William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> >
> >I *suggest* that incubator change the procedure such that all
> >committers (or at least all committers within a single LDAP
> >group) have access to all incubator areas and that new people
> >simply be requested to only commit within areas
Hi all,
the RAT community has voted to release Apache RAT Incubating 0.8 with
four +1s by PPMC members, all of whom are IPMC members as well.
svn tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/tags/apache-rat-0.8RC2/
tarballs:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/apache-rat-0.8RC2/
Thanks for the update Marcel, and sorry for the late answer.
I updated the Fediz proposal with your comment.
Thanks again,
Regards
JB
On 11/03/2011 12:40 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Nov 1, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FedizProposal
Defi
Hi Nick,
sorry for my late answer, I was busy with the ApacheCon presentation.
The current Fediz codebase doesn't support OID/OAuth. Of course, it
could be interested to support it, by implementing it or by leveraging
existing implementations.
Some pointer about OID/OAuth:
- OID/OAuth doesn'
+1 Signatures and checksums look good. Rat reports no license problems.
Doug
On 11/02/2011 06:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is the second incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.2.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Re
Hey Guys,
Giraph reported in August 2011, September 2011 and in October 2011, so I think
it's out of
the monthly reporting cycle. I removed it from the:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2011
page. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Nov 10, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Coming back to this.
>
> It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
> that Olio will graduate.
>
> So, voting:
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, no because...
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM
Thanks Craig - nice to not have to delete the code :)
I've updated the site.
Hen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> +1 to retire Olio.
>
> The code grant for olio was signed and recorded
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/documents/cclas/sun-microsystems-olio.pdf
> )
On 11/11/2011 1:58 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I *suggest* that incubator change the procedure such that all
committers (or at least all committers within a single LDAP
group) have access to all incubator areas and that new people
simply be requested to only commit within areas for which they
hav
same here, big +1.
Tommaso
2011/11/11 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Hi guys,
>
> I second Chris on that point.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 11/11/2011 04:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
>> Hi Roy,
>>
>> I would be super +1 for this. I think it would really help people out, and
>> let those mentor
Hi guys,
I second Chris on that point.
Regards
JB
On 11/11/2011 04:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Roy,
I would be super +1 for this. I think it would really help people out, and
let those mentoring the podlings and those doing the work manage
the addition/removal of people to their
Hi Roy,
I would be super +1 for this. I think it would really help people out, and
let those mentoring the podlings and those doing the work manage
the addition/removal of people to their PPMCs. It would also hopefully
ease the burden on the PMC chairs and (hopefully) simplify infra.
Thanks fo
Small items:
1. There are no podling PPMC members that have the necessary authorizations,
even though they are committers. Mentors (and a champion) yes, chair no. This
is partly why there are these regular calls for a mentor or someone on the
incubator PMC to connect some dots.
2. The auth
On 11 November 2011 07:58, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It has come to my attention that we are wasting resources and
> time trying to manage separate committer lists within infra for
> every podling. That is something that we can effectively manage
> once a TLP has become self-governin
+1
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Coming back to this.
>
> It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
> that Olio will graduate.
>
> So, voting:
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, no because...
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe
+1
...ant
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> I would like to gently remind all of the IPMC members that
> it's been more than a week by now since our initial request
> for a vote. We've got 2 +1s from IPMC and 6 +1s from the
> community and we would really be grateful i
I would like to gently remind all of the IPMC members that
it's been more than a week by now since our initial request
for a vote. We've got 2 +1s from IPMC and 6 +1s from the
community and we would really be grateful if somebody from
the IPMC who hasn't voted yet would take a look at our
artifacts
Hi folks,
It has come to my attention that we are wasting resources and
time trying to manage separate committer lists within infra for
every podling. That is something that we can effectively manage
once a TLP has become self-governing and self-sufficient in its
interaction with infrastructure.
18 matches
Mail list logo
