> minutes that establish podlings
>
> The IPMC creates podlings.
Doh!
[Sorry, brian farted!]
>> and create TLPs?
>
> +1
>
sebb wrote on Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 20:19:47 +:
> Just wondering whether it would be useful to add a link to the board
> minutes that establish podlings
The IPMC creates podlings.
> and create TLPs?
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
Just wondering whether it would be useful to add a link to the board
minutes that establish podlings and create TLPs?
So for example, Libcloud was established in [1]; this could be added
to podlings.xml and added as a link in "Start Date" column in the list
of podlings [2].
Similarly for graduate
+1
Checked signatures/md5, ran RAT, tag looks good.
Cheers,
Tom
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Bilung Lee wrote:
> This will be the first incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
> 1.4.0-incubating.
>
> We got two IPMC votes from our dev list and are looking for a third.
> Thanks!
>
> **
Given the expansion in the Champion role that is being proposed, I
think it would make sense to include an entry for the champion role in
podlings.xml.
Also, it would make sense to publish the name of the champion in the
listing of podlings:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
Not su
Great stuff, and great discussion. Thanks in particular Bertrand for
making it a specific proposal. +1
On 2011-11-22 4:29 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...
3. The Champion is not necessarily a mentor.
Correct - from the organizational point of view, the champion role as
defined is almost
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13156042#comment-13156042
]
Shane Curcuru commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
---
Note that trademar
On 2011-11-23, sebb wrote:
> On 23 November 2011 05:17, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>> I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and
>> ready for your testing and voting.
>> Release candidate artifacts:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating
On 23 November 2011 05:17, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and
> ready for your testing and voting.
>
>
> Release candidate artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/
The source arc
On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 12:10:57 AM Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Looks like I don't have sufficient karma to do it myself. Could someone
> with karma please give 'secooper' svn rights for the rave project?
Done.
Dan
>
> Requested change in [1]:
> -rave=ard,ate,hadrian,rgardler,scottbw,un
Well IMO the whole point of the reporting at the ASF is for the
"business requirements" of being a non-profit org are satisfied.
What that means is that the committee's activities, and ONLY the
committees activities, are relevant to the board report. Yes we
talk about community and non-PMC member
On 22 November 2011 03:50, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : We should be reporting to the board about OUR work, not the work of
> : the podlings. Podlings should only be brought in for a few specific
> : examplesto mention. That's the first thing to correct.
>
> While I generally agree with everythi
: We should be reporting to the board about OUR work, not the work of
: the podlings. Podlings should only be brought in for a few specific
: examplesto mention. That's the first thing to correct.
While I generally agree with everything you suggest, your entire premise
seems to be in direct co
Looks like I don't have sufficient karma to do it myself. Could someone
with karma please give 'secooper' svn rights for the rave project?
Requested change in [1]:
-rave=ard,ate,hadrian,rgardler,scottbw,unico,upayavira,woonsan,mfranklin,jcian,carlucci,svanderwaal,mpierce,raminder,zhguo,smarru,ct
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
> On Nov 23, 2011 8:12 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
>> I can already hear the questions: "Can I serve as
>> a Champion, I am not a committer, but would like to bring this pro
On 23 November 2011 09:14, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...
> Vice President implies power, we don't want to give the impression
> that the Champion has any superpowers (reread the thread from which
> this one derives) - it's just a coordination role.
+1
I imagine I would vote against any role o
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:28:06PM +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> ...The word "champion" doesn't seem to describe this new role precisely. A
> "champion" is someone who fights on your behalf -- in the context of a new
> podling vouchi
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 23, 2011 8:12 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Bert
35 matches
Mail list logo
